Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-h2j7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T06:23:22.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Agroclimatic and spectral regionalization for soybean in different agricultural settings in the state of Paraná, Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2024

P. P. Gasparin*
Affiliation:
Federal Technological University of Paraná (Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, UTFPR), Avenida Brasil, 4232, 85884-000, Medianeira, Paraná, Brazil
E. M. da Silva
Affiliation:
State University of Western Paraná (Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, UNIOESTE), Rua Universitária, 2069, 85819-110, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil
W. R. Becker
Affiliation:
State University of Western Paraná (Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, UNIOESTE), Rua Universitária, 2069, 85819-110, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil
A. Paludo
Affiliation:
State University of Western Paraná (Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, UNIOESTE), Rua Universitária, 2069, 85819-110, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil
L. P. C. Guedes
Affiliation:
State University of Western Paraná (Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, UNIOESTE), Rua Universitária, 2069, 85819-110, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil
J. A. Johann
Affiliation:
State University of Western Paraná (Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, UNIOESTE), Rua Universitária, 2069, 85819-110, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: P. P. Gasparin; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Information related to the climate, sowing time, harvest, and crop development is essential for defining appropriate strategies for agricultural activities, which helps both producers and responsible bodies. Paraná, the second largest soybean producer in Brazil, has high climatic variability, which greatly influences planting, harvesting, and crop productivity periods. Therefore, the objective of this study was to regionalize the state of Paraná, considering decennial metrics associated with climate variables and the enhanced vegetation index (EVI) during the soybean cycle. Individual and global analyses of these metrics were conducted performed using multivariate techniques. These analyses were carried out in agricultural scenarios with low, medium, and high precipitation, corresponding to harvest years 2011/2012, 2013/2014, and 2015/2016, respectively. The results obtained from the scores of the retained factors and the cluster analysis were the profile of the groups, with Group 1 presenting more favourable climatic and agronomic conditions for the development of soybean crops for the three harvest years. The opposite occurred for Groups 2 (2011/2012 and 2013/2014) and Group 3 (2015/2016). During the soybean reproductive phases (R2 – R5), precipitation values were inadequate, especially for Group 2 (2011/2012 and 2013/2014) with high water deficit, resulting in a drop in soybean productivity. The climatic and agronomic regionalization of Paraná made it possible to identify the regions most suitable for growing soybeans, the effect of climatic conditions on phenological stages, and the variability of soybean productivity in the three harvest years.

Type
Climate Change and Agriculture Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andrade, ARS, Silva, EG, Vieira, AP, Silva, MBG, Santos, WM and Silva, MGS (2021) Factor analysis in the identification of factors for the obtainment of climatological index. Journal of Environmental Analysis and Progress 06, 7999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anselin, L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association -LISA. Geographical Analysis 27, 91115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldisera, RS and Dallacort, R (2017) Influência das variáveis climáticas declinação solar, fotoperíodo e irradiação no topo da atmosfera em regiões agricultáveis do Brasil. Revista de Ciências Agroambientais 15, 109115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, WR, Johann, JA, Richetti, J and Silva, LCA (2017) Data mining techniques for separation of summer crop based on satellite. Engenharia Agrícola 37, 750759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, WR, Richetti, J, Mercante, E, Esquerdo, JCDM, Silva Junior, CA, Paludo, A and Johann, JA (2020) Agricultural soybean and corn calendar based on moderate resolution satellite images for southern Brazil. SEMINA. Ciências agrárias 41, 24192428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergamaschi, H (2017) ÁGUA. In Bergamaschi, H, Bergonci, JI (eds). As Plantas E O Clima: Principios E Aplicações. Guaiba: Agrolivros, pp. 256282.Google Scholar
Bianchi, VR, Oliveira, SC, Pinto, LB, Andreoli, AC and Garnica, GB (2016) Grouping of municipalities the middle Paranapanema according to the local agricultural production: a multivariate approach. Espacios 37, 1626.Google Scholar
Borrmann, D, Junqueira, RM, Sinnecker, P, Gomes, MSO, Castro, IA and Marquez, UML (2009) Chemical and biochemical characterization of soybean produced under drought stress. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos 29, 676681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calinski, T and Harabasz, JA (1974) A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communication in Statistics Theory and Methods 3, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charrad, M, Ghazzali, N, Boiteau, V and Niknafs, A (2022). Determining the Best Number of Clusters in a Data Set. Repository CRAN.Google Scholar
Cohen, I, Zandalinas, SI, Huck, C, Fritschi, FB and Mittler, R (2021) Meta-analysis of drought and heat stress combination impact on crop yield and yield components. Physiologia Plantarum 171, 6676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CONAB – Companhia Nacional de Supply (2012) Monitoring the Brazilian harvest: Grains. 2011/12 harvest. Ninth survey. Agricultural Monitoring. Available at https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras (Accessed July 2020).Google Scholar
CONAB – Companhia Nacional de Supply (2016) Monitoring the Brazilian harvest: Grains. 2015/16 harvest. Ninth survey. Agricultural Monitoring. Available at (Accessed July 2020).Google Scholar
CONAB – Companhia Nacional de Supply (2021) Monitoring the Brazilian harvest: Grains. 2020/21 harvest. Ninth survey. Agricultural Monitoring. Available at https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras (Accessed June 2021).Google Scholar
Corea, F (2019) An Introduction to Data: Everything You Need to Know About AI, Big Data and Data Science. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damásio, BF (2012) Use of exploratory factor analysis in psychology. Psychological Assessment 11, 213228.Google Scholar
Davies, DL and Bouldin, DW (1979) A cluster separation measure. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1, 0227.Google ScholarPubMed
Doorenbos, J and Kassam, AH (1979) Yield Response to Water. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO irrigation and drainage).Google Scholar
Dunn, J (1974) Well separated clusters and optimal fuzzy partitions. Journal Cybernetics 1, 95104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ECMWF – European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (2012) Available at http://old.ecmwf.int/about/corporat_brochure/leaflets/Corporate-brochure-2012-en.pdf (Accessed May 2018).Google Scholar
Eklundh, L and Jönsson, P (2015) TIMESAT: a software package for time-series processing and assessment of vegetation dynamics. In Kuenzer, C., Dech, S and Wagner, W (eds.), Remote Sensing Time Series. Cham: Springer International Publishin, pp. 141158.Google Scholar
EMBRAPA SOJA (2011) Soybean Production Technologies – Central Region of Brazil 2012 and 2013. Brasília: Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation. National Soy Research Center, 264pp.Google Scholar
Esquerdo, JCDM, Zullo Júnior, J and Antunes, JFG (2011) Use of NDVI/AVHRR time series profiles for soybean crop monitoring in Brazil. International Journal of Remote Sensing. London 32, 37113727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESRI (2018) ArcGIS for Windows Version 10.3. License type ArcInfo. ESRI - Environmental Systems Research Institute.Google Scholar
Farias, JRB, Nepomuceno, AL and Neumaier, N (2007) Soybean Ecophysiology. Londrina: EMBRAPA-CNPSo, 9. (EMBRAPA-CNPSo. Technical Circular, 48).Google Scholar
Fehr, WR and Caviness, CE (1977) Stages of Soybean Development. Ames: Iowa State University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Ferreira, DF (2018) Análise Multivariada, 3rd ed. Lavras: UFLA.Google Scholar
Fontana, DC, Berlato, MA, Lauschner, MH and Mello, RW (2001) Soybean yield estimation model in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. Brazilian Agricultural Research 36, 399403.Google Scholar
Gebert, DMP, Kist, A and Virgens Filho, JS (2018) Determination of homogeneous rainfall regions in the state of Paraná using multivariate and geostatistical analysis techniques. Brazilian Journal of Climatology 23, 374388.Google Scholar
Grzegozewski, DM, Johann, JA, Uribe-Opazo, MA, Mercante, E and Coutinho, AC (2016) Mapping soya bean and corn crops in the State of Paraná, Brazil, using EVI images from the MODIS sensor. International Journal of Remote Sensing 37, 12571275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzegozewski, DM, Cima, EG, Uribe-Opazo, MA, Johann, JA and Guedes, LPC (2020) Spatial and multivariate analysis of soybean yield in the state of Paraná-Brazil. Journal of Agricultural Studies 8, 387412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hair, JF, Black, WC, Babin, BJ and Anderson, RE (2014) Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Halkidi, M, Vazirgiannis, M and Batistakis, I (2000) Quality Scheme Assessment in the Clustering Process. Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hubert, LJ and Levin, JR (1976) A general statistical framework for assessing categorical clustering in free recall. Psychological Bulletin 83, 10721080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBGE – Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (2012) Aggregated database - IBGE Automatic Recovery System – SIDRA. Available at: http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br (Accessed Set 2018).Google Scholar
IBGE – Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (2014) Aggregated database - IBGE Automatic Recovery System – SIDRA. Available at: http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br (Accessed Set 2018).Google Scholar
IBGE – Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (2015) Aggregated database - IBGE Automatic Recovery System – SIDRA. Available at: http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br (Accessed Set 2018).Google Scholar
IBGE – Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (2016) Aggregated database - IBGE Automatic Recovery System – SIDRA. Available at: (Accessed Set 2018).Google Scholar
IBGE – Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (2018) States Available at: (Accessed September 2018).Google Scholar
Johann, JA, Rocha, JV, Oliveira, SEM, Rodrigues, LHA and Lamparelli, RAC (2013) Data mining techniques for identification of spectrally homogeneous areas using NDVI temporal profiles of soybean crops. Agricultural Engineering 33, 511524.Google Scholar
Johann, JA, Becker, WR, Uribe-Opazo, MA and Mercante, E (2016) Use of images from the Modis orbital sensor to estimate dates in the soybean crop development cycle. Agricultural Engineering 35, 115.Google Scholar
Kaiser, HF (1958) The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 23, 187200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaster, M and Farias, JRB (2011) Regionalization of VCU tests - cultivation value and use of soybean cultivars. In Embrapa, Soy (ed.), XXXII Soy Research Meeting in the Central Region of Brazil. São Pedro: Embrapa Soja.Google Scholar
Krüger, CAMB, Fontana, DC and Melo, RW (2007) Estimation of soybean grain yield in Rio Grande do Sul using a regionalized agrometeorological-spectral model. Brazilian Journal of Agrometeorology 15, 210219.Google Scholar
Krzanowski, WJ and Lai, YT (1988) A criterion for determining the number of groups in a data set using sum-of-squares clustering. Biometrics 44, 2334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X and Anselin, L (2023) R Library for Spatial Data Analysis. Repository CRAN. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgeodaGoogle Scholar
Llano, MP, Vargas, W and Naumann, G (2012) Climate variability in areas of the world with high production of soya beans and corn: its relationship to crop yields. Meteorological Applications 19, 385396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, AR, Marcolin, J, Johann, JA, Vilas Boas, MA and Schuelter, AR (2019) Identification of homogeneous rainfall zones during grain crops in Paraná, Brazil. Agricultural Engineering 6, 707714.Google Scholar
MacQueen, J (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
MAPA – Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (2022). Good agricultural practices for the production of safe food. Secretariat of Innovation, Sustainable Development and Irrigation. Available at https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/sustentabilidade/boas-praticas-agricolas/publicacoes-tecnicas/livro-boas-pratica-agricolas-para-a-producao-de-alimentos-seguros.pdf (Accessed May 2024).Google Scholar
Mathur, M (2015) Spatial autocorrelation analysis in plant population: an overview. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 7, 501513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matzenauer, R, Radin, B and Maluf, JRT (2017) O fenômeno ENOS e o regime de chuvas no Rio Grande do Sul. Agrometeoros 25, 323331.Google Scholar
NASA – National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2019). Technical specifications: Moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS). (Accessed September 2019).Google Scholar
Nascimento, L JR, Silvestre, MR and Neto, JLS (2020) Trends and rainfall tropicalization in Paraná State, south of Brazil. Atmosfera 33, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumaier, N, Nepomuceno, AL and Farias, JRB (2021) Climate Risk Zoning for Soybeans. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Soja. Available at https://www.embrapa.br/agencia-de-informacao-tecnologica/cultivos/soja/pre-producao/caracteristicas-da-especie-e-relacoes-com-o-ambiente/zoneamento-agroclimatico/zoneamento-de-risco-climatico-a-soja (Accessed May 2024).Google Scholar
Oliveira, JRT and Padovani, CR (2017) Analysis of the interrelationship of agricultural productivity and climatic characteristics in the southeast region of the State of Mato Grosso, using multivariate techniques. Engineering and Science 2, 112.Google Scholar
Paludo, A, Becker, WR, Richetti, J, Silva, LCA and Johann, JA (2020) Mapping summer soybean and corn with remote sensing on Google Earth Engine cloud computing in Parana state – Brazil. International Journal of Digital Earth 13, 16241636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, AR, Angelocci, LR and Sentelhas, PC (2002) Agrometeorology: fundamentals and practical applications. Agricultural Journal 1, 478.Google Scholar
Podesta, GP, Messina, C, Grondon, M and Magrin, G (1999) Associations between grain crop yields in central-eastern Argentina and El Niño-Southern Oscillation. Journal of Applied Meteorology 38, 14881498.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raiche, G, Walls, TA, Magis, D, Riopel, M and Blais, JG (2013) Nongraphical solutions for Cattell's scree test. Methodology 9, 2329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team (2022) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Version 4.0.2. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, RC, Dallacort, R, Barbieri, JD, Santi, A and Ramos, HC (2015) Zoning of the annual water balance of sugar cane for the state of Mato Grosso. Biosphere Encyclopedia 11, 113.Google Scholar
Richetti, J, Cima, EG, Johann, JA and Uribe-Opazo, MA (2018) Data mining techniques for rainfall regionalization in Parana state. Acta Iguazu 7, 18.Google Scholar
Rousseeuw, P (1987) Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 20, 5365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, NC, Correia, AB, Behling, SA and Feiden, A (2024) Análise da produção, produtividade e valor das culturas da soja, milho e trigo por mesorregião no Paraná. Revista Desenvolvimento em Questão 60, 120.Google Scholar
Sarle, WS (1983) SAS Technical Report A-108, Cubic Clustering Criterion. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Sathiaraj, D, Huang, X and Chen, J (2018) Predicting climate types for the Continental United States using unsupervised clustering techniques. Environmetrics 25, 112.Google Scholar
Savitzky, A and Golay, MJE (1964) Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Analytical Chemistry 36, 16271639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, W and Roberts, MJ (2009) Non-linear temperatures effect indicate severe damage to US crops un-der climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106, 37.Google Scholar
Scott, AJ and Symons, MJ (1971) Clustering methods based on likelihood ratio criteria. Biometrics 27, 387397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serio, L, Spescha, L and Murphy, GM (2006) Validación de lãs precipitaciones decádicas de la région pampeana na estimadas por el modelo atmosférico del ECMWF. p.45–52. In: 2° International Workshop on Crop Monitoring and Forecasting in South America, 2006. Proceedings… Montevideo: South America Scientific Network on Crop Monitoring and Forecasting.Google Scholar
Sharma, RK, Kumar, S, Vatta, K, Bheemanahalli, R, Dhillon, J and Reddy, KN (2022) Impact of recent climate change on corn, rice, and wheat in southeastern USA. Scientific Reports 12, 16928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirin, AHS and Thomas, R (2016) Regionalization of rainfall in Kerala state. Procedia Technology 24, 1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, CHW, Mercante, E, Johann, JA, Lamparelli, RAC and Uribe-Opazo, MA (2015) Mapping and discrimination of soya bean and corn crops using spectro-temporal profiles of vegetation indices. International Journal of Remote Sensing 36, 18091824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stansel, JW and Fries, RE (1980) Agrometeorological variables in rice physiology relationships Moisture Water is the main determinant of rice cropping and yield. Moisture amounts: In Proceedings of a Symposium on the Agrometeorology of the Rice Crop (p. 201).Google Scholar
Taiz, L and Zeiger, E (2009) Plant physiology, 4th ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, pp. 848.Google Scholar
Thomas, AL (2018) Soy. Types of Plant Growth. Sector Library of the Faculty of Agronomy. Porto Alegre: UFRGS.Google Scholar
Thornthwaite, CW and Mather, JR (1955) The water balance. Centerton: Drexel Institute of Technology. Climatology 8, 1.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture – USDA (2021) Soja. Available at (Accessed Jul 2021).Google Scholar
Verica, WR (2018) Semi-automatic mapping using a spectro-temporal pattern of agricultural areas and permanent targets with EVI/MODIS in Paraná (Masters Dissertation). Paraná: State University of Western Paraná.Google Scholar
Yee-Shan, K, Wan-Kin, AY, Yuk-Lin, Y, Man-Wah, L, Chao-Qing, W, Xueyi, L and Hon-Ming, L (2013) Drought stress and tolerance in soybean. In Board, J (ed.), Comprehensive Survey of International Soybean Research: Genetics, Physiology, Agronomy and Nitrogen Relationships. Louisiana State University, London, UK: IntechOpen Publisher. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/52945Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Gasparin et al. supplementary material

Gasparin et al. supplementary material
Download Gasparin et al. supplementary material(File)
File 3.5 MB