Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T05:21:31.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in the baseline of the Crop Water Stress Index for lucerne (Medicago sativa) over 3 years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. A. Rechel ,
W. R. DeTar  and
D. Ballard
E. A. Rechel
Affiliation:
Cotton Research Station, 17053 North Shafter Ave., Shafter, California 93263, USA
W. R. DeTar
Affiliation:
Cotton Research Station, 17053 North Shafter Ave., Shafter, California 93263, USA
D. Ballard
Affiliation:
Cotton Research Station, 17053 North Shafter Ave., Shafter, California 93263, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The ability to detect and measure water stress accurately is critical for optimizing crop production. The Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI), the linear relationship of the difference between foliage and air temperatures as a function of the air vapour pressure deficit, is one widely used method. Under well-watered conditions, a ‘baseline’ is derived that is crop specific and presumed fairly constant, despite differences in development and physiology. This study reports changes in the baseline of the CWSI for lucerne crops not subjected to water shortage over 3 years. Studies of lucerne in California from April 1986 to October 1988 used the CWSI to plan irrigations. It was necessary to re-establish the baseline periodically throughout the experiment. In the first year it was similar to that reported in the literature, but in the second year it had a statistically significant steeper slope and higher intercept. In the third year, the regression equation was similar to that in the first year. The changes in the baseline are thought to be a result of crop age rather than year-to-year weather fluctuations. The baseline needs to be determined periodically as the crop matures, to ensure accurate interpretation of plant water stress.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 116 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 63 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, M. J., Fries, G. F., Kopland, D. V. & Waldo, D. R. (1973). Effect of cutting date on digestibility and intake of irrigated first-crop alfalfa hay. Agronomy Journal 65, 357–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgardt, B. R. & Smith, D. (1962). Changes in estimated nutritive value of herbage of alfalfa, medium clover, ladino clover, and bromegrass due to stage of maturity and year. Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station Report 10.Google Scholar
Burke, J. J., Mahan, J. R. & Hatfield, J. L. (1988). Cropspecific thermal kinetic windows in relation to wheat and cotton biomass production. Agronomy Journal 80, 553–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idso, S. B. (1982). Non-water-stressed baselines: a key to measuring and interpreting plant water stress. Agricultural Meteorology 27, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idso, S. B., Jackson, R. D., Pinter, P. J., Reginato, R. J. & Hatfield, J. L. (1981 a). Normalizing the stress-degreeday parameter for environmental variability. Agricultural Meteorology 24, 45–55.Google Scholar
Idso, S. B., Reginato, R. J., Reicosky, D. C. & Hatfield, J. L. (1981 b). Determining soil-induced plant water potential depression in alfalfa by means of infrared thermometry. Agronomy Journal 73, 826–830.Google Scholar
Kirkham, M. B., Johnson, D. E., Kanemasu, E. T. & Stone, L. R. (1983). Canopy temperature and growth of differentially irrigated alfalfa. Agricultural Meteorology 29, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marten, G. C., Buxton, D. R. & Barnes, R. F. (1988). Feeding value (forage quality). In Alfalfa and Alfalfa Improvement (Eds Hanson, A. A., Barnes, D. K. & Hill, R. R.), pp. 463–492. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Rechel, E. A., Meek, B. D., Detar, W. R. & Carter, L. M. (1990). Fine root development of alfalfa (Medicago saliva L.) as affected by wheel traffic. Agronomy Journal 82, 618–622.Google Scholar
Sharratt, B. S., Baker, D. G. & Sheaffer, C. C. (1987). Climatic effect on alfalfa dry matter production. II. Summer harvests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 39, 121–129.Google Scholar
Smith, D. (1964). Chemical composition of herbage with advance in maturity of alfalfa, medium red clover, ladino clover, and birdsfoot trefoil. Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report 16.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar