Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:53:39.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The digestibility of the carbohydrate complex by birds of different ages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. Bolton
W. Bolton
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Centre, West Mains Road, Edinburgh 9
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The digestibility of the carbohydrates in compounded poultry diets has been estimated, using both conventional and individual methods for certain components.

2. In the conventional analysis, crude fibre was apparently digested to the extent of 5%; this has been shown to be due to the comparison of different complexes in the food and the droppings.

3. Sugar and starch were digested by birds of all ages, and cellulose and lignin were indigestible. The digestibility of pentosan increased with increased age of the bird.

4. By deleting crude fibre and adopting available carbohydrate for the partition of the carbohydrate complex in foods, the nutritive ratio of a compound diet can be estimated from analytical data, and the amount of extra protein necessary when a diet is supplemented by fat can be calculated.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , November 1955 , pp. 420 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bird, S. & Sinclair, J. W. (1939). Sci. Agric. 19, 542.Google Scholar
Bolton, W. (1954). Proc. Xth World's Poult. Congr. Edinburgh, p. 94.Google Scholar
Bolton, W. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 46, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combs, G. F., Rice, W. H., Twining, P. F. & Jull, M. A. (undated). Univ. Maryland Fact Sheet, no. 55.Google Scholar
Duckworth, J., Naftalin, J. M. & Dalgarno, A. C. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fertilizer & Feeding Stuffs Act (1926). London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Henderson, E. W. & Irwin, W. E. (1940). Poult. Sci. 19, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henneberg, W. & Stohmann, F. (1860). Beiträge zur Begründung einer rationellen Fütterung der Wiederkauer, 1. Cited by Browne, C. A. (1940). J. Ass. Off. Agric. Chem., Wash., 23, 102.Google Scholar
Heywang, B. W. (1943). Poult. Sci. 22, 446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, F. W. (1952). Word's Poult. Sci. J. 8, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, F. W., Norris, L. C., Heuser, G. F. & Scott, M. L. (1953). Cornell Feed Service, 02, p. 1.Google Scholar
Manson, T. (1955). Private communication.Google Scholar