Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:43:58.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of progesterone and serum gonadotrophin (P.M.S.) in the control of fertility in sheep. I. The hormonal augmentation of fertility in the ewe during the breeding season

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

I. Gordon
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge

Extract

1. Over four breeding seasons (1952–6) field trials, involving a total of 2504 treated and control ewes of nine breeds (Romney, Clun, Suffolk, Cheviot, Lincoln, Welsh Mountain, Ryeland, Southdown and Hampshire) were conducted in an attempt to increase flock fertility by injections of p.m.s. hormone. The hormone employed was in three forms of preparation: purified, freeze-dried and whole serum. Dosage levels from 250 to 1000 i.u. were injected subcutaneously.

2. There is no evidence that the treatment affected the ability of the ewe to conceive.

3. A significant increase in fertility was induced by treatment. The extent of the increase apparently depended on the dosage level and form of p.m.s. employed, and was found to be affected by the normal fertility status of the sheep undergoing treatment. At any given dosage level of p.m.s. the increases induced by treatment were greatest where flock fertility was very low.

4. When used at comparable dosage levels, whole serum tended to be more effective in inducing superfertility than freeze-dried or purified serum. Freezedried serum tended to be more effective than purified serum.

5. 1047 injected sheep that conceived to service at the treatment oestrus produced 1898 lambs (1·81 lambs per ewe); 997 control ewes that conceived at the same time produced 1506 (1·51 lambs per ewe).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, G., McCance, I. & Watson, R. H. (1955). Aust. Vet. J. 31, 85.Google Scholar
Arai, H. (1920). Amer. J. Anat. 28, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asdell, S. A. (1924). Brit. J. Exp. Biol. 1, 473.Google Scholar
Asdell, S. A. (1946). Patterns of Mammalian Reproduction. Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Askew, R. P. (1937 a). J. Minist. Agric. 44, 450.Google Scholar
Askew, R. P. (1937 b). J. Minist. Agric. 44, 562.Google Scholar
Averill, R. L. W. (1955). Studies in Fertility, 7, 139.Google Scholar
Averill, R. L. W. (1956). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Briggs, H. M., Darlow, A. E., Hawkins, L. E., Wilham, O. S. & Hauser, E. R. (1942). Bull. Okla. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 255.Google Scholar
Bywater, T. L. (1945). J. R. Agric. Soc. 106, 166.Google Scholar
Carlyle, W. L. & McConnell, T. F. (1902). Bull. Mis. Agric. Exp. Sta. 95, 1.Google Scholar
Casida, L. E., Meyer, R. K., McShan, W. H. & Wisnioky, W. (1943). Amer. J. Vet. Res. 4, 76.Google Scholar
Chesney, R. W. L. (1943). Vet. Rec. 55, 477.Google Scholar
Clark, R. T. (1934 a). Anat. Rec. 60, 125.Google Scholar
Clark, R. T. (1934 b). Anat. Rec. 60, 135.Google Scholar
Dauzier, L., Thibault, G. & Wintenberger, S. (1953). Ann. d'l' I.N.R.A., p. 189.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P. & Purser, A. F. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. 48, 245.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1936). J. Genet. 33, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutt, R. H. & Casida, L. E. (1948). Endocrinology, 43, 208.Google Scholar
Evans, H. M. & Simpson, M. E. (1940). Endocrinology, 27, 305.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. H. H. (1949). Sheep Husbandry. London: Crosby Lockwood.Google Scholar
Grant, R. (1934). Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 58, 1.Google Scholar
Gurd, M. R. (1955). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. (1952). J. Agric. Sci. 42, 189.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1921). J. Agric. Sci. 11, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. (1925). J. Fmrs' Cl., Lond., Pt. 6.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr., Hammond, J. & Parkes, A. S. (1942). J. Agric. Sci. 32, 308.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr. (1944). J. Agric. Sci., 34, 97.Google Scholar
Heape, W. (1899). J. R. Agric. Soc., Ser. 3, 10, 217.Google Scholar
Henning, W. L. (1939). J. Agric. Res. 58, 565.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. L., Adams, G. E. & Rowson, L. E. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 46, 143.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. & Hansson, A. (1943). Lanibr.Högsk. Ann. 11, 145.Google Scholar
Kammlade, W. G. Jr., Welsh, J. A., Nalbandov, A. V. & Norton, H. W. (1952). J. Anim. Sci. 11, 646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, R. B. (1937). Butt. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. no. 112.Google Scholar
Laplaud, M. & Thibault, C. (1947). C.R. Acad. Agric. Paris, 33, 516.Google Scholar
Malden, W. J. (1915). British Sheep and Shepherding. London: Macdonald and Martin.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. (1903). Trans. Roy. Soc. B, 196, 47.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. (1904). Trans. Highl. Agric. Soc. Scot. 16, 34.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. (1908). Trans. Highl. Agric. Soc. Scot. 20, 159.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. & Potts, C. G. (1924). Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 996.Google Scholar
McKenzie, F. F. & Terrill, C. E. (1937). Res. Bull. Mo Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 264.Google Scholar
Miller, R. F., Hart, G. H. & Cole, H. H. (1942). Bull. Calif. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 672.Google Scholar
Moule, G. R. & Jackson, M. N. S. (1949). Qd Agric. J. 69, 235.Google Scholar
Moule, G. R. (1954). Aust. Vet. J. 30, 153.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. E. (1924). J. Minist. Agric. 31, 835.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. E. (1926 a). J. Agric. Sci. 16, 365.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. E. (1926 b). J. Minist. Agric. 33, 218.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. E. (1928). Z. induht. Abstamm.- u. Vererb-Lehre, 43, 313.Google Scholar
Okulicev, G. (1934). Ovcevodstvo, no. 9, 33 (A.B.A. 2, 329).Google Scholar
O'Mary, C. C., Pope, A. L. & Casida, L. E. (1950). J. Anim. Sci. 9, 400.Google Scholar
Palsson, H. (1956). Proc. III Int. Con. Anim. Eeprod., Sect. 1, p. 112.Google Scholar
Parkes, A. S. (1943). J. Endocrinol. 3, 268.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. W., Fraps, R. M. & Frank, A. H. (1945). Amer. J. Vet. Res. 6, 165.Google Scholar
Pincus, G. (1940). Anat. Rec. 77, 1.Google Scholar
Price, W. T. (1931). Sheep Breeding Trials. Wilts. C.C. Report.Google Scholar
Roberts, E. (1921). J. Agric. Res. 22, 231.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1951 a). Biol. Rev. 26, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1951 b). J. Agric. Sci. 41, 6.Google Scholar
Schinckel, P. G. (1954). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 6, 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slonaker, J. R. (1927). Amer. J. Physiol. 81, 620.Google Scholar
Smith, P. E. & Engle, E. T. (1927). Amer. J. Anat. 40, 159.Google Scholar
Thibault, C. & Laplaud, M. (1947). C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 224, 1786.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. F. H. (1945). Sheep Husbandry. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Underwood, E. J. & Shier, F. L. (1941). J. Dep. Agric. W. Aust. 18, 13.Google Scholar
Underwood, E. J., Shier, F. L. & Davenport, N. (1944). J. Dep. Agric. W. Aust. 21, 135.Google Scholar
Venkatchalan, G., Nelson, R. H., Thorp, F. Jr., & Luecke, R. W. (1949). J. Anim. Sci. 8, 392.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1949 a). Rep. Anim. Res. Dix. N.Z. Dep. Agric.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1949 b). Massey Agric. Coll. Sheep Farming Annual, 2, 5.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1953). N.Z. J. Agric. 87, 529.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1955). Rep. Ruakura Fmrs' Conf. no. 38.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R., Lambourne, L. J. & Sinclair, D. P. (1954). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. Agric. 35, 421.Google Scholar
Warwick, E. J., Murphree, R. H., Casida, L. E. & Meyer, R. K. (1943). Anat. Rec. 87, 279.Google Scholar
Warwick, E. J. & Casida, L. E. (1943). Endocrinology, 33, 169.Google Scholar
White, R. G. (1929). J. Fmrs' Cl. Proc.Google Scholar
Williams, S. N. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 202.Google Scholar
Wood, R. O. (1952). Rep. Nott. Univ. Dep. Agric. Econ. no. 118.Google Scholar
Wylie, J. (1945). Wye Coll. Econ. Rep. no. 33.Google Scholar
Zondek, B. & Ascheim, S. (1927). Arch. Gynaek. 130, 1.Google Scholar