Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:19:41.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do re-ensiling time and application of Lactobacillus buchneri alter the characteristics of sugarcane silage?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2020

E. F. S. Faria ,
T. C. da Silva ,
D. dos S. Pina ,
E. M. Santos ,
M. L. G. M. L. de Araújo ,
L. O. da Silva  and
G. G. P. de Carvalho Open the ORCID record for G. G. P. de Carvalho [Opens in a new window]
E. F. S. Faria
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
T. C. da Silva
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Belém, Pará, Brazil
D. dos S. Pina
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
E. M. Santos
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, Brazil
M. L. G. M. L. de Araújo
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
L. O. da Silva
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
G. G. P. de Carvalho*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: G.G.P. de Carvalho, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effects of re-ensiling time and Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation profile, chemical composition and aerobic stability of sugarcane silages. The experiment was set up as a repeated measure design consisting of four air-exposure periods (EP)(0, 6, 12, and 24 h) microbial additive (A) (L. buchneri; or lack of there), with five replicates. Sugarcane was ground through a stationary forage chopper and ensiled in four plastic drums of 200-L capacity. After 210 days of storage, the drums were opened and half of the silage mass was treated with L. buchneri at the concentration of 105 cfu/g of forage. Subsequently, the silages were divided into stacks. The re-ensiling process was started immediately, at 0, 6, 12 and 24-hour intervals, by transferring the material to PVC mini-silos. Silos were opened after 120 days of re-ensiling. The use of L. buchneri reduced butyrate concentration but did not change ethanol or acetic acid concentrations and aerobic stability. An interaction effect between L. buchneri and re-ensiling time was observed for dry matter (DM) losses and composition. Lactobacillus buchneri is not effective in improving aerobic stability in re-ensiled sugarcane silages. However, less DM is lost in silages treated with L. buchneri and exposed to air for 24 h. Re-ensiling sugar cane in up to 24 h of exposure to air does not change final product quality.

Keywords

Additivesaerobic stabilityfermentationlosses
Type
Animal Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 158 , Issue 5 , July 2020 , pp. 438 - 446
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvares, CA, Stape, JL, Sentelhas, PC, Goncalves, JLM and Sparovek, G (2014) Koppen's climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22, 711–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AOAC (1990) Official Methods of Analysis, 12 Edn. Washington, DC: Association Of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Ávila, CLS, Pinto, JC, Oliveira, DP and Schwan, RF (2012) Aerobic stability of sugar cane silages with a novel strain of Lactobacillus sp. Isolated from sugar cane. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 41, 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolsen, KK, Lin, C, Brent, BE, Feyerherm, AM, Urban, JE and Aimutis, WR (1992) Effects of silage additives on the microbial succession and fermentation process of alfafa and corn silages. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 3066–3083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, BF, Ávilla, CLS, Pinto, JC, Pereira, MN and Schwan, RF (2012) Effects of propionic acid and Lactobacillus buchneri (UFLA SIL 72) addition on fermentative and microbiological characteristics of sugar cane silage treat with and without calcium oxide. Grass Forage Science 67, 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaney, AL and Marbach, EP (1962) Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clinical Chemistry 8, 130–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y and Weinberg, ZG (2014) The effect of relocation of whole-crop wheat and corn silages on their quality. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 406–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Driehuis, F and Wikselaar, PG (2000) The occurrence and prevention of ethanol fermentation in high-dry-matter grass silage. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 80, 711–718.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubois, M, Gilles, KA, Hamilton, JK, Rebers, PA and Smith, F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Biochemistry 28, 350–356.Google Scholar
Erickson, PS, Whitehouse, NLE and Spangler, DA (2012) Case study: adding a bacterial inoculant to corn silage removed from a bunker silo and stored in piles. The Professional Animal Scientist 28, 244–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freitas, AWP, Pereira, JC, Rocha, FC, Costa, MG, Leonel, FP and Ribeiro, MD (2006) Avaliação da qualidade nutricional da silagem de cana-de-açúcar com aditivos microbianos e enriquecida com resíduo da colheita de soja. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 35, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jobim, CC, Nussio, LG, Reis, RA and Schmidt, P (2007) Methodological advances in evaluation of preserved forage quality. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 36, 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaps, M and Lamberson, WR (2017) Biostatistics for Animal Science, 3rd Edn. Boston, MA: CABI Publications. p. 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, P, Henderson, AR and Heron, S (1991) The Biochemistry of Silage, 2nd Edn. Marlow: Chalcombe Publications.Google Scholar
Mendes, CQ, Susin, I, Nussio, LG, Pires, AV, Rodrigues, GH and Urano, FS (2008) Efeito do Lactobacillus buchneri na fermentação, estabilidade aeróbia e no valor nutritivo de silagem de cana-de-açúcar. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37, 2191–2198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, DR (1997) Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1463–1481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michel, PHF, Goncalves, LC, Rodrigues, JAS, Keller, KMVS, Raposo, VS, Lima, EM, Santos, FPC and Jayme, DG (2017) Re-ensiling and inoculant application with Lactobacillus plantarum and Propionibacterium acidipropionici on sorghum silages. Grass and Forage Science 72, 432–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muck, RE and Dickerson, JT (1988) Storage temperature effects on proteolysis in alfalfa silage. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 31, 1005–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, AC, Garcia, R, Pires, AJV, Oliveira, HC, Almeida, VVS, Silva, RR, Nascimento Filho, CS and Abreu Filho, G (2015) Chemical composition and fermentation characteristics of sugar cane silage enriched with detoxified castor bean meal. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 67, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedroso, ADF, Nussio, LG, Paziani, SDF, Loures, DRS, Igarasi, MS, Coelho, RM, Packer, IH, Horii, J and Gomes, LH (2005) Fermentation and epiphytic microflora dynamics in sugar cane silage. Scientia Agricola 62, 427–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedroso, AF, Nussio, LG, Loures, DRS, Paziani, SF, Ribeiro, JL, Mari, LJ, Zopollatto, M, Schmidt, P, Mattos, WRS and Horii, J (2008) Fermentation, losses, and aerobic stability of sugarcane silages treated with chemical or bacterial additives. Scientia Agricola 65, 567–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedroso, AF, Rodrigues, AA, Barioni Júnior, W and Souza, GB (2011) Fermentation parameters, quality and losses in sugarcane silages treated with chemical additives and a bacterial inoculant. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40, 2318–2322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Playne, MJ and McDonald, P (1966) The buffering constituents of herbage and silage. Journal of Food Science and Agriculture 17, 264–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranjit, NK and Kung, L Jr (2000) The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri, Lactobacillus plantarum, or a chemical preservative on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 526–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, WCC, Nascimento, WG, Magalhães, ALR, Silva, DKA, Silva, WJCS, Santana, AVS and Soares, GSC (2015) Nutritive value, total losses of dry matter and aerobic stability of the silage from three varieties of sugarcane treated with commercial microbial additives. Animal Feed Science Technology 204, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, EJA, Borgatti, LMO, Meyer, PM, Marino, CT and Rodrigues, PHM (2008) Efeitos do teor de carboidratos solúveis sobre as características da silagem de cana-de-açúcar. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37, 1375–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, LD, Pereira, OG, Silva, TC, Leandro, ES, Paula, RA, Santos, SA, Ribeiro, KG and Valadares Filho, SC (2018) Effects of Lactobacillus buchneri isolated from tropical maize silage on fermentation and aerobic stability of maize and sugarcane silages. Grass and Forage Science 73, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siqueira, GR, Reis, RA, Schocken-Iturrino, RP, Pires, AJV, Bernardes, TF and Amaral, RC (2007) Perdas de silagens de cana-de-açúcar tratadas com aditivos químicos e bacterianos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 36, 2000–2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, CC and Kung, L Jr (2002) The effect of Lactobacillus Buchnneri 40788 on the fermentation and aerobic stability of high moisture corn in laboratory silos. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 1526–1532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valeriano, AR, Pinto, JC, Ávila, CLS, Evangelista, AR, Tavares, VB and Schwan, RF (2009) Efeito da adição de Lactobacillus sp. na ensilagem de cana-de-açúcar. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38, 1009–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ (1994) Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminants, 2nd Edn. Ithaca: Cornell University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polyssacharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, JM and Davies, DR (2012) The aerobic stability of silage: key findings and recent developments. Grass Forage Science 68, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolford, MK (1984) The Silage Fermentation. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar