Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:15:31.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes occurring in cattle as a consequence of selection for growth rate in a stressful environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. E. Frisch
J. E. Frisch
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O., Tropical Cattle Research Centre, P.O. Box 542, Rockhampton, Queensland 4700, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Since 1966 a closed line of Hereford × Shorthorn cattle (selected line) has been selected principally for growth rate under conditions of moderate to high environmental stress. Responses in growth rate were measured over the years 1970–5 as differences from an unselected control line. Birth weight declined but live weight at all other ages increased.

Groups of animals were taken from each line in 1976 and 1977 and used to determine the reasons for the differences in growth rate. Growth rate of the groups was measured when they were exposed to several different levels of stress, namely, the plane of nutrition, high ambient temperature, infection with bovine infectious keratoconjunctivitis(BIK) or gastro-intestinal helminths. The selected line was shown to be more heat tolerant, to have lower maintenance requirements and greater resistance to infection with BIK and helminths and, in consequence, always had higher growth rates in the presence of these stresses. However, they did not have superior growth rate at low levels of these stresses. Thus, selection had not increased the components associated with growth potential, and the improvement in growth rate was achieved entirely through increases in resistance to environmental stresses which affected growth rate.

The application of these findings to selection for growth rate, particularly in harsh environments, is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 96 , Issue 1 , February 1981 , pp. 23 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. (1962). The basal expenditure of energy. In The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Clapperton, J. L. & Wainman, F. W. (1966). The extent of differences between six British breeds of sheep in their metabolism, feed intakes and utilization, and resistance to olimatic stress. British Journal of Nutrition 20, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonsma, J. C. & Skinner, J. D. (1969). Factors influencing birth date, birth weight and preweaning growth rate of Afrikander, Bonsmara and Hereford cattle in the subtropics. Proceedings of the South African Society of Animal Production 8, 161–163.Google Scholar
Burns, W. C., Koger, M., Butts, W. T., Pahnish, O. F. & Blackwell, R. L. (1979). Genotype by environment interaction in Hereford cattle. II. Birth and weaning traits. Journal of Animal Science 49, 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butts, W. T., Koger, M., Pahnish, O. F., Burns, W. C. & Warwick, E. J. (1971). Performance of two Lines of Hereford cattle in two environments. Journal of Animal Science 33, 923–932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, H. D., Clyburn, T. M. & McCormick, W. C. (1969). Selection of beef cattle for single traits. Journal of Animal Science 29, 225–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalton, D. C. & Morris, C. A. (1978). A review of central performance testing of beef bulls and of recent research in New Zealand. Livestock Production Science 5, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1977). Nutritional influences on the outcome of selection. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36, 47–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconer, D. S. & Latyszewski, M. (1952). The environment in relation to selection for size in mice. Journal of Genetics 51, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, S. H. & Ensminger, M. E. (1960). Interactions between genotype and plane of nutrition in selection for rate of gain in swine. Journal of Animal Science 19, 434–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, J. E. (1975). The relative incidence and effect of bovine infectious keratoconjunctivitis in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle. Animal Production 21, 265–274.Google Scholar
Frisch, J. E. & Vercoe, J. E. (1977). Food intake, eating rate, weight gains, metabolic rate and efficiency of feed utilization in Bos taurus and Bos indicus crossbred cattle. Animal Production 25, 343–358.Google Scholar
Frisch, J. E. & Vercoe, J. E. (1978 a). Utilizing breed differences in growth of oattle in the tropics. World Animal Review 25, 8–12.Google Scholar
Frisch, J. E. & Vercoe, J. E. (1978 b). Genotype – environment interactions in growth of cattle – their ocourrence, explanation and use in the genetic improvement of growth. 5th World Conference on Animal Production, Buenos Aires (in the Press).Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC, Searle, T. W. & Griffiths, D. A. (1974). Basal metabolic rate in lambs and young sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 957–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jinks, J. L. & Connolly, V. (1973). Selection for speoific and general response to environmental differences. Heredity 30, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, R. M., Gregory, K. E. & Cundiff, L. V. (1974). Selection in beef cattle. II. Selection response. Journal of Animal Science 39, 459–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koger, M., Burns, W. C., Pahnish, O. F. & Butts, W. T. (1979). Genotype by environment interactions in Hereford cattle. I. Reproductive traits. Journal of Animal Science 49, 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korkman, N. (1961). Selection for size in mice in different nutritional environments. Hereditas 47, 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Y. I., Hansen, C. T., Chung, C. S. & Chapman, A. B. (1966). Influence of feeding regime on the effects of selection for postweaning gain in the rat. Genetics 54, 1315–1327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plasse, D. (1973). Crossing zebu, native, and European breeds in Venezuela and other parts of Latin America. In Crossbreeding Beef Cattle Series 2 (ed. Koger, M., Cunha, T. J. and Warnick, A. C.). Gainesville: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Plasse, D., Warnick, A. C. & Koger, M. (1968). Reproductive behaviour of Bos indicus females in a subtropical environment. I. Puberty and ovulation frequency in Brahman and Brahman × British heifers. Journal of Animal Science 27, 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. H. S. & O'Sullivan, P. J. (1950). Methods for egg counts and larval cultures for strongylus infecting the gastro-intestinal tract of cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1, 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. (1979). sysnova Version 9. Reference Manual: C.S.I.R.O. Animal Research Laboratory Technical Paper (in the Press).Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M., Springell, P. H. & O'Kelly, J. C. (1971). Alterations in host metabolism by the specific and anorectic effects of the oattle tick (Boophilus microplus). I. Food intake and body weight growth. Australian Journal of Biological Science 24, 373–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seifert, G. W. (1971). Ecto- and endoparasitic effects on the growth rates of zebu crossbred and British cattle in the field. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 839–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seifert, G. W. (1975). Effectiveness of selection for growth rate in zebu × British crossbred cattle. I. Proweaning growth. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trail, J. C. M., Buck, N. G., Light, D., Rennie, T. W., Rutherford, A., Miller, M., Pratchett, D. & Crapper, B. S. (1977). Productivity of Africander, Tswana, Tuli and crossbred beef cattle in Botswana. Animal Production 24, 57–62.Google Scholar
Turner, H. G. (1962). Effect of clipping the coat on performance of calves in the field. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 13, 180–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, H. G. (1964). Coat changes of cattle in relation to adaptation. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 5, 181–187.Google Scholar
Turner, H. G. & Schleger, A. V. (1960). The significance of coat type in cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 645–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, H. G. & Short, A. J. (1972). Effects of field infestations of gastrointestinal helminths and of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) on growth of three breeds of cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vercoe, J. E. (1970 a). The fasting metabolism of Brahman, Africander and Hereford × Shorthorn cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 24, 599–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vercoe, J. E. (19706). Fasting metabolism and heat increment of feeding in Brahman × British and British cattle. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals(ed.Schurch, A. and Wenk, C.), pp. 85–88. E.A.A.P. Publication No. 13. Juris, Zurich.Google Scholar