Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:47:32.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calcium and phosphorus balances with laying birds1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Cyril Tyler  and
James Stuart Willcox
Cyril Tyler
Affiliation:
University of Reading
James Stuart Willcox
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. A series of balance experiments to compare calcium carbonate, calcium sulphate and calcium gluconate as sources of calcium for laying hens is described.

2. Not one of the three supplements showed all-round superiority, but calcium sulphate was the worst.

3. The main results indicate that:

(a) Calcium sulphate and gluconate cause scouring but carbonate does not.

(b) The best retention of calcium occurs with gluconate and the worst with sulphate.

(c) Calcium carbonate gives the best shells and calcium sulphate the worst.

4. The experiments also throw fresh light on some more general aspects of calcium and phosphorus metabolism.

5. On the basis of these general results and a review of the literature of blood calcium and phosphorus in laying hens a theory dealing with certain aspects of egg-shell formation is presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , January 1942 , pp. 43 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, B. (1908). Proc. R. Soc. Med. 1, 291.Google Scholar
Benjamin, H. R. (1933). J. biol. Chem. 100, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, H. R. & Hess, A. F. (1933). J. biol. Chem. 103, 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, E. & Hogben, L. (1933). Quart. J. exp. Physiol. 23, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Common, R. H. (1932). J. agric. Sci. 22, 576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Common, R. H. (1933). J. agric. Sci. 23, 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Common, R. H. (1936). J. agric. Sci. 26, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Common, R. H. (1938). J. agric. Sci. 28, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Common, R. H. (1940). J. agric. Sci. 30, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, R. M. (1939). Poult. Sci. 18, 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correll, J. T. & Hughes, J. S. (1933). J. biol. Chem. 103, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deobald, H. J., Christiansen, J. B., Hart, E. B. & Halpin, J. C. (1938). Poult. Sci. 17, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emslie, A. R. G. (1934). Imp. Bur. Anim. Nutr. Tech. Comm. no. 5.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. G., Hughes, J. S. & Scott, H. M. (1937). Poult. Sci. 16, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, D. M., Larson, C. E., Pearson, P. B. & Burmester, B. R. (1936). Poult. Sci. 15, 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halnan, E. T. (1925). J. Nat. Poult. Inst. 10, 410.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. S., Titus, R. W. & Smits, B. L. (1927). Science, 65, 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, J. E., Dutcher, R. A. & Knandel, H. C. (1933). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol, N.Y., 31, 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaupp, B. F. & Ivey, J. C. (1923). J. agric. Res. 23, 721.Google Scholar
Keith, M. H., Card, L. E. & Mitchell, H. H. (1927). J. agric. Res. 34, 759.Google Scholar
Knowles, F., Watkin, J. E. & Hendry, F. W. F. (1933). J. agric. Sci. 23, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laskowski, M. (1933). Biochem. Z. 260, 230.Google Scholar
Laskowski, M. (1934). Biochem. Z. 273, 284.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. L. & Mitchell, J. H. (1938). Poult. Sci. 17, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, H. (1934). Proc. Oklahoma Acad. Sci. 14, 32.Google Scholar
Richards, M. B. & Godden, W. (1924). Analyst, 49, 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddle, O. & Reinhart, W. H. (1926). Amer. J. Physiol. 76, 660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roepke, R. R. & Hughes, J. S. (1935). J. biol. Chem. 108, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, W. C. & MacDonald, F. G. (1929). J. biol. Chem. 84, 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, W. C., Howard, C. H. & Hess, A. F. (1930). Science, 72, 506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. W. & Russell, W. C. (1935). J. agric. Res. 51, 663.Google Scholar
Tyler, C. (1940). Biochem. J. 34, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willcox, J. S. (1934). J. agric. Sci. 24, 636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwarenstein, H. & Shapiro, H. A. (1933). J. exp. Biol. 10, 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar