Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:11:32.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of Merino wool quality:I. The incidence of coarse fibres in two Australian Merino flocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. R. Gallagher  and
N. T. M. Yeates
J. R. Gallagher
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock Husbandry, The University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W., Australia
N. T. M. Yeates
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock Husbandry, The University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W., Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The fibre length and diameter distributions of the wool of two Merino flocks were evaluated at the neck, mid-side and breech positions, to determine the incidence of fibres which were off-type by reason of excessive length, diameter or possession of a medulla.

The ranges of fibre lengths for 10·5–11·0 months' growth were 1·0–17·5 cm. in flock 1 and 1·0–16·5 cm in flock 2. There was no evidence of a bi-modal length distribution in either flock.

Fibre diameters at 15–16 months were observed in the range 6–69 μ in flock 1 and 5–52 μ in flock 2. Medullated fibres ranged from 7 to 50 μ in flock 1 and 5–64 μt in flock 2. The incidence of medullation increased in an antero-posterior direction from 0·17 to 0·28% in flock 1 and 0·11 to 0·28% in flock 2.

Tests for homogeneity of variance were applied to the estimates of fleece characters in this study as well as estimates of other workers. From these comparisons it is suggested that sheep in the present study are representative of the Merino breed in staple length, fibre diameter and to a lesser extent crimp frequency. The considerable between-animal variation in the observed incidence of medullation should aid in selection against that character with a consequent improvement in wool quality.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , February 1970 , pp. 91 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auber, L. (1950). The anatomy of follicles producting wool fibres, with special reference to keratinization. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 62, 191–254.Google Scholar
Babritt, J. & King, A. T. (1931). Biochem. J. 25, 1075, cited by Blackburn, S. (1948).Google Scholar
Bartlett, M. S. (1937). Supplement to Jl R. statist. Soc. 4, 137.Google Scholar
Beattie, A. W. (1961). Relationships among productive characters of Merino sheep in north-western Queensland. Qd J. agric. Sci. 18, 437–45.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. (1948). The composition and reactivity of medullated keratins. Biochem. J. 43, 114–17.Google Scholar
Bosman, V. (1934). The fibre fineness of South African Merino wool. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Ind. 3, 223–31.Google Scholar
Campbell, W. K. & Lang, W. R. (1967). Australian lambs' wool. The dimensional characteristics of Geelong samples. Text. Inst. Ind. (1967), 191–94.Google Scholar
Caster, H. B. (1958). Science and the Woolgrower, a lecture at the Royal Institution, Albemarle Street, London, 18th 02.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. E. (1960). C.S.I.R.O. Aust. Anim. Res. Lab. Tech. Pap. No. 3.Google Scholar
Duerden, J. E. & Bosman, V. (1931). Fibre lengths, thicknesses and qualities in a single wool staple. 17th. Rep. Vet. Res. Un. S. Afr., 771–9.Google Scholar
Duerden, J. E. & Palmer, E. W. (1932). Staple length variation and distribution in the fleece of the Merino. 18th. Rep. Vet. Res. Vn. S. Afr., pp. 991–1003.Google Scholar
Duerden, J. E. & Ritchie, M. (1924). Kemp fibres in the Merino. Sci. Bull. No. 34 Un. S. Afr.Google Scholar
Duerden, J. E. & Seale, P. M. (1927). A new type of fibre in the Merino. J. Text. Inst. 18, T265–73.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11, 1–42.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. R. (1970). An evaluation of Merino Wool Quality. II. An estimate of the incidence of coarse fibres in Australian Merino wool. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 74, 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, M. A. & Lyne, A. G. (1956). The pre-natal development of wool follicles in Merino sheep. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 9, 423–41.Google Scholar
Hausmann, L. A. (1920). Am. Nat. 54, 496–523. Cited by Lang (1950).Google Scholar
Henderson, A. E. (1964). Proc. Symp. Biology of the Skin and Hair Growth. Canberra, Sydney. Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
Koncar, L. & Smalcelj, I. (1952). The wool fineness and percentage of medullated fibres in wool of lambs 1–6 months old. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 21, 61–4.Google Scholar
Lang, W. R. (1944). A survey of the fibre fineness of Australian Merino wool. Publs. No. 5. Gordon Inst. Teohnol.Google Scholar
Lang, W. R. (1950). Non-kempy medullated fibres in Australian wool. J. Text. Inst. 41, T 309–20.Google Scholar
Lang, W. R. & Chaudhri, A. M. (1948). A note on the interpretation on Merino staple length measurements. J. Text. Inst. 39, T 249–52.Google Scholar
Marston, H. R. (1955). ‘Wool growth’ in Progress in the Physiology of Farm Animals. J. Hammond. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Morley, F. H. W. (1951). Selection for economic charracters in Australian Merino sheep. 1. Estimates of phenotypic and genetic parameters. Sci. Bull. Dep. Agric. N.S.W. no. 73.Google Scholar
Morley, F. H. W. (1955). Selection for economic characters in Australian Merino sheep. V. Further estimates of phenotypic and genetic parameters. Aust. J. agric. Res. 6, 77–90.Google Scholar
Peryman, R. V., Henderson, A. E. & McMahon, P. R. (1952). Corriedale hogget wools. N.Z. Jl Sci. Technol. A34, 47–58.Google Scholar
Rae, A. L. (1948). Some aspects of progeny testing in sheep. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 97–104.Google Scholar
Reimers, J. H. W. & Swart, J. C. (1929). Variations in diameter and crimp of wool of different parts of the body of Merino sheep. Sci. Bull. No. 83 Un. S. Afr. Dept. Agr.Google Scholar
Roberts, N. F. & Dunlop, A. A. (1957). Relations between crimp and fineness in Australian Merinos. Aust. J. agric. Res. 8, 524–46.Google Scholar
Rudall, K. M. (1947). X ray studies of the distribution of protein chain types in the vertebrate epidermis. Biochim. biophys. Acta, 1 549–62.Google Scholar
Rudall, K. M. (1955). The size and shape of the papilla of wool follicles. Proc. Int. Wool Text. Conf., Aust. F 9–31.Google Scholar
Spöttel, W. (1925). Ueber variabilitat, korrelative beziehungen und verebung der haarfeinheit bei schafen. Biblthca genet. 7, 1–235.Google Scholar
Turner, H. N. (1956). Measurement as an aid to selection in breeding sheep for wool production. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 24, 87–118.Google Scholar
Wildman, A. B. (1954). The Microscopy of Animal Textile Fibres. Wool Inds. Res. Ass. Leeds.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. F. (1928). Macroscopical detection of the medullated wool fibre. Science, N.Y. LXVII, 1742, 512–13.Google Scholar
Young, S. S. Y. & Chapman, R. E. (1958). Fleece characters and their influence on wool prodution per unit area of skin in Merino sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 9, 363–72.Google Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. (1965). Modern Aspects of Animal Production. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar