Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:34:23.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diallel analysis of yield and yield components of winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) D.C.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. N. De Silva
Affiliation:
The Post Graduate Institute of Agriculture, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
A. Omran
Affiliation:
The Post Graduate Institute of Agriculture, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

Summary

The variability revealed in a half-diallel cross between nine diverse genotypes of winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) D.C.) in regard to yield and yield components was studied in the F1 generation. The results indicated that high genetic variability existed for all traits. With respect to seed size, general combining ability effects alone were adequate to predict the performance of hybrids. For numbers of pods per plant and seeds per pod, both general and specific combining ability effects were of equal importance, while the performance of hybrids for grain yield was mainly dependent on specific combining ability effects. Heterosis was clearly evident for number of seeds per pod and grain yield. Of the yield components, number of pods per plant exhibited a positive genotypic association of appreciable magnitude with grain yield, showing its usefulness as an indicator of yield in selection.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aminah-Lubis, S. H. (1978). Flowering behaviour of the winged bean. In The Winged Bean, Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Winged Bean, 1978, Los Banos, Philippines.Google Scholar
Anon. (1975). The Winged Bean. A High Protein Crop for the Tropics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Baker, R. J. (1978). Issues in diallel analysis. Crop Science 18, 533536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cebny, K., Kordylas, F., Pospisil, F., Svabensky, O.Zajic, B. (1971). Nutritive value of winged bean(Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) D.C). British Journal of Nutrition 26, 293299.Google Scholar
Dudley, J. W.Moll, R. H. (1969). Interpretation and use of estimates of heritability and genetic variances in plant breeding. Crop Science 9, 257261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, W. (1981 a). Heritability and combining ability of vegetative and phenological characters of winged beans (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) D.C). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 503508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, W. (1981 b). Inheritance of some economics characters in winged bean. In Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Winged Bean, 1981, Colombo, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
Erskine, W.Bala, A. A. (1976). Crossing technique in winged bean. Tropical Grain Legume Bulletin 6, 3235.Google Scholar
Griffing, B. (1956 a). A generalized treatment of diallel crosses in quantitative inheritance. Heredity 10, 3150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffing, B. (1956 b). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Australian Journal of Biological Science 9, 463493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herath, H. M. W.Iruthayathas, E. E. (1981).Winged bean germplasm collection in Sri Lanka. In Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Winged Bean, 1981, Colombo, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar