Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:04:19.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Composition of Crude Fibre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. G. Norman
A. G. Norman
Affiliation:
(Biochemistry Section, Chemistry Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The crude-fibre determination is misleading, because the fraction obtained does not bear any definite relationship to the structural constituents of the material. The cellulose is partially attacked, and lignin extensively removed. Considerable variation is found in the lignin content of crude-fibre fractions. Highly lignified materials do not necessarily yield a crude fibre high in lignin.

Since the presence of lignin exercises a direct effect on the digestibility of the material, any empirical method should include all the lignin, and alkaline treatment must be avoided. Acid hydrolysis may be a possible alternative method, if a correction for protein be made in the case of materials high in nitrogen, and a determination of the lignin content made.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , October 1935 , pp. 529 - 540
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Crowther, C.J.R. agric. Soc. (1934), 95, 308.Google Scholar
(2)Norman, A. G. and Jenkins, S. H.Biochem. J. (1933), 27, 818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Norman, A. G. and Jenkins, S. H.Biochem. J. (1934), 28, 2147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Norman, A. G. and Jenkins, S. H.Biochem. J. (1934), 28, 2160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Remy, E.Biochem. Z. (1931), 236, 1.Google Scholar
(6)Williams, R. D. and Olmsted, W. H.J. biol. Chem. (1935), 108, 653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Woodman, H. E.Biol. Rev. (1930), 5, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Woodman, H. E. and Stewart, J.J. agric. Sci. (1932), 22, 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar