Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:52:38.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The contribution of the conceptus to weight change in pregnant Merino ewes at pasture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. L. Wheeler ,
T. F. Reardon ,
D. A. Hedges  and
R. L. Rocks
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Seventy-nine pregnant Merino ewes grazing pasture at two intensities were slaughtered in groups at intervals from 60 days after conception to post-partum. Sixty-one nonpregnant ewes were also slaughtered. The weights of various organs including uteri and their contents were recorded and the energy content of each ewe was determined.

The weight of uterine contents (conceptus) increased rectilinearly with increasing foetal age to 100 days: differences between singles and twins were not significant. From 100 days to term, the relationship was also rectilinear but the slope was greater: a more rapid increase occurred with twins than with singles (P < 0·05). The nutritional difference imposed did not affect the relationship.

A regression of total energy reserve on live weight (less fleece and conceptus) was established. Differences between this relationship and those established separately for non-pregnant, pregnant and post-partum ewes were not significant.

The contribution of changes in conceptus weight to live-weight changes in gravid ewes is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , June 1971 , pp. 347 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. London: A.R.C.Google Scholar
Barcroft, J. (1945). The range of weights of foetal sheep at various ages. J. Physiol., Lond. 104, 32.Google Scholar
Bassett, J. M., Oxborrow, T. J., Smith, I. D. & Thorburn, G. D. (1969). The concentration of progesterone in the peripheral plasma of the pregnant ewe. J. Endocr. 45, 449–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L. & Rook, J. A. F. (1953). The heat of combustion of the tissues of cattle in relation to their chemical composition. Br. J. Nutr. 7, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cloete, J. H. L. (1939). Pre-natal growth in the Merino sheep. Ondersterpoort J. vet. Sci. Anim. Ind. 13, 417–558.Google Scholar
Coop, I. E. (1950). The effect of level of nutrition during pregnancy and during lactation on lamb and wool production of grazing sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 40, 311–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curson, H. H. & Malan, A. P. (1936). Studies in sex physiology. 17. The extent of the gravid Merino uterus in relation to the vertebral column in the dorsal recumbent position and the weights of the gravid uterus and foetus in relation to the general bodyweight. Ondersterpoort J. vet. Sci. Anim. Ind. 7, 261–74.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. (1968). The physical relationships of the abdominal organs in the pregnant ewe. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 70, 171–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, J. M. (1969). The effect of pregnancy and fatness on the volume of rumen contents in the ewe. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72, 119–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P. Q. & Dyer, A. J. (1954). Study of factors affecting sheep production. Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Stn. No. 558.Google Scholar
Huggett, A. St. G. & Widdas, W. F. (1951). The relationship between mammalian foetal weight and conception age. J. Physiol., Lond. 114, 306–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joubert, J. M. (1956). A study of pre-natal growth and development in sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 47, 382–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P. & Sutherland, H. A. M. (1968). An estimate of the nutrients utilized for pregnancy by Merino sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 22, 217–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malan, A. P. & Curson, H. H. (1937). Studies in sex physiology. 18. On the growth of the gravid uterus in the Merino. Ondersterpoort J. vet. Sci. Anim. Ind. 8, 417–27.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, J. C. & Robinson, T. J. (1957). Fat lamb studies in Victoria. II. The interaction between pre- and post-natal planes of nutrition on the production of wool and lambs by cross-bred sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 8, 471–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, H. M., Watson, R. H. & Wood, G. F. (1960). A crayon and associated harness for the detection of mating under field conditions. Aust. vet. J. 36, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, A. J. F. (1967). Nutrition of the pregnant ewe. Rep. Hill Fmg Res. Org. 1964–7 4, 59–68.Google Scholar
Schinckel, P. G. (1963). The potential for increasing efficiency of feed utilization through newer knowledge of animal nutrition, (c) Sheep and goat. Rep. World Conf. Anim. Prod. Rome 1, 199–248.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods. Iowa State College Press, 5th Edition.Google Scholar
Stephenson, S. K. (1959). Wool follicle development in the New Zealand Romney and N-type sheep. IV. Pre-natal growth and changes in body proportions. Aust. J. agric. Res. 10, 433–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, W. & Aitken, F. C. (1959). Diet in relation to reproduction and the viability of the young. Part II. Sheep: World survey of reproduction and review of feeding experiments. Commonw. Bur. Anim. Nutr. Tech. Comm. No. 20, Farnham Royal, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948a). The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition. Part I. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 38, 93–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948b). The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition. Part II. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 38, 243–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1955). Augmentation of fertility of Romney ewes with pregnant mare serum. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 45, 60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, O. B. & Chapman, R. E. (1966). Additional information on the dye-banding technique of wool growth measurement. J. Aust. Inst. agric. Sci. 32, 298–300.Google Scholar