Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:34:23.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Complete diets for dairy cows: a comparison between complete diets and separate ingredients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. H. Phipps ,
J. A. Bines ,
Rosemary J. Fulford  and
R. F. Weller
R. H. Phipps
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
J. A. Bines
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
Rosemary J. Fulford
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
R. F. Weller
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

One hundred and ninety-four lactating British Friesian cows were used over a 2-year period to determine the effects of mixing diet ingredients on dry-matter (D.M.) intake, animal performance, digestibility coefficients, rumen fermentation and efficiency of food utilization. Four treatments were imposed in both years and were complete diet and separate ingredients at ad libitum and restricted levels of feeding.

In Expt 1 a complete diet at ad libitum and restricted levels of feeding was compared with separate ingredients. The diet consisted of 60% concentrates and 40% forage and contained 20, 20, 10 and 50% on a D.M. basis of maize silage, lucerne silage, dried sugar-beet pulp and dairy compound, respectively. Method and level of feeding were the same in Expt 2; however, the diet in the 2nd year consisted of 50% concentrates (40% dairy compound, 10% dried sugar-beet pulp) and 50% grass silage.

In Expt 1 cows fed the complete diet ad libitum consumed 16·5 kg D.M./day which was significantly more than the 14·3 kg/day consumed by those offered the separate ingredients ad libitum. Intakes in Expt 2 were not significantly affected by method of feeding. Much of the difference in Expt 1 was attributed to the fact that many cows rejected lucerne silage when fed in an unmixed form and therefore to keep the concentrate to forage ratio constant other diet ingredients were reduced proportionately.

Mixing diet ingredients did not significantly affect milk yields, which were for the complete diet ad libitum and restricted and the separate ingredients ad libitum and restricted 22·2, 22·2; 22·1 and 20·7 kg/day in Expt 1 and 23·6, 20·8; 24·2 and 21·5 kg/ day in Expt 2, respectively. In Expt 1 when the concentrate to forage ratio was 60:40, cows fed the complete diet ad libitum produced milk with a significantly higher milk fat concentration (39·2 g/kg) than those fed the separate ingredients (31·6 g/kg). Similar effects were not recorded in Expt 2 when the concentrate to forage ratio had been reduced to 50:50. Changes in milk protein concentration were more closely related to changes in intake rather than method of feeding. Mixing diet ingredients tended to decrease live-weight loss in early lactation and accelerate live-weight gain in midlactation.

In vivo digestibility coefficients determined in lactating dairy cows showed that in Expt 1 the D.M. and organic-matter digestibility coefficients for the complete diets fed ad libitum (0·689 and 0·713) were lower than those recorded (0·712 and 0·732) for the unmixed diet ad libitum. Although the digestibility coefficient of the acid-detergent fibre of the complete diet was markedly higher at 0·519 compared with 0·478 for the separate ingredients, the difference was not significant. In Expt 2 the only difference in digestibility coefficients was that for nitrogen, which for the complete diet was significantly higher than that of the separate ingredients at both levels of feeding.

At an ad libitum level of feoding in Expt 1, the molar proportions of acetate and butyrate were 620 and 116 mM/l for the complete diet which were slightly higher than 602 and 95 mM/1 for the separate ingredients ad libitum. This diet also had a slightly higher molar proportion of propionate, 249 compared with the 221 mM/l for the complete diet ad libitum. In Expt 2 there wore no significant differences between treatments for either molar proportions of rumen volatile fatty acids or the ratio of lipogenic to non-lipogenic acids.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , August 1984 , pp. 171 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balch, C. C, Bartlett, S. & Johnson, V. W. (1951). Apparatus for the separate collection of faeces and urine from cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 41, 98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bines, J. A. (1980 a). Systems for feeding cows in groups. Symposium on Feeding Strategies for Dairy Cows. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Bines, J. A. (1980 b). Dairy cows: the case for complete diet feeding. Span 23, 11–13.Google Scholar
Bines, J. A. & Davey, A. W. F. (1970). Voluntary intake, digestion, rate of passage, amount of material in the alimentary tract and behaviour in cows receiving complete diets containing straw and concentrates in different proportions. British Journal of Nutrition 24, 1013–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broster, W. H., Sutton, J. D. & Bines, J. A. (1978). Concentrate: forage ratios for high-yielding dairy cows. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition - 1978 (ed. Haresign, W. and Lewis, D.), pp. 99–126. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. (1969). The development of a complete diet for cattle. Animal Breeding Research Organisation Report, pp. 19–24.Google Scholar
Gill, M. (1979). The principles and practice of feeding ruminants on complete diets. Grass and Forage Science 34, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Reid, G. W. & Sarmiento, E. A. (1979). The utilisation by dairy cows of rations given as complete diets or separate feeds. 30th Annual Meeting European Association for Animal Production, Harrogate, 23–26 July 1979, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Holter, J. B., Urban, W. E., Hayes, H. H. & Davis, H. A. (1977). Utilisation of diet components fed blended or separately to lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 60, 1288–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. L. (1983). Influence of feeding pattern on the biological efficiency of high-yielding dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawalkar, V. N. & Patle, B. R. (1978). Utilisation of nutrients from complete rations by cross-bred Holstein × Tharparkar lactating cows. Indian Journal of Animal Science 48, 251–256.Google Scholar
Komkris, T., Stanley, R. W. & Morita, K. (1965). Effects of feeds containing molasses fed separately and together with roughage on digestibility of rations, volatile fatty acids produced in the rumen, milk production and milk constituents. Journal of Dairy Science 48, 714–719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, S. P. & Browning, C. B. (1969). Comparison of different methods of preparing and feeding rations to lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 52, 920 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Marshall, S. P. & Voigt, A. R. (1975). Complete rations for dairy cattle. 1. Methods of preparation and roughage-to-concentrate ratios of blended rations with corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science 58, 891–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants. Technical Bulletin No. 33. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1977). Complete Diet Feeding of Dairy Cows. London: Agricultural Development and Advisory Service.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1978). Second Year Report on Complete Diet Feeding of Dairy Cows. London: Agricultural Development and Advisory Service.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1979). Complete Diet Feeding of Dairy Cows. Supplementary Report on investigations carried out during 1978–1979. London: Agricultural Development and Advisory Service.Google Scholar
Muller, L. D., Harshbarger, K. E. & Oliver, E. F. (1967). Group feeding lactating dairy cows a complete feed mixture of corn silage and concentrates. Journal of Dairy Science 50, 965 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Owen, J. B. (1975). Complete diets for dairy cows. In Simplified Feeding for Milk and Beef, pp. 87–93. London: US Feed Gains Council.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B., Miller, E. L. & Bridge, P. S. (1968). A study of the voluntary intake of food and water and the lactation performance of cows given diets of varying roughage content ad libitum. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 70, 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J. B., Miller, E. L. & Bridge, P. S. (1969). Complete diets given ad libitum to dairy cows - the effect of level of inclusion of milled straw. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. R., Whitelaw, F. G., Aitken, J. N., MacDearmid, A. & Charleston, E. B. (1963). Intensive beef production. 1. Performance of cattle given complete ground diets. Animal Production 5, 47–51.Google Scholar
Rickaby, C. D. (1979). Development in complete diet feeding. Agricultural Development and Advisory Service Quarterly Review 34, 195–211.Google Scholar
Stanley, R. W. & Morita, K. (1967). Effect of frequency and method of feeding on performance of lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 50, 585–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. D. (1981). Concentrate feeding and milk composition. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition - 1981 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 35–48. London: Butterworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. D. & Johnson, V. W. (1969). Fermentation in the rumen of cows given rations containing hay and flaked maize or rolled barley in widely different proportions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 73, 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villavicencio, E., Rusoff, L. L., Girouard, R. E. & Waters, W. H. (1968). Comparison of complete feed rations to a conventional ration for lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 51, 1633–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar