Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:12:42.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of body components in Kenana cattle. 1. Development of carcass and non-carcass components of the body

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. S. E. Gaili  and
A. F. Y. M. Nour
E. S. E. Gaili
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Science, P.O. Box 32, Khartoum North, Sudan
A. F. Y. M. Nour
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Science, P.O. Box 32, Khartoum North, Sudan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Thirty-two weaned Kenana bull calves were adequately fed to maximize growth and serially slaughtered at predetermined live weights of approximately 100, 200, 300 and 400 kg. Eight animals were slaughtered at each slaughter point and slaughter data collected. Dressing-out percentage increased with the increase in slaughter weight but the increase was more marked between the first and the second slaughter points than between subsequent slaughter points. Kenana cattle compare favourably with Hereford, Hereford × Friesian, Friesian and Shorthorn × Ayrshire steers in dressing-out percentage; and are, apparently, superior to Jersey steers in that trait.

The model, y = axb, in the logarithmic form, was used to describe patterns of proportional weight increase of body components throughout the experimental period and in three arbitrary phases. The patterns of development which were demonstrated by some body components throughout the test period were not necessarily re-exhibited, in all stages, when development was considered in phases. These body components changed their patterns of proportional increase in weight as development proceeded.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 257 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alim, K. A. (1960). Reproductive rate and milk yield of Kenana cattle in the Sudan. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 55, 183–188.Google Scholar
Anon. (1966). A comparison of the growth of different types of cattle for beef production. Report of Major Beef Research Project, p. 21. London: The Royal Smithfield Club.Google Scholar
Boyns, B. M. (1947). Sudanese cattle as milk producers. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 15, 27–41.Google Scholar
Broadbent, P. J., Dodswobth, T. L., Ball, C. & Sampford, M. R. (1967). A comparison of semiintensively reared Charolais × Ayrshire and Shorthorn × Ayrshire cattle. Animal Production 9, 61–66.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. & Berg, R. T. (1966). A classification of bovine muscles based on their relative growth patterns. Research in Veterinary Science 7, 326–332.Google Scholar
El Nazir, A. E. T. (1977). The introduction of exotio dairy cattle blood for better milk production in the Sudan. Proceedings of the Eighth Veterinary Conference (ed. Mustafa, A. A. and Sanousi, S. M. El). Sudan Veterinary Association (in the Press).Google Scholar
Field, R. A. & Schoonover, C. O. (1967). Equations for comparing longissimus dorsi areas in bulls of different weights. Journal of Animal Science 26, 709 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Hattersley, M. C. (1951). Kenana cattle at the Gezira Research Farm. The East African Agricultural Journal 17, 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, J. (1932). Problems of Relative Growth. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Lofgreen, G. P., Meyer, J. H. & Ittner, N. R. (1960). Effects of time and level of supplementation on beef steers fed alfalfa soilage or hay. Journal of Animal Science 19, 156–163.Google Scholar
Macdearmid, A. & Preston, T. R. (1969). A note on the implantation of intensively-fed beef cattle with hexostrol. Animal Production 11, 419–422.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. H. L. & Everitt, G. C. (1968). Beef production from Jersey steers grazed in three different environments. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 158–176.Google Scholar
Palsson, H. & Verges, J. B. (1952). Effects of plane of nutrition on growth and development of carcass quality in lambs. I. The effects of high and low planes of nutrition at different ages. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 42, 1–92.Google Scholar
Prescott, J. H. D. & Lamming, G. E. (1964). The effects of castration on meat production in cattle, sheep and pigs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 63, 341–357.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. & Tulloh, N. M. (1966). The representation of yield of dressed carcass. Animal Production 8, 281–288.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956) Statistical Methods (5th ed.). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Tulloh, N. M. (1963). The carcass composition of sheep, cattle and pigs as functions of body weight. In Carcass Composition and Appraisal of Meat Animals. Teohnical Conference, University of Melbourne (ed. Tribe, P. E.), pp. 5–1 to 5–30. East Melbourne: C.S.I.R.O.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948). The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition. Parts II and III. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 38, 243–302.Google Scholar
Williamson, G. & Payne, W. J. A. (1960). An Introduction to Animal Husbandry in the Tropics, p. 150. London: Longmans.Google Scholar