Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-ksm4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T02:02:31.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The distribution of insect pests on crops of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.) and the damage they cause

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. B. Free  and
Ingrid H. Williams
J. B. Free
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station Harpenden, Hertfordshire
Ingrid H. Williams
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station Harpenden, Hertfordshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

During 3 years the distribution of pests on ten crops of winter rape and two of spring rape, and the damage they caused, has been determined.

During immigration the adults of all pests infested crop edges more than crop centres, particularly on large crops, irrespective of the presence of wind breaks. The proportion of M. aeneus and G. assimilis at the crop edge gradually diminished as they moved further into the crop, and their larvae and pods with C. assimilis emergence holes were more evenly distributed over the crops than the adults. Damage by M. aeneus was not the only cause of podless stalks. The larvae of D. brassicae were largely confined to the edges of crops; split pods were largely but not solely confined to the edges.

In winter rape crops correlations were found between the percentage of podless stalks per plant and the number of M. aeneus present, and the percentage of pods infested with C. assimilis larvae and the adult C. assimilis population. In two fields infested with D. brassicae the diminution in the proportion of split pods from crop edge to crop centre was positively correlated with diminution in the number of adult D. brassicae.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 92 , Issue 1 , February 1979 , pp. 139 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, D. V. & Gould, H. J. (1975). Surveys of pest incidence on oil-seed rape in the U.K. Proceedings 8th British Insecticide and Fungicide Conference 489–495.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, G. W. (1956). [The biology and control of the colza seed-weevil (Ceuthorhynchus assimilis Payk.) and the brassioa pod midge (Dasyneura brassicae Winn.).] Instituut voor Plantenziektenkundig Onderzaek Wageningen Mededelingen 132, 59.Google Scholar
Buhl, C. (1957). Beitrag zur frage der biologischen Abhän gegigkeit der Kolschotenmücke (Dasyneura brassicae Winn.) von dem Kohlschoten rüssler (Ceuthorrhynchus assimilis Payk.). Zeitschrift für pflanzenkrank heiten 64, 562–568.Google Scholar
Buhl, C. & Waede, E. M. (1958). Ein Versuch zur Bekämpfung von Rapsschädlingen, insbesondere des Rapsglanzkäfers (Meligethes spp.) mit Hilfe eines Flugzeugeinsatzes. Nachrichtenbiatt für den Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienst (Brauschweig) 10, 74–78.Google Scholar
Cramer, H. H. (1967). Plant Protection and World Crop Production. Pflanzenschutznachrichten, Bayer 20, 1.Google Scholar
Free, J. B. & Williams, , Ingrid, H. (1978). A survey of the damage caused to crops of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.) by insect pests in southcentral England and its effect on seed yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, J. B. & Williams, Ingrid H. (1979). The infestation of crops of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.) by insect pests. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, H. A. (1960). Möglichkeiten zur kurzfristigen Voranssage des Auffretens der Kohlschotenmücke (Perrisia (Dasyneura) brassicae Winn.) und Beziehungen des Mückensclupfes zu Witterungsfaktoren. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Universitat Rostock 15 math. nat. Reike 275–282.Google Scholar
Kühne, W. (1967). Zur Befallsvertenlung der Kohlschotengallmücke Dasyneura brassicae Winnertz in grossflächigen Beständen (Diptera: Itonididae). Beitrage zur Entomologie 17, 287–297.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. (1970). Patterns of distribution of insects near a wind-break of tall trees. Annals of Applied Biology 65, 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1976). Oil-Seed Rape. Short Term Leaflet No. 76.Google Scholar
Risbec, J. (1952). Contribution àl'étude de Ceuthorrhynchus assimilis Payk. charancon des siliques de colza. Revue de Pathologic Vegetale et d'Entomologie Agricole 31, 179–180.Google Scholar
Schreir, O. (1967). Aufreten und Bekämpfung der Kohlschotenmücke (Dasyneura brassicae Winn.) und des Kohlsehotenrüsslers (Ceulhorrynchus assimilis Payk.) an Baps in Österreich (1. Mitteilung). Pflanzenschutzberichte 35, 3–16.Google Scholar
Thiem, E. (1970). Die Bedeutung der Feldrandben-handlung für der Bekämpfung von Dasineura brassicae Winn. (Dipt., Cecidomyiidae) und Ceuthorrhynchus assimilis Payk. (Col., Curculionidae) imblühenden Raps und der Einfluss dieser Insektizidmassnahme auf das Vorkommen von Trichomalus perfectus Walker (Hym., Chalcidoidea) an den Larven des Kohlsehotenrüsslers. Archiv für Phytopathohgie und Pflanzenschutz 6, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thygesen, T. (1962). Om muligheden for en mere effektiv bekaempelse af rapsens alvorligste skadedyr, skulpegelmyggen (Dasyneura brassicae). Ugeskrift for Landmaend 15, 7 pp.Google Scholar
Waede, M. (1960). Versuche zur Bekämpfung der Kohlschotenmücke (Dasyneura brassicae Winn.) in blühenden ölfruchtbeständen mit Hilfe des Kaltnebelverfahrens. Nachrichtenblatt für den Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienst 12, 65–70.Google Scholar
Williams, Ingrid H. (1978). The pollination requirements of swede rape (Brassica napus L.) and of turnip rape (Brassica campestris L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 343–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Ingrid H. & Free, J. B. (1978). The feeding and mating behaviour of pollen beetles (Meligethes aeneus Fab.) and seed weevils (Ceutorrhynchus assimilis Payk.) on oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Ingrid H. & Free, J. B. (1979). Compensation of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.) plants after damage to their buds and pods. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, A. L. (1961 a). Studies on the relationship between three species of Coleoptera and certain species of annual mustard and rape. Entomologia Expervmentalis et Applicata 4, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, A. L. (1961 b). Field observations on the control of blossom beetles (Meligethes aeneus F.) and cabbage-seed weevils (Ceuthorrhynchus assimilis Payk.) on mustard-seed crops in East Anglia. Annals of Applied Biology 49, 539–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, A. L. (1961 c). Observations on the biology and Control of the cabbage stem weevil Ceuthorrhynchus quadridena (Panz.) on trowse mustard (Broasica juncea). Bulletin of Entomological Research 52, 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar