Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:06:44.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An analysis of carcass measurements of post-war British bacon pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. Harrington  and
R. W. Pomeroy
G. Harrington
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Unit of Animal Reproduction, School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
R. W. Pomeroy
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Unit of Animal Reproduction, School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

(a) Measurements made on sides of bacon exhibited since the war at the National Pig Breeders' Association carcass shows at Stirling and Peterborough and on various commercial sides have been analysed to investigate differences between the shows, the years and the sexes.

(b) In the Large White exhibits the sides from gilts were on average longer, thicker in the belly, thinner in back fat and with better developed eye muscles than the sides from hogs.

(c) The area of the eye muscle of the carcasses entered in these shows between 1948 and 1952 shows an unexplained decrease over this period. The width of the eye muscle is the only character showing a definite show difference, being larger at Stirling than at Peterborough.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , April 1955 , pp. 431 - 451
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aunan, W. J. & Winters, L. M. (1949). J. Anim. Sci. 8, 182.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A. & Coles, J. H. (1946). Sci. Agric. 26, 265.Google Scholar
Bishop, G. R. H. (1937). The Improvement of Bacon Pigs by Co-operative Methods. Reports of travelling scholars in agriculture No. 4, College of Estate Management, London.Google Scholar
Bonsma, F. N. (1939). Publ. Univ. Pretoria Agric. no.48.Google Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1935). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 3, 80.Google Scholar
Clausen, H. (1953). The Improvement of Pigs. The Queen's University, Belfast.Google Scholar
Cummings, J. M. & Winters, L. M. (1951). Tech. Bull. Minn. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 195.Google Scholar
Davidson, H. R., Hammond, J., Swain, J. B. & Wright, N. L. (1936). Pig Breed. Annu. 16, 49.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1948). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 10th ed.Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Fredeen, H. T. (1953). Publ. Dep. Agric. Can. no. 889.Google Scholar
Gatherum, D. P. (1954). Private communication.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1933). Pig Breed. Annu. 13, 28.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. & Murray, G. N. (1937). J. Agric. Sci. 27, 394.Google Scholar
Hankins, O. G. & Ellis, N. R. (1934). J. Agric. Res. 48, 257.Google Scholar
Hazel, L. N. (1943). Genetics, 28, 476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazel, L. N. & Kline, E. A. (1952). J. Anim. Sci. 11, 313.Google Scholar
Jarl, F. (1939). Z. Tierz. ZüchtBiol. 44, 48.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. & Korkman, N. (1950). Acta Agric. Scand. 1, 62.Google Scholar
Joubert, D. M. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 5.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. (1948). The Advanced Theory of Statistics. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Lush, J. L. (1936). Res. Bull. Ia. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 204.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1939). J. Agric. Sci. 29, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940). J. Agric. Sci. 30, 276.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1941). J. Agric. Sci. 31, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palsson, H. & Vergés, J. B. (1952). J. Agric. Sci. 42, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, R. D. & Murray, J. A. (1935). Sci. Agric. 16, 169.Google Scholar
Stothart, J. G. (1937). Publ. Dep. Agric. Can. no. 550; Tech. Bull. no. 6.Google Scholar
Stothart, J. G. (1938). Sci. Agric. 19, 162.Google Scholar
Whiteman, J. V. & Whatley, J. A. (1953). J. Anim. Sci. 12, 591.Google Scholar
Willman, J. P. & Krider, J. L. (1943). J. Anim. Sci. 2, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E., Evans, R. E., Callow, B. H. & Wishart, J. (1936). J. Agric. Sci. 26, 546.Google Scholar
Yates, F. (1933). J. Agric. Sci. 23, 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, F. (1934). J. Amer. Statist. Ass. 29, 51.Google Scholar