Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:23:53.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation in self-fertility, flowering time and inflorescence production in inbred Lolium perenne L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. N. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Botany, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
Parivash Jenabzadeh
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Botany, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth

Summary

A number of early generation inbred families and lines, as far as the S5, have been produced by self-pollination in Lolium perenne L. variety S. 23. The pedigree structure is given for 13 parent plants used in the breeding programme to show the patterns of segregation for self-fertility genes and to give the ancestry of eleven S5 inbred lines. Data on numbers of seed set, flowering time and inflorescence production reveal a wide range of variation due to both environmental and genetic components.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Asker, S. (1979). Progress in apomixis research. Hereditas 91, 231240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bean, E. W. & Yok-Hwa, C. (1972). An analysis of the growth of inbred progeny of Lolium. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 147153.Google Scholar
Beddows, A. R., Breese, E. L. & Lewis, B. (1962). The genetic assessment of heterozygous breeding material by means of a diallel cross. I. Description of parents, self- and cross-fertility and early seedling vigour. Heredity 17, 501512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breese, E. L., Stephens, D. E. & Thomas, A. C. (1976). Tetraploid hybrid grasses. Allopolyploidy in action. In Ploidy in Fodder Plants. Report of the Eucarpia Fodder Crops Section, 23–25 04, 1975 (ed. Neusch, B.), PP. 4649. Zurich.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. P. (1954). Studies on growth and development in Lolium. IV. Genetic control of heading responses in local populations. Journal of Ecology 42, 521556.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. P. (1959). Selection and population structure in Lolium. I. The initial populations. Heredity 13, 317340.Google Scholar
Corkill, L. (1956). The basis of synthetic strains of cross-pollinated grasses. Proceedings of the 1th International Grassland Congress, pp. 427436.Google Scholar
Cornish, M. A., Hayward, M. D. & Lawrence, M. J. (1979). Self-incompatibility in ryegrass. I. Genetic control in diploid Lolium perenne L. Heredity 43, 95106.Google Scholar
England, F. J. W. (1974). The use of incompatibility for the production of F 1 hybrids in forage grasses. Heredity 32, 183188.Google Scholar
Foster, C. A. & Wright, C. E. (1970). Variation in the expression of self-fertility in Lolium perenne L. Euphytica 19, 6170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, M. D. (1967). The genetic organisation of natural populations of Lolium perenne. II. Inflorescence production. Heredity 22, 105116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkin, T. J. (1931). Self-fertility in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Bulletin of the Welsh Plant Breeding Station Series H 12, 100112.Google Scholar
Myers, W. M. (1942). Analysis of non-heritable variations in seed set under bag among plants of orchard grass. Dactylis glomerata L. Journal of American Society of Agronomy 34, 11141124.Google Scholar
Nettancourt, D. De. (1977). Incompatibility in A ngiosperms. Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics 3. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.Google Scholar
Nitzsche, Von W. (1971). Cytoplasmatische männliche sterilität bei weidelgras (Loliumspp.). Zeitschrifl für Pflanzenzüchtung 65, 206220.Google Scholar
Utz, H. F. & Oettler, G. (1978). Performance of inbred lines and their top crosses in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung 80, 223229.Google Scholar