Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:47:29.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of the effects of different tillage methods and irrigation levels on soybean yield and yield components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2022

E. Gonen Open the ORCID record for E. Gonen [Opens in a new window]  and
O. Kara
E. Gonen*
Affiliation:
Soil and Water Resources Research Unit, Alata Horticultural Research Institute, 33740 Erdemli, Mersin, Turkey
O. Kara
Affiliation:
Soil and Water Resources Research Unit, Alata Horticultural Research Institute, 33740 Erdemli, Mersin, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: E. Gonen, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the effects of different irrigation levels and different tillage and sowing methods on the amount of irrigation water, evapotranspiration, water productivity (WP) and yield in the second crop soybean in Çukurova Region, Turkey. Three irrigation levels were applied (I100: completion to the field capacity of the available water of 60 cm soil depth weekly. I70: 70% of the water applied to I100, I50: 50% of the water applied to I100), five tillage and sowing methods were used (T1: traditional soil tillage, T2: reduced soil tillage, T3: reduced soil tillage, T4: ridge tillage, T5: no-tillage). The research was carried out in a randomized block split-plot design with three replications. The result of, the highest yield was obtained in I100xT1 with 4990 kg/ha, while the lowest yield was obtained in I50xT3 with 3150 kg/ha in irrigation x tillage interactions. When the water consumption values of plants were analysed, the highest was obtained with 632 mm I100 and the lowest with 399 mm I50. When WP values were analysed, the highest was obtained with 8.7 in I50 and the lowest in 6.6 and I100. As a result, full irrigation and direct sowing methods (I100T1) are recommended in soybean cultivation considering the highest water-yield relationship in the Mediterranean Region.

Keywords

Deficit irrigationevapotranspirationsoil water contentwater productivityzero-tillage
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 160 , Issue 1-2 , February 2022 , pp. 76 - 85
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akcay, S and Dagdelen, N (2016) Water use efficiency, yield and yield components of second crop sunflower under deficit irrigation. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 21, 190–199.10.17557/tjfc.05690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alhameid, A, Ibrahim, M, Kumar, S, Sexton, P and Schumacher, TE (2017) Soil organic carbon changes impacted by crop rotational diversity under no-till farming in South Dakota, USA. Soil Science Society of America Journal 81, 868–877.10.2136/sssaj2016.04.0121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, VK, Singh, CB, Sidhu, AS and Thind, SS (2011) Irrigation, tillage and mulching effects on soybean yield and water productivity in relation to soil texture. Agricultural Water Management 98, 563–568.10.1016/j.agwat.2010.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydinsakir, K (2018) Yield and quality characteristics of drip-irrigated soybean under different irrigation levels. Agronomy Journal 110, 1473–1481.10.2134/agronj2017.12.0748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banziger, M, Edmeades, GO, Beck, D and Bellon, M (2002) Breeding for Drought and Nitrogen Stress Tolerance in Maize: From Theory to Practice. Mexico: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Barut, ZB, Ertekin, C and Karaagac, HA (2011) Tillage effects on energy use for corn silage in Mediterranean Coastal of Turkey. Energy 36, 5466–5475.10.1016/j.energy.2011.07.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brevedan, R and Egli, DB (2003) Short periods of water stress during seed filling, leaf senescence, and yield of soybean. Crop Science 43, 2083–2088.10.2135/cropsci2003.2083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busscher, WJ, Frederick, JR and Bauer, PJ (2000) Timing effects of deep tillage on penetration resistance and wheat and soybean yield. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 999–1003.10.2136/sssaj2000.643999xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candogan, BN, Sincik, M, Buyukcangaz, H, Demirtas, C, Goksoy, AT and Yazgan, S (2013) Yield, quality and crop water stress index relationships for deficit-irrigated soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in sub-humid climatic conditions. Agricultural Water Management 118, 113–121.10.1016/j.agwat.2012.11.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comlekcioglu, N and Simsek, M (2011) Effects of deficit irrigation on yield and yield components of vegetable soybean [Glycine max L. (Merr.)] in semi-arid conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology 10, 6227–6234.Google Scholar
Desclaux, D, Huynh, T and Roumet, P (2000) Identification of soybean plant characteristics that indicate the timing of drought stress. Crop Science 40, 716–722.10.2135/cropsci2000.403716xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djaman, K, Irmak, S, Rathje, WR, Martin, DL and Eisenhauer, DE (2013) Maize evapotranspiration, yield production functions, biomass, grain yield, harvest index, and yield response factors under full and limited irrigation. Transactions of the ASAE 56, 273–293.Google Scholar
Doorenbos, J and Kassam, AH (1979) Yield Response to Water. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33. Rome: FAO, p. 193.Google Scholar
Dos Santos, EL, Cattelan, AJ, Prete, CEC, Neumaier, N, Oliveira, MCN, Farias, JRB, Carvalho, JFC and Nepomuceno, AL (2012) Water stress affecting nodulation, oil, protein and grain yield of soybean cultivars. Global Science Technolgy 5, 109–120.Google Scholar
Eck, HV, Mathers, AC and Musick, JT (1987) Plant water stress at various growth stages and growth and yield of soybeans. Field Crops Research 17, 1–16.10.1016/0378-4290(87)90077-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2020) Soybean Production in the World, 2018. FAO. Available at http://www.faostat.fao.org/ (Last Accessed 21 February 2020).Google Scholar
Fereres, E and Soriano, MA (2007) Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. Special issue on ‘integrated approaches to sustain and improve plant production under drought stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 147–159.10.1093/jxb/erl165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, T, Derpsch, R and Kassam, A (2012) Overview of the global spread of conservation agriculture. Field Actions Science Reports. The Journal of Field Actions (Special Issue 6), 1–8.Google Scholar
Gajić, B, Kresović, B, Tapanarova, A, Životić, L and Todorović, M (2018) Effect of irrigation regime on yield, harvest index and water productivity of soybean grown under different precipitation conditions in a temperate environment. Agricultural Water Management 210, 224–231.10.1016/j.agwat.2018.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gajri, PR, Arora, VK and Prihar, SS (2002) Tillage for Sustainable Cropping. New York: Food Products Press, 203 pp.Google Scholar
Garcia, AG, Persson, T, Guerra, LC and Hoogenboom, G (2010) Response of soybean genotypes to different irrigation regimes in a humid region of the southeastern USA. Agricultural Water Management 97, 981–987.10.1016/j.agwat.2010.01.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giménez, L, Paredes, P and Pereira, LS (2017) Water use and yield of soybean under various irrigation regimes and severe water stress. Application of AquaCrop and SIMDualKc models. Water 9, 393.10.3390/w9060393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, JL and Prueger, JH (2011) Agroecology: implications for plant response to climate change. In Yadav, SS, Redden, RJ, Hatfield, JL, Lotze-Campen, H and Hall, AE (eds), Crop Adaptation to Climate Change. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, XQ, Han, QF and Jia, ZK (2009) Effects of different tillage practices in summer fallow period on soil water and crop water use efficiency in semi-arid areas. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas 5, 52–58.Google Scholar
Howell, TA (2001) Enhancing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. Agronomy Journal 93, 281–289.10.2134/agronj2001.932281xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huynh, HT, Hufnagel, J, Wurbs, A and Bellingrath-Kimura, SD (2019) Influences of soil tillage, irrigation and crop rotation on maize biomass yield in a 9-year field study in Müncheberg, Germany. Field Crops Research 241, 107565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irmak, S, Specht, JE, Odhiambo, L, Rees, JM and Cassman, KG (2014) Soybean yield, evapotranspiration, water productivity, and soil water extraction response to subsurface drip irrigation and fertigation. Transactions of the ASABE 57, 729–748.Google Scholar
Jha, PK, Kumar, SN and Ines, AV (2018) Responses of soybean to water stress and supplemental irrigation in upper Indo-Gangetic plain: field experiment and modeling approach. Field Crops Research 219, 76–86.10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadhem, FA, Specht, JE and Williams, JH (1985) Soybean irrigation serially timed during stages R1 to R6. II. Yield component responses. Agronomy Journal 77, 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karam, F, Masaad, R, Sfeir, T, Mounzer, O and Rouphael, Y (2005) Evapotranspiration and seed yield of field grown soybean under deficit irrigation conditions. Agricultural Water Management 75, 226–244.10.1016/j.agwat.2004.12.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirnak, H, Dogan, E and Turkoglu, H (2010) Effect of drip irrigation intensity on soybean seed yield and quality in the semi-arid Harran plain, Turkey. Spanish Journal of Agriculture Research 8, 1208–1217.10.5424/sjar/2010084-1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklík, P (2011) Preconsolidation, structural strength of soil, and its effect on subsoil upper structure interaction. Engineering Structures 33, 1195–1204.10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S, Dwivedi, SK, Kumar, R, Mishra, JS, Singh, SK, Prakash, V and Bhatt, BP (2017) Productivity and energy use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes under different tillage options in rainfed ecosystem of middle Indo-Gangetic plains. Indian Journal of Agronomy 62, 31–38.Google Scholar
Lampurlanes, BJ, Angas, P and Cantero-Martinez, C (2001) Root growth, soil water content and yield of barley under different tillage systems on two soils in semi-arid conditions. Field Crops Research 69, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H and Burton, JW (2002) Selecting increased seed density to increase indirectly soybean seed protein concentration. Crop Science 42, 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, F, Anderse, MN and Jensen, CR (2003) Loss of pod set caused by drought stress is associated with water status and ABA content of reproductive structures in soybean. Functional Plant Biology 30, 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maleki, A, Naderi, A, Naseri, R, Fathi, A, Bahamin, S and Maleki, R (2013) Physiological performance of soybean cultivars under drought stress. Bulletin of Environment Pharmacology and Life Science 2, 38–44.Google Scholar
Martínez-Valderrama, J, Ibáñez, J, Del Barrio, G, Sanjuán, ME, Alcalá, FJ, Martínez-Vicente, S, Ruiz, A and Puigdefábregas, J (2016) Present and future of desertification in Spain: implementation of a surveillance system to prevent land degradation. Science of the Total Environment 563, 169–178.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.065CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masuda, T and Goldsmith, PD (2009) World soybean production: area harvested, yield, and long-term projections. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 12, 1–20.Google Scholar
Oya, T, Nepomuceno, AL, Neumaier, N, Farias, JRB, Tobita, S and Ito, O (2004) Drought tolerance characteristics of Brazilian soybean cultivars- evaluation and characterization of drought tolerance of various Brazilian soybean cultivars in the field. Plant Production 7, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payero, JO, Melvin, SR and Irmak, S (2005) Response of soybean to deficit irrigation in the semi-arid environment of west-central Nebraska. Transactions of the ASAE 48, 2189–2203.10.13031/2013.20105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, P and Lauer, JG (2004) Response of soybean yield components to management system and planting date. Agronomy Journal 96, 1372–1381.10.2134/agronj2004.1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, HL, Gao, WS, Ma, YC, Ma, L and Yin, CM (2008) Effects of subsoiling on soil water under no-tillage 2 years later. Sci. Agric. Sin. 41, 78–85. Chinese Research Arid Areas 5, 52–58.Google Scholar
Ram, H, Singh, Y, Saini, KS, Kler, DS and Timsina, J (2013) Tillage and planting methods effects on yield, water use efficiency and profitability of soybean–wheat system on a loamy sand soil. Experimental Agriculture 49, 524–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneekloth, JP, Klocke, NL, Hergett, GW, Martin, DL and Clark, RT (1991) Crop rotations with full and limited irrigation and dryland management. Transactions of the ASAE 34, 2372–2380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, HD, Ferguson, JA and Wood, LS (1987) Water use, yield, and dry matter accumulation by determinate soybean grown in a Humid Region. Agronomy Journal 79, 870–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sentelhas, PC, Battisti, R, Câmara, GMS, Farias, JRB, Hampf, AC and Nendel, C (2015) The soybean yield gap in Brazil–magnitude, causes and possible solutions for sustainable production. Journal of Agriculture Science 153, 1394–1411.10.1017/S0021859615000313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simsek, M, Boydak, E, Gerçek, S and Kırnak, H (2001) Well as the different irrigation intervals under Harran Plain conditions and drip irrigation methods, sprinkler-irrigated soybeans detection of water yield relationships. Journal of Agriculture Science 3, 88–93.Google Scholar
Sincik, M, Candogan, BN, Demirtas, C, Buyucangaz, H, Yazgan, S and Goksoy, AT (2008) Deficit irrigation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in a sub-humid climate. Journal of Agronomy Crop Science 194, 200–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiciklas, KD, Mullen, RE, Carlson, RE and Knapp, AD (1992) Soybean seed quality response to drought stress and pod position. Agronomy Journal 84, 166–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soane, BD, Ball, BC, Arvidsson, J, Basch, G, Moreno, F and Roger-Estrade, J (2012) No-till in northern, western and south-western Europe: a review of problems and opportunities for crop production and the environment. Soil and Tillage Research 118, 66–87.10.1016/j.still.2011.10.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steduto, P, Hsiao, TC, Fereres, E and Raes, D (2012) Crop Yield Response to Water. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Steel, RGD and Torrie, JH (1980) Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 2nd Edn. New York: McGraw- Hill.Google Scholar
Tebrügge, F and Düring, RA (1999) Reducing tillage intensity a review of results from a long-term study in Germany. Soil and Tillage Research 53, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TUIK (2018) The Turkish Statistical Institute. Available at https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zul (The Last Accessed 1 December 2021).Google Scholar
Wang, S, Wang, H, Zhang, Y, Wang, R, Zhang, Y, Xu, Z and Li, J (2018) The influence of rotational tillage on soil water storage, water use efficiency and maize yield in semi-arid areas under varied rainfall conditions. Agricultural Water Management 203, 376–384.10.1016/j.agwat.2018.03.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wijewardana, C, Reddy, KR, Alsajri, FA, Irby, JT, Krutz, J and Golden, B (2018) Quantifying soil moisture deficit effects on soybean yield and yield component distribution patterns. Irrigation Science 36, 241–255.10.1007/s00271-018-0580-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilhelm, W, Doran, JW and Power, JF (1986) Corn and soybean yield response to crop residue management under no-tillage production systems. Publications from USDA-ARS/UNL Faculty 114, 1–8.Google Scholar
Wittwer, RA, Dorn, B, Jossi, W and van der Heijden, MG (2017) Cover crops support ecological intensification of arable cropping systems. Scientific Reports 7, 1–12.10.1038/srep41911CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yordanov, I, Velikova, V and Tsonev, T (2003) Plant 449 response to drought and stress tolerance. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology 29, 187–206.Google Scholar