Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:17:02.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crossing Subtropical Egyptian Sheep with Hampshire Improve their Lamb Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. M. Aboul
Affiliation:
Animal Production Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt
E. A. Afifi
Affiliation:
Animal Production Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt

Summary

This study was carried out to investigate the effect of crossing the subtropical fat-tailed Ossimi (O) sheep with the Hampshire (H) on ewe and lamb performance. Data used involved 457 ewe records of Ossimi, Hampshire and four crosses, and 404 lamb records of Ossimi and five crosses.

Hampshire ewes performed less well than the local Ossimi ewes in various reproduction traits. They weaned 0·26 lamb/ewe run with the rams compared with 0·82 from the local ewes mated to Hampshire rams. The Hampshire ewes seemed to be anoestrous during the first part of the normal breeding season of the local ewes (May–July). Different Hampshire–Ossimi cross-bred groups showed better ewe reproduction performance than the purebred Hampshire ewes, but were inferior to the Ossimi. The first cross ewes were, generally, the best among all the cross-bred ewes and the reproduction performance declined with increasing percentage of Hampshire genes. When the first cross was interbred, ewe performance declined clearly in the F2. All cross-bred groups of ewes gave significantly heavier annual greasy-fleece weight than Ossimi ewes.

The only lamb performance trait that was improved by up-grading the Ossiroi sheep with the Hampshire breed was the first greasy-fleece weight, while lamb survival and weaning weight were clearly decreased with the advance of up-grading.

The recombined cross-bred groups ( and ⅝ Hampshire) proved to be the best cross-bred and showed considerable improvement in lamb performance traits over the local Ossimi sheep, except for lamb survival.

It is concluded that crossing Ossimi sheep with the Hampshire improved only fleece weight but not lamb production.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboul-Naga, A. M. (1976). Location effect on the reproduction performance of three indigenous breeds of sheep under sub-tropical conditions of Egypt. Indian Journal of Animal Science 47, 2933.Google Scholar
Aboul-Naoa, A. M. (1978). Using Suffolk sheep for improving lamb production from sub-tropical Egyptian sheep. 1. Reproduction performance. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 125130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aboul-Naga, A. M., El-Shobokshy, A. S. & Gabr, M. G. (1980). Using Suffolk sheep for improving lamb production from subtropical Egyptian sheep. 3. Ewe lamb performance. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 333337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Shobokshy, A. S. & Aboul-Naga, A. M. (1978). Using Suffolk sheep for improving lamb production from sub-tropical Egyptian sheep. 2. Lamb and fattening performance. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 90 131137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmy, M. H., Galal, E. S. E., Ghanem, Y. S. & Khishin, S. S. (1969). Crossbreeding of sheep under semi-arid conditions. Animal Production 11, 351360.Google Scholar
Galal, E. S. E., Seoudy, A. M., Younis, A. A. & Kshishin, E. S. (1971). Feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of yearling Barki sheep and their crosses with Merino. Alexandria Journal of Agriculture Research 19, 1524.Google Scholar
Labban, F., Aboul-Naga, A. M., Farid, A. & Radwan, A. (1970). Lambing rates in 2 crossbred flocks of Hampshire and Suffolk sheep. Agriculture Research Review, Cairo 48, 4952.Google Scholar
MacFarlene, M. V. (1964). Terrestrial animals in dry heat, ungulates. In Handbook of Physiological Environment. Washington, D.C.: American Physiological Society.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission (1972). Sheep Improvement Scientific Study Group Report. Meat and Livestock Commission, 10. 1972.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture (1958). Improving local sheep production. Annual Technical Report of Animal Production Department, 1958. Cairo, Egypt: Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar