Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:01:32.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cotton growth and nutrient uptake following Temik aldicarb application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. M. Ragab
S. M. Ragab
Affiliation:
Soils Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Al Azhar, Cairo, Egypt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The feasibility of enhancing cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) growth and nutrient uptake with Temik aldicarb was investigated using sand culture with a continuous flow of 1/5 strength of Hoagland solution. Aldicarb was incorporated in the nutrient solution at different rates, and was applied to the plants when they were 30 days old for a period of 1, 3, 5, or 7 days. The cation exchange capacity of the fresh roots of treated plants as well as the ionic permeability of the untreated plants as influenced by aldicarb application were also studied. Low rate of aldicarb provided a stimulus effect on the plant and enabled it to grow faster and to take up more N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and Na than the control. This suggested a direct effect of aldicarb on mineral metabolism especially those processes involving N and P. Maximum dry-matter yield and nutrient uptake occurred at the 5 mg aldicarb rate for all times of treatments. At a rate of 7middot;5 mg aldicarb, growth and nutrient uptake were inhibited, suggesting a toxicity of assimilatory processes within the plant which might have reduced its ability to take up and assimilate nutrients. Aldicarb facilitated the transfer of Na to the stem and leaves resulting in a more uniform distribution of Na throughout the treated plants compared with the control.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 97 , Issue 3 , December 1981 , pp. 731 - 737
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bacon, O. G. (1960). Systemic insecticides applied to cut seed pieces and to soil at planting time to control potato insects. Journal of Economic Entomology 53, 835–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balasubramanian, A. & Narayanan, R. (1978). Proceedings, Symposium on Nuclear Techniques in Studies of Metabolism. Effects and degradation of pesticides, p. 19.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S. M. & Basu, A. C. (1957). Experiments with a systemic insecticide for control of Schoenbias incertulus (WIK) (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) a stem borer of paddy in West Bengal. Bulletin of Entomological Research 48, 299–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhan, K. C., Huffakeb, R. C., Bedri, A. A., Mueller, R. T., Jeffreys, R. A., Carmak, R. M., Biely, M. I. & Wallace, A. (1960). Possible relationships of bicarbonate or CO2, assimilation to cation accumulation by plant roots. Soil Science 89, 276–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouyer, T. C. & Hoagland, D. R. (1943). Metabolic activities of roots and their bearing on the relation of upward movement of salts and water in plants. American Journal of Botany 30, 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. E. (1957). Hessian fly control with systemic insecticides. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Bulletin of Plant Protection 5, 149–155.Google Scholar
Chao, S. T. (1950). Protection against aphids by seed treatment. Nature, London 166, 909–910.Google Scholar
Chapman, D. H. & Pratt, P. E. (1961). Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants, and Waters. University of California, Division of Agriculture Science, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Coppedge, J. R., Lindquist, D. A., Bull, D. L. & Dorough, H. W. (1967). Fate of 2-methyl 2(methylthio) propionaldehyde O-(methyl carbomoyl) oxime (Temik) in cotton plants and soil. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 15, 902–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacskaylo, J. & Erole, D. R. (1955). Compositional and physiological responses of the cotton plant to the systemic insecticides schradan and dimeton. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 821.Google Scholar
Hacskaylo, J. & Scales, A. C. (1959). Some effects of guthion alone and in combination with DDT and of a dieldrin-DDT mixture on growth and fruiting of the cotton plant. Journal of Economic Entomology 52, 396–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heintze, S. G. (1961). Studies on cation exchange capacity of roots. Plant and Soil 13, 365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, E. J. (1966). Sand and Water culture Methods used in the Study of Plant Nutrition. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, Bucks., England.Google Scholar
Jacoby, B. (1965). Sodium retention in excised bean stems. Physiologia Plantarum 18, 730–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klepper, B. & Kaufman, M. R. (1966). Removal of salt from xylem sap by leaves and stems of guttating plants. Plant Physiology 41, 1743–1747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuseke, D. W., Funke, B. R. & Schultz, J. T. (1974). Effects and resistance of Baygon (Propoxur) and Temik (Aldicarb) insecticides in soil. Plant and Soil 41, 235–269.Google Scholar
Letey, J., Lunt, G. R., Stolzy, L. H. & Szuskiewicz, T. E. (1961). Plant growth, water use, and nutritional response to rhizosphere differentials of oxygen concentration. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 25, 183–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, S., Funke, B. R. & Schultz, J. T. (1972). Effect of some organophosphorus and carbamate insecticides on nitrification and legume growth. Plant and Soil 37, 489–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, R. L., Fukuta, T. R., Collins, C., Brock, K. J., Reynolds, H. T. & Osman, M. F. (1966). Metabolism of 2-methyl-2-(methylthio) propionaldehyde 0-(methyl carbomoyl) oxime in plant and insect. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 14, 579–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayanan, R. & Balasubramanian, A. (1979). Effect of aldicarb on the growth, respiration, and metabolism of Azotobacter chroococcum. Journal of Environmental Science and Health B 4, 393–404.Google Scholar
Pearson, G. A. (1962). Sodium absorption and translocation by beans, peas, and cotton. Plant Physiology 37 (Supplement) X.Google Scholar
Peel, A. J. (1963). The movement of ions from the xylem solution into the sieve tubes of willow. Journal of Experimental Botany 14, 438–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selim, A. (1970). Uptake of Temik through cotton seedlings. Ain Shams University Research Bulletin 245.Google Scholar
Shone, M. G. T., Clarkson, D. T. & Sanderson, J. (1969). The absorption and translooation of Na by maize seedlings. Planta (Berlin) 86, 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stary, J. (1964). The Solvent Extraction of Metal Chelate, p. 3. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Willams, R. J. R. (1959). Coordination, Chelation, and Catalysis. The Enzymes (ed. Boyer, P. D. and Byrbak, K.), pp. 391–441. 2nd edn. New York: Academio Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. C. (1948). Diurnal fluctuation of growth length of tomato stem. Plant Physiology 23, 156–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed