Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:47:28.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differences between related grasses, times of year and plant parts in digestibility and chemical composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Wilman ,
Y. Gao  and
M. A. K. Altimimi
D. Wilman
Affiliation:
Welsh Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3DD, UK
Y. Gao
Affiliation:
Welsh Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3DD, UK
M. A. K. Altimimi
Affiliation:
Welsh Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3DD, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

True dry matter digestibility, proportion of cell content, digestibility of cell wall, N and water-soluble carbohydrate were determined in eight related grasses in February, June and September in each of three years. In a separate experiment, true dry matter digestibility, proportion of cell content and digestibility of cell wall were determined in five plant parts of vegetative tillers of two grasses in February, April, June, August, October and December in each of two years.

Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) was the most digestible grass and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and Westerwolds ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum var. Westerwoldicum) were the least digestible. Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) was high in proportion of cell content, but not in digestibility of cell wall. Meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis) was high in digestibility of cell wall, but low in proportion of cell content. Perennial ryegrass and hybrid ryegrass were high, and tall fescue low, in both proportion of cell content and digestibility of cell wall. Ryegrasses were lower than fescues in concentration of N and higher than the fescues in water-soluble carbohydrate; ryegrass × meadow fescue hybrids were intermediate between the parent species in N and watersoluble carbohydrate.

Grass sampled in June and August was lower in both proportion of cell content and digestibility of cell wall than grass sampled at cooler times of year. Grass sampled in February was high in proportion of cell content and N, intermediate to high in digestibility of cell wall and intermediate in water-soluble carbohydrate.

Expanding leaf blades of perennial and Italian ryegrass were higher than expanded blades and sheaths in digestibility of cell wall and similar to expanded blades and higher than sheaths in proportion of cell content. Cell wall was less digestible in the tip than in the middle and basal portions of expanded leaf blades.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 127 , Issue 3 , November 1996 , pp. 311 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Technical review by an Agricultural Research Council Working Party. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E. (1993). Ruminant animal production from forages: present position and future opportunities. In Proceedings of the XVIIth International Grassland Congress, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 1993, Volume I, pp. 535–541. Palmerston North: New Zealand Grassland Association.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Terry, R. A., Cammell, S. B. & Wallace, A. S. (1978). The digestion of spring and autumn harvested perennial ryegrass by sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 463–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deinum, B. & Dirven, J. G. P. (1974). A model for the description of the effects of different environmental factors on the nutritive value of forages. In Proceedings of the XIIth International Grassland Congress, Moscow, USSR, Volume I, pp. 338–346. Moscow: Congress Organizing Committee.Google Scholar
Deinum, B. & Dirven, J. G. P. (1975). Climate, nitrogen and grass. 6. Comparison of yield and chemical composition of some temperate and tropical grass species grown at different temperatures. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 23, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dent, J. W. & Aldrich, D. T. A. (1963). The interrelationships between heading date, yield, chemical composition and digestibility in varieties of perennial ryegrass, timothy, cocksfoot, and meadow fescue. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 9, 261–281.Google Scholar
Faithfull, N. T. (1971). Automated simultaneous determination of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and calcium on the same herbage digest solution. Laboratory Practice 20, 41–44.Google Scholar
Harkess, R. D. & Alexander, R. H. (1969). The digestibility and productivity of selected herbage varieties. Journal of the British Grassland Society 24, 282–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunelius, H. T. (1990). Dry matter production, fibre composition and plant characteristics of cool-season grasses under two harvest systems. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 115, 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunelius, T. & Halliday, L. (1989). Nutritive value and production of cool season grasses under two harvest regimes. In Proceedings of the XVIth International Grassland Congress, Nice, France, Volume II, pp. 827–828. Versailles Cédex: Association Françcaise pour la Production Fourragère.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1990). Forage in Ruminant Nutrition. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J., Harris, C. E., Raymond, W. F. & Milford, R. (1964). The digestibility and voluntary intake of S22 and H.1 ryegrass, S170 tall fescue, S48 timothy, S215 meadow fescue and Germinal cocksfoot. Journal of the British Grassland Society 19, 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moir, K. W. (1972). An assessment of the quality of forage from its cell-wall content and amount of cell wall digested. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, E., Frederiksen, J. H. & Witt, N. (1973). Græsser i renbestand. II. Kemisk sammensstning, fordøjelighed og foderværdi [Grasses in pure stand. II. Chemical composition, digestibility and feeding value]. 3. beretning fra Fœllesudvalget for Statens Planteavls-og Husdyrbrugsforsog. København: Udgivet af Statens Planteavlsudvalg og Statens Husdyrbrugsudvalg.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. (1987). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer. In Ecosystems of the World 17B: Managed Grasslands: Analytical Studies (Ed. Snaydon, R. W.), pp. 61–70. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Nelson, C. J. & Moser, L. E. (1994). Plant factors affecting forage quality. In Forage Quality, Evaluation, and Utilization (Ed. Fahey, G. C. Jr), pp. 115–154. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Osbourn, D. F., Terry, R. A., Outen, G. E. & Cammell, S. B. (1974). The significance of a determination of cell walls as the rational basis for the nutritive evaluation of forages. In Proceedings of the XIIth International Grassland Congress, Moscow, USSR, Volume III, pp. 374–380. Moscow: Congress Organizing Committee.Google Scholar
Radojevic, I., Simpson, R. J., St. John, J. A. & Humphreys, M. O. (1994). Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of lines of Lolium perenne selected for high concentrations of water-soluble carbohydrate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 901–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spedding, C. R. W. & Diekmahns, E. C. (Eds) (1972). Grasses and Legumes in British Agriculture, Bulletin no. 49, Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Terry, R. A. & Tilley, J. M. A. (1964). The digestibility of the leaves and stems of perennial ryegrass, cocksfoot, timothy, tall fescue, lucerne and sainfoin, as measured by an in vitro procedure. Journal of the British Grassland Society 19, 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, T. A. (1977). An automated procedure for the determination of soluble carbohydrates in herbage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 639–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. & Wine, R. H. (1967). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 50, 50–55.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Wine, R. H. & Moore, L. A. (1966). Estimation of the true digestibility of forages by the in vitro digestion of cell walls. In Proceedings of the Xth International Grassland Congress, Helsinki, pp. 438–441. Helsinki: Finnish Grassland Association.Google Scholar
Wilman, D. & Altimimi, M. A. K. (1982). The digestibility and chemical composition of plant parts in Italian and perennial ryegrass during primary growth. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 33, 595–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilman, D. & Altimimi, M. A. K. (1984). The in-vitro digestibility and chemical composition of plant parts in white clover, red clover and lucerne during primary growth. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 35, 133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilman, D. & Gao, Y. (1996). Herbage production and tiller density in five related grasses, their hybrids and mixtures. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 127, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilman, D. & Mohamed, A. A. (1980). Response to nitrogen application and interval between harvests in five grasses – 1. Dry-matter yield, nitrogen content and yield, numbers and weights of tillers, and proportion of crop fractions. Fertilizer Research 1, 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilman, D. & Wright, P. T. (1978 a). Dry-matter content, leaf water potential and digestibility of three grasses in the early stages of regrowth after defoliation with and without applied nitrogen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilman, D. & Wright, P. T. (1978 b). The proportions of cell content, nitrogen, nitrate-nitrogen and water-soluble carbohydrate in three grasses in the early stages of regrowth after defoliation with and without applied nitrogen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilman, D., Droushiotis, D., Koocheki, A., Lwoga, A. B. & Shim, J. S. (1976). The effect of interval between harvests and nitrogen application on the proportion and yield of crop fractions in four ryegrass varieties in the first harvest year. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilman, D., Daly, M., Koocheki, A. & Lwoga, A. B. (1977). The effect of interval between harvests and nitrogen application on the proportion and digestibility of cell wall, cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin and on the proportion of lignified tissue in leaf cross-section in two perennial ryegrass varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilman, D., Gao, Y. & Michaud, P. J. (1994). Morphology and position of the shoot apex in some temperate grasses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 122, 375–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar