Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T09:23:35.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classification of sugarcane varieties using visible/near infrared spectral reflectance of stalks and multivariate methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2018

A. J. Steidle Neto ,
D. C. Lopes Open the ORCID record for D. C. Lopes [Opens in a new window] ,
J. V. Toledo ,
S. Zolnier  and
T. G. F. Silva
A. J. Steidle Neto
Affiliation:
Federal University of São João del-Rei, Campus Sete Lagoas, Rodovia MG 424, km 47, Sete Lagoas, 35701-970, Minas Gerais, Brazil
D. C. Lopes*
Affiliation:
Federal University of São João del-Rei, Campus Sete Lagoas, Rodovia MG 424, km 47, Sete Lagoas, 35701-970, Minas Gerais, Brazil
J. V. Toledo
Affiliation:
Federal University of Viçosa, Av. Peter Henry Rolfs, s/n, Viçosa, 36570-000, Minas Gerais, Brazil
S. Zolnier
Affiliation:
Federal University of Viçosa, Av. Peter Henry Rolfs, s/n, Viçosa, 36570-000, Minas Gerais, Brazil
T. G. F. Silva
Affiliation:
Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Unidade Acadêmica de Serra Talhada, Serra Talhada, 56900-000, Pernambuco, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: D. C. Lopes, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The use of fast and non-destructive techniques for identifying sugarcane varieties enables the development of automatic sorting systems, contributing towards improving pre-processing steps in the alcohol and sugar industries. In this context, principal component analysis (PCA), factorial discriminant analysis (FDA), stepwise forward discriminant analysis (SFDA) and partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were used to classify four Brazilian sugarcane varieties based on visible/near infrared (Vis/NIR) spectral reflectance measurements (450–1000 nm range) of stalks. All wavelengths contributed towards discriminating the sugarcane varieties, but the 600–750 nm range was most relevant. When evaluating PCA results considering the four sugarcane varieties, two of them overlapped and it was only possible to use classifiers of three varieties. Factorial discriminant analysis, PLS-DA and SFDA reached correct classifications of 0.81, 0.82 and 0.74, respectively, when considering the external validation data and the four sugarcane varieties evaluated. Results showed that Vis/NIR spectroscopy combined with discriminating methods is a promising tool for non-destructive and fast sugarcane variety classification, which can be used in the agro-food industry or directly in the field.

Keywords

ChemometricsSaccharum officinarum L.spectroscopy
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 156 , Issue 4 , May 2018 , pp. 537 - 546
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ballabio, D and Consonni, V (2013) Classification tools in chemistry. Part 1: linear models. PLS-DA. Analytical Methods 5, 3790–3798.Google Scholar
Ballabio, D and Todeschini, R (2009) Multivariate classification for qualitative analysis. In Sun, DW (ed.) Infrared Spectroscopy for Food Quality Analysis and Control. New York: Elsevier, pp. 83–104.Google Scholar
Berrueta, LA, Alonso-Salces, RM and Héberger, K (2007) Supervised pattern recognition in food analysis. Journal of Chromatography A 1158, 196–214.Google Scholar
Bertrand, D, Courcoux, P, Autran, JC, Meritan, R and Robert, P (1990) Stepwise canonical discriminant analysis of continuous digitalized signals: application to chromatograms of wheat proteins. Journal of Chemometrics 4, 413–427.Google Scholar
Bourennane, H, Couturier, A, Pasquier, C, Chartin, C, Hinschberger, F, Macaire, JJ and Salvador-Blanes, S (2014) Comparative performance of classification algorithms for the development of models of spatial distribution of landscape structures. Geoderma 219–220, 136–144.Google Scholar
Bro, R and Smilde, AK (2014) Principal component analysis. Analytical Methods 6, 2812–2831.Google Scholar
Cheavegatti-Gianotto, A, de Abreu, HMC, Arruda, P, Bespalhok Filho, JC, Burnquist, WL, Creste, S, di Ciero, L, Ferro, JA, Figueira, AVO, Filgueiras, TS, Grossi-de-Sá, MF, Guzzo, EC and Hoffman, HP (2011) Sugarcane (Saccharum x officinarum): a reference study for the regulation of genetically modified cultivars in Brazil. Tropical Plant Biology 4, 62–89.Google Scholar
Cozzolino, D, Cynkar, WU, Shah, N and Smith, P (2011) Multivariate data analysis applied to spectroscopy: potential application to juice and fruit quality. Food Research International 44, 1888–1896.Google Scholar
de Carvalho, LC, de Morais, CDLM, de Lima, KMG, Júnior, LCC, Nascimento, PAM, de Faria, JB and de Almeida Teixeira, GH (2016) Determination of the geographical origin and ethanol content of Brazilian sugarcane spirit using near-infrared spectroscopy coupled with discriminant analysis. Analytical Methods 8, 5658–5666.Google Scholar
Devaux, MF, Bertrand, D, Robert, P and Qannari, M (1988) Application of multidimensional analyses to the extraction of discriminant spectral patterns from NIR spectra. Applied Spectroscopy 42, 1015–1019.Google Scholar
dos Santos, JM, Duarte Filho, LSC, Soriano, ML, da Silva, PP, Nascimento, VX, Barbosa, GVS, Todaro, AR, Ramalho Neto, CE and Almeida, C (2012) Genetic diversity of the main progenitors of sugarcane from the RIDESA germplasm bank using SSR markers. Industrial Crops and Products 40, 145–150.Google Scholar
Everingham, YL, Lowe, KH, Donald, DA, Coomans, DH and Markley, J (2007) Advanced satellite imagery to classify sugarcane crop characteristics. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 27, 111–117.Google Scholar
Fortes, C and Demattê, JAM (2006) Discrimination of sugarcane varieties using Landsat 7 ETM+ spectral data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 27, 1395–1412.Google Scholar
Galvão, LS, Formaggio, AR and Tisot, DA (2005) Discrimination of sugarcane varieties in southeastern Brazil with EO-1 Hyperion data. Remote Sensing of Environment 94, 523–534.Google Scholar
Giambanelli, E, Ferioli, F, Koçaoglu, B, Jorjadze, M, Alexieva, I, Darbinyan, N and D'Antuono, LF (2014) A comparative study of bioactive compounds in primitive wheat populations from Italy, Turkey, Georgia, Bulgaria and Armenia. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 93, 3490–3501.Google Scholar
Gitelson, AA and Merzlyak, MN (2004) Non-destructive assessment of chlorophyll, carotenoid and anthocyanin content in higher plant leaves: principles and algorithms. In Stamatiadis, S, Lynch, JM and Schepers, JS (eds), Remote Sensing for Agriculture and the Environment. Larissa, Greece: Ella, pp. 78–94.Google Scholar
Johnson, RM, Viator, RP, Veremis, JC, Richard, EPR Jr and Zimba, PV (2008) Discrimination of sugarcane varieties with pigment profiles and high resolution, hyperspectral leaf reflectance data. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 28, 63–75.Google Scholar
Karoui, R, Dufour, E and De Baerdemaeker, J (2007) Front face fluorescence spectroscopy coupled with chemometric tools for monitoring the oxidation of semi-hard cheeses throughout ripening. Food Chemistry 101, 1305–1314.Google Scholar
Kottek, M, Grieser, J, Beck, C, Rudolf, B and Rubel, F (2006) World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 15, 259–263.Google Scholar
Kramer, R (1998) Chemometric Techniques for Quantitative Analysis. New York, USA: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Li, X and He, Y (2008) Discriminating varieties of tea plant based on Vis/NIR spectral characteristics and using artificial neural networks. Biosystems Engineering 99, 313–321.Google Scholar
Martens, H and Naes, T (1992) Multivariate Calibration. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Martínez-Pinilla, O, Guadalupe, Z, Ayestarán, B, Pérez-Magarino, S and Ortega-Heras, M (2013) Characterization of volatile compounds and olfactory profile of red minority varietal wines from La Rioja. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 93, 3720–3729.Google Scholar
Martini, DZ, de Aragão, LEOC, Sanches, ID, Galdos, MV, da Silva, CRU and Dalla-Nora, EL (2018) Land availability for sugarcane derived jet-biofuels in São Paulo – Brazil. Land Use Policy 70, 256–262.Google Scholar
Misaki, M, Kim, Y, Bandettini, PA and Kriegeskorte, N (2010) Comparison of multivariate classifiers and response normalizations for pattern-information fMRI. Neuroimage 53, 103–118.Google Scholar
Monakhova, YB, Godelmann, R, Hermann, A, Kuballa, T, Cannet, C, Schäfer, H, Spraul, M and Rutledge, DN (2014) Synergistic effect of the simultaneous chemometric analysis of 1H NMR spectroscopic and stable isotope (SNIF-NMR, 18O, 13C) data: application to wine analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta 833, 29–39.Google Scholar
Moscetti, R, Haff, RP, Stella, E, Contini, M, Monarca, D, Cecchini, M and Massantini, R (2015) Feasibility of NIR spectroscopy to detect olive fruit infested by Bactrocera oleae. Postharvest Biology and Technology 99, 58–62.Google Scholar
Pholpho, T, Pathaveerat, S and Sirisomboon, P (2011) Classification of longan fruit bruising using visible spectroscopy. Journal of Food Engineering 104, 169–172.Google Scholar
RIDESA (2010) Rede Interuniversitária para Desenvolvimento do Setor Sucroalcooleiro. Catálogo Nacional de Variedades ‘RB’ de Cana-de-açúcar. Curitiba, Brazil: Rede Interuniversitária para o Desenvolvimento do Setor Sucroalcooleiro. Available at http://www.canaufv.com.br/catalogo/catalogo-2010.pdf (Accessed 14 June 2018).Google Scholar
Santiago, TR, Pereira, VM, de Souza, WR, Steindorff, AS, Cunha, BADB, Gaspar, M, Fávaro, LCL, Formighieri, EF, Kobayashi, AK and Molinari, HBC (2018) Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression profile analysis of expansins gene family in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). PLoS ONE 13, e0191081.Google Scholar
Saporta, G (2006) Probabilités, Analyse des Données et Statistique. Paris, France: Editions Technip.Google Scholar
Savitzky, A and Golay, MJE (1964) Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Analytical Chemistry 36, 1627–1639.Google Scholar
Serranti, S, Cesare, D, Marini, F and Bonifazi, G (2013) Classification of oat and groat kernels using NIR hyperspectral imaging. Talanta 103, 276–284.Google Scholar
Silva, ALBO, Pires, RCM, Ribeiro, RV, Machado, EC, Blain, GC and Ohashi, AYP (2016) Development, yield and quality attributes of sugarcane cultivars fertigated by subsurface drip irrigation. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 20, 525–532.Google Scholar
Steidle Neto, AJ, Toledo, JV, Zolnier, S, Lopes, DC, Pires, CV and da Silva, TGF (2017) Prediction of mineral contents in sugarcane cultivated under saline conditions based on stalk scanning by Vis/NIR spectral reflectance. Biosystems Engineering 156, 17–26.Google Scholar
Su, WH, He, HJ and Sun, DW (2017) Non-destructive and rapid evaluation of staple foods quality by using spectroscopic techniques: a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 57, 1039–1051.Google Scholar
Verma, AK, Garg, PK and Prasad, KSH (2017) Sugarcane crop identification from LISS IV data using ISODATA, MLC, and indices based decision tree approach. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 10, 16.Google Scholar
Wagih, ME, Musa, Y and Ala, A (2004) Fundamental botanical and agronomical characterisation of sugarcane cultivars for clonal identification and monitoring genetic variations. Sugar Tech 6, 127–140.Google Scholar
Wanitchang, P, Terdwongworakul, A, Wanitchang, J and Nakawajana, N (2011) Non-destructive maturity classification of mango based on physical, mechanical and optical properties. Journal of Food Engineering 105, 477–484.Google Scholar
Yuan, L, Huang, Y, Loraamm, RW, Nie, C, Wang, J and Zhang, J (2014) Spectral analysis of winter wheat leaves for detection and differentiation of diseases and insects. Field Crops Research 156, 199–207.Google Scholar
Zhou, Z, Huang, J, Wang, J, Zhang, K, Kuang, Z, Zhong, S and Song, X (2015). Object-oriented classification of sugarcane using time-series middle-resolution Remote Sensing data based on adaboost. PLoS ONE 10, e0142069.Google Scholar