Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:13:41.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acrylic acid and sodium acrylate as additives for silage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. F. Wilson ,
M. K. Woolford ,
J. E. Cook  and
J. M. Wilkinson
R. F. Wilson
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR, Berkshire
M. K. Woolford
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR, Berkshire
J. E. Cook
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR, Berkshire
J. M. Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR, Berkshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Perennial ryegrass, lucerne and maize were ensiled for 100 days in polythene-bag silos without additive or after the addition of aorylic acid at 0·125, 0·25 and 0·50% of fresh crop weight, sodium acrylate at 0·165, 0·33 and 0·66% of fresh crop weight and formic and propionic acid at 0·25% of fresh crop weight.

Both acrylic acid and sodium acrylate were effective in restricting fermentation and protein breakdown in the silo. At 0·25% acrylic acid and the corresponding rate of sodium acrylate (0·33%) they were more effective in restricting fermentation than formic or propionic acids at 0·25%. At all rates of application they were effective in preventing deterioration of maize silage exposed to air for 13 days but not with ryegrass. Lucerne silages made both with and without additives were stable when exposed to air.

It is suggested that because of its non-volatility and non-corrosive properties sodium acrylate has advantages over the additives at present available.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , April 1979 , pp. 409 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, R. L. (1965). Pathways of carbohydrate metabolism in the rumen. In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant (ed. Dougherty, R. W., Allen, R. S., Burroughs, W., Jacobson, N. L. and McGilliard, A. D.), pp. 379–389. Washington: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Beck, T. & Gross, T. (1964). Ursachen der unterschiedlichen Haltbarkeit von Gärfutter. Das Wirtschaftseigene Futter 10, 298–312.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. & Watson, J. N. (1970). Silage and milk production, a comparison between wilted and unwilted grass silages made with and withoug formic acid. Journal of the British Grassland Society 25, 278–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawshaw, R. (1977). An approach to the evaluation of silage additives. Agricultural Development and Advisory Service Quarterly Review 24, 1–15.Google Scholar
Daniel, P., Honig, H., Weise, F. & Zimmer, E. (1970). Wirkung von propionsaure bei der grünfutter silierung. Das Wirtschaftseigene Futter 16, 239–252.Google Scholar
Dewar, W. A. & McDonald, P. (1961). Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 12, 790–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, F. & Beck, T. (1970). Untersuohungen uber die Hemmung von aeroben Abbauprozessen durch propionsaure bei der analagerung von Gärfutter. Das Wirtschaftseigene Futter 16, 1–14.Google Scholar
Honig, H. (1969). Der Einfluss unterschiedlioh anaerober Lagerungs bedingungen auf den Garverlauf. Proceedings of the 23rd General Meeting, European Grassland Federation, Braunschweig, 173–181.Google Scholar
McLeod, D. St L., Wilkins, R. J. & Raymond, W. F. (1970). The voluntary intake by sheep and cattle of silages differing in free-acid content. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldo, D. R. (1977). Potential of chemical preservation and improvement of forages. Journal of Dairy Science 60, 306–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weast, R. C. (Ed.) (1973). Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 49th edn.Ohio: The Chemical Rubber Company.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. F. & Wilkins, R. J. (1972). An evaluation of laboratory ensiling techniques. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 23, 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. F. & Wilkins, R. J. (1973 a). Formic acid as a silage additive for wet crops of cocksfoot and lucerne. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. F. & Wilkins, R. J. (1973 b). Formic acid as a silage additive. I. Effects of formic acid on fermentation in laboratory silos. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. F. & Wilkins, R. J. (1978). Paraformaldehyde as a silage additive. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolford, M. K. (1975). Microbiological screening of the straight chain fatty acids (C1–C12) as potential silage additives. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 26, 219–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolford, M. K. (1978 a). Antimicrobial effects of mineral acids, salts and sterilizing agents in relation to their potential as silage additives. Journal of the British Grassland Society 33, 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolford, M. K. (1978 b). The aerobic deterioration of silage. ARC Research Review 4, 8–12.Google Scholar
Woolford, M. K. & Cook, J. E. (1977). Investigations into the prevention of the aerobic deterioration of maize silage. Proceedings of the 13th International Grassland Congress, Leipzig, Section 9, 232–237.Google Scholar