Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:20:39.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The apparent digestibility of maize grain when given in various physical forms to adult sheep and cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. F. Wilson ,
N. N. Adeeb  and
R. C. Campling
G. F. Wilson
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashfor, Kent
N. N. Adeeb
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashfor, Kent
R. C. Campling
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashfor, Kent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A series of digestibility trials was conducted with non-lactating cows and adult castrated male sheep given diets of hay and dried or high-moisture maize grain in various physical forms. Sheep were able to digest all forms of maize well and to a greater extent than cows. In cows considerable variation in digestibility of maize was associated with the particle size of the maize and the individual animal. Maximum digestibility of dried maize in cows ensued when the modulus of fineness lay within the range 4·7–3·0 and with high moisture maize from 5·4 to 5·1. A study was made of the effect of particle size on the rate of digestion of maize suspended in nylon bags in the rumen. Evidence was presented showing the importance of rumination in ensuring the digestion of intact kernels. Possible causes of differences between cows in their ability to digest intact maize kernels are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , April 1973 , pp. 259 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Society or Agricultural Engineers (1967). Recommendation A.S.A.E.K 2461. Method of determining modulus of uniformity and modulus of fineness of ground feed. A.S.A.E. Yearbook 1967 p. 301.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. (1971). Proposal to use time spent chewing as an index of the extent to which diets for ruminants possess the physical property of fibrousness characteristic of roughages. Br. J. Nutr. 26, 383–92.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. & Cowie, A. T. (1962). Permanent rumen fistulae in cattle. Cornell Vet. 52, 206–14.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wainman, F. W. (1964). The utilisation of the energy of different rations by sheep and cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 63, 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, E. J. (1956). The rate of passage of food-stuffs through the alimentary tract of the goat. Br. J. Nutr. 10, 15–23.Google Scholar
Christian, K. R. & Coup, M. R. (1954). Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep. VI. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces. N. Z. Jl. Sci. Technol. 36, 328–30.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W. (1933). The comparative feeding values for livestock of barley, oats, wheat, rye and corn. Rep. Can. Nat. Res. Coun. no. 28.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, G. F. & Basson, W. D. (1970). The influence of physical form on the utilisation of maize grain. Proc. S. Afr. Soc. Anim. Prod. 9, 141–43.Google Scholar
Evans, J. L. & Colburn, M. W. (1967). Disappearance in the rumen of grain dry matter in different physical forms. J. Dairy Sci. 50, 394–96.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. D., Swift, R. W., Bratzler, J. W., Black, A., Thacker, J., French, C. E., Marcy, L. F., Elliott, R. F. & Moore, H. P. (1943). Conditions affecting the digestibility and the metabolisable energy of feeds for cattle. Bull. Pa. agric. Exp. Stn, no. 452.Google Scholar
Gerken, H. J., Wise, M. B., Harvey, R. W. & Barrick, E. R. (1971). Whole corn, liquid supplements and polyethylene for beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 32, 379–80.Google Scholar
Hixon, D. L., Hatfield, E. E. & Lamb, P. E. (1969). Comparison of whole shelled corn with cracked corn in cattle finishing diets. J. Anim. Sci. 29, 161–62.Google Scholar
Itikawa, O., Hoshino, T. & Itoh, M. (1964). Histochemical studies on the feed tissues in the ruminal fluids (Report II), especially on the alteration of the corn-seed put in the artificial ruminal fistula of the goat. Tohoku J. agric. Res. 15, 211–39.Google Scholar
Kick, C. H., Gerlaugh, P., Schalk, A. F. & Silver, E. A. (1937). The effect of mechanical processing of feeds on the mastication and rumination of steers. J. agric. Res. 55, 587–97.Google Scholar
Milbourn, G. M. (1971). Maize for Grain; a grower's handbook.London: Home Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Morrison, F. B. (1956). Feeds and Feeding, p. 57. Churton, Iowa: Morrison.Google Scholar
Schalk, A. F. & Amadon, R. S. (1928). Physiology of the ruminant stomach (bovine). Bull. N. Dak. agric. Expl Stn, no. 216.Google Scholar
Shaw, R. S. & Norton, A. W. (1906). Feeding whole grain. Bull. Mich, agric. Coll. Exp Stn, no. 242.Google Scholar
Silver, E. A. (1931). Feed grinder investigations. Bull. Ohio agric. Exp. Stn, no. 490.Google Scholar
Watson, C. J. (1949). The evaluation of Canadian cattle feeds. Proc. 5th Congr. Int. de Zootechnie, pp. 19–26. Paris.Google Scholar
White, T. W. & Hembrey, F. G. (1971). Shelled and ground corn rations for steers. J. Anim. Sci. 35, 305.Google Scholar
Wilbur, J. W. (1933). Grinding grains for dairy cows. Res. Bull. Purdue Univ. agric. Exp. Stn, no. 372.Google Scholar