Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:13:38.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of penis and sheath in young dairy bulls, and its relationship to age and body weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. R. Ashdown
B. R. Ashdown
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Anatomy, The University, Bristol 8
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Eighty-six bull calves (fifty-two Friesian, twenty-two Ayrshire, twelve Shorthorn) were examined at intervals, during the first year of life, by a method which allowed classification of the degree of adherence between penis and sheath into five classes.

2. Mean age and weight at which separation between penis and sheath commenced and was completed are recorded for each breed. Significant breed differences were found.

3. The rate of separation accelerates as development proceeds.

4. The relationships between age, body weight, and commencement and completion of separation in the Friesian bulls are analysed by correlation methods. These analyses suggest that both age and body weight are important in sexual development.

5. An equation is given for the linear regression of age at completion of separation on age and weight at commencement of separation and weight at 10 weeks for the Friesian bulls.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , February 1962 , pp. 65 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdel-Raouf, M. (1960). Acta Endocrin. 34 (Suppl.), 49.Google Scholar
Ashdown, R. R. (1957). J. Anat., Lond., 91, 596.Google Scholar
Ashdown, R. R. (1960 a). J. Agric. Sci. 54, 348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashdown, R. R. (1960 b). J. Anat., Lond., 94, 198.Google Scholar
Bailey, N. T. J. (1959). Statistical Methods in Biology. London: E.U.P.Google Scholar
Dun, R. B. (1955). Aust. Vet. J. 31, 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, H. O. (1952). Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Herdan, G. (1960). Small Particle Statistics, p. 170. 2nd ed.London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Johnstone, I. L. (1948). Aust. Vet. J. 24, 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streit, H. (1956). Inaugural Dissertation, München.Google Scholar
Watson, R. H., Sapsford, C. S. & McCance, I. (1956). Aust. J. Agric. Sci. 7, 574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, E. L. & Terrill, C. E. (1953). J. Anim. Sci. 12, 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar