Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:02:37.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Yield potential in a dwarf spring wheat and response to crop thinning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. A. Fischer
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Londres 40, Mexico 6, D.F.
D. R. Laing
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Londres 40, Mexico 6, D.F.

Summary

Experiments with wheat describing the effects of crop thinning on grain yield and its components are presented. These were carried out over 5 years in northwest Mexico, using a high-yielding dwarf spring-wheat variety (Triticum aestivum cv. ‘Yecora 70’) grown under irrigation and high fertility. It was shown that thinning largely relieved competition for light, thus increasing photosynthate levels in the plants remaining after thinning. The objective was to evaluate this simple technique as a guide to understanding when grain yield and its components were determined and, in particular, the extent to which post-anthesis photosynthate supply limited yield.

There were major responses in grain yield with thinning between about 50 and 100 days after seeding, and in number of spikes and of grains with thinning between 50 and 90 days (50% anthesis was reached at 87 days). Number of spikelets per spike showed small responses to early thinning (before 50 days). Number of grains/spikelet and kernel weight snowed positive responses to thinning between 65 and 90 days, and 90 and 115 days, respectively. These results agreed with adjacent shading and CO2 fertilization studies but, because of certain difficulties in interpretation of responses, pre-anthesis thinning was not considered a very useful technique.

Anthesis thinning was carried out on 21 separate crops: the kernel weight increase relative to the unthinned control ranged from 6 to 41%, averaging 20%. Anthesis thinning led to increases in stem weight during the first half of the grain filling period, followed by increases in grain growth rate in the latter half. The increase in final kernel weight was greater with higher temperature and lower radiation during grain filling; these variables explained 64% of the variation in kernel weight response. It is suggested that the kernel weight response does indicate the degree of photosynthate limitation during grain filling, showing reasonable agreement with adjacent shading and CO2 fertilization studies. It was concluded that anthesis thinning, because of its relative simplicity, is a useful technique. Implications for yield improvement in Yecora of the results provided by this technique are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, L. H. Jr, Desjardins, R. L. & Lemon, E. R. (1974). Line source carbon dioxide release. I. Field experiment. Agronomy Journal 66, 609–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, N. R. & Smith, H. (1966). Applied Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1973). The effect of water stress at various stages of development on yield processes in wheat. In Plant Response to Climatic Factors. Proceedings Uppsala Symposium, 1970, pp. 233–41. UNESCO.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1976). Yield potential in a dwarf spring wheat and the effect of shading. Crop Science 15, 607–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A., Aguilar, M. I., Mattrer, O. R. & Rivas, A. S. (1976). Density and row spacing effects on irrigated short wheats at low latitude. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, R. M., Bremner, P. M. & Jones, D. B. (1973). Assessing photosynthetic limitation to grain yield in a field crop. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 297307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. T., Finkner, V. C. & Duncan, W. G. (1971). Effects of seasonal timing of competition on grain yield components of winter barley. Agronomy Journal 63, 469–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puckridge, D. W. (1968). Competition for light and its effect on leaf and spikelet development of wheat plants. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 191201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiertz, J. H. J. (1974). Grain growth and distribution of dry matter in the wheat plant as influenced by temperature, light energy and oar size. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 22, 207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J. & French, S. A. W. (1961). Competition within a wheat crop. Rothamsted Experiment Station Report for 1960, p. 94.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J., Thorne, G. N. & French, S. A. W. (1962). Competition between rows of wheat. Rothamsted Experiment Station Report for 1961, p. 85.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. & Holliday, R. (1971). Plant population, shading, and thinning studies in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 453–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar