Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:38:54.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietary effects on beef composition: II. Quantity and distribution of fat*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Summary

Studies were conducted on the quantity and distribution of fat in 104 half-sib Angus steers which had received various combinations of hay, corn silage, and corn concentrate. Groups were slaughtered at live weights of 216, 284, 340, 409, and 454 kg. The weights of mesenteric, cod, pelvic, kidney and total excess carcass fat were determined. Four linear measurements of subcutaneous fat, three cross-sectional area measurements of intermuscular fat, and the intramuscular fat in seven muscles were observed. The results showed that the feeding regimes had marked influences on the quantity and location of fat, particularly during the early feeding period (216–340 kg live wt.). Feeding hay during this period generally resulted in less fat deposition than feeding corn silage, but the suppression of intramuscular fat deposition was not evident until the animals were subsequently fed higher energy rations to heavier weights (409 and 454 kg). The results indicated that it may be possible to design dietary regimens that suppress waste fat but allow intramuscular fat to be deposited.

The results described above imply that one might influence the deposition of intramuscular fat by proper design of the diet in the early feeding period. Although this possibility exists, it is noted that quantities of chemically extractable fat are not identical with quantities of marbling fat and hence changes in the former may not alter the visible quality of the meat.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carroll, F. D., Ellsworth, J. David & Kroger, , Dietrich, . (1963). Compensatory carcass growth in steers following protein and energy restriction. J. Anim. Sci. 22, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrigus, R. R., Johnson, H. R., Thomas, N. W., Firth, N. L., Harrington, R. B. & Judge, M. D. (1969). Dietary effects on beef composition. I. Quantitative and qualitative carcass traits. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72, 289.Google Scholar
Guenther, J. J., Bushman, D. H., Pope, L. S. & Morrison, R. D. (1965). Growth and development of the major carcass tissues in beef calves from weaning to slaughter weight, with reference to the effect of plane of nutrition. J. Anim. Sci. 24, 1184.Google Scholar
Hankins, O. G., Gaddis, A. M. & Sulzbacher, W. L. (1959). Meat research techniques pertinent to animal production research. In Techniques and Procedures in Animal Production Research, Am. Soc Anim. Prod., p. 194.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. H., Hull, J. L., Weitkamp, W. H. & Bonilla, S. (1965). Compensatory growth responses of fattening steers following low energy intake regimes on hay or irrigated pasture. J. Anim. Sci. 24, 29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council (1963). Nutrient Requirements of beef cattle. Publ. 1137. Washington 25, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Ostle, B. (1963). Statistics in Research, 2nd ed.Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Zinn, Dale W., Montgomery, Ted. H., Belcher, , Gladys, & Kent, , Wendell, . (1963). Effects of length of feeding period on fat deposition and tenderness in the beef carcass. J. Anim. Sci. 22, 830. (Abstr.)Google Scholar