Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:30:54.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of internal markers to estimate herbage digestibility and intake: 1. Potentially indigestible cellulose and acid insoluble ash

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. D. Penning  and
R. H. Johnson
P. D. Penning
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5LR
R. H. Johnson
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5LR
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Concentrations of potentially indigestible cellulose (PIC) and acid insoluble ash (AIA) were determined in samples of feed and faeces in a study to determine their value as internal markers. PIC and AIA were then used to predict the organic-matter digestibilities (OMD) of samples of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and lucerne (Medicago sativa)of known OMD which had been determined using wether sheep. The mean values for OMD (%) measured in vivo were 67·2 and 62·8 for ryegrass and 58·0 and 55·8 for lucerne at intakes of 15 and 25 g D.M./kg live weight, respectively.

The in vitro digestibility technique, using rumen liquor, gave OMD values of 69·5 and 57·4 for ryegrass and lucerne which are in close agreement with the in vivo values at the lower level of intake.

The mean differences between OMD measured in vivo and that estimated using PIC were: -1·1 (± 0·65) and -1·6 (± 0·46) percentage units for ryegrass and lucerne respectively, and using AIA were: -1·4 (± 0·57) and -3·5 (± 1·61).

For the two feeds tested, OMD was predicted more precisely by PIC than by AIA or the in vitro digestibility technique. However, the PIC technique required the use of rumen-fistulated animals and 10 days to digest samples of faeces; this may make the technique impractical if large numbers of determinations of PIC are required.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 100 , Issue 1 , February 1983 , pp. 127 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cipolloni, M. A., Schneider, B. H., Lucas, H. L. & Pavlech, H. M. (1951). Significance of the differences in digestibility of feeds by cattle and sheep. Journal of Animal Science 10, 337–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbett, J. L. (1981). Measurement of the forage intake of grazing animals. In Forage Evaluation Concepts and Techniques (ed. Wheeler, J. L. and Mochrie, R. D.), pp. 287–297. American Forage and Grassland Council and C.S.I.R.O., Australia.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Maynard, L. A. (1938). The relation of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. Journal of Nutrition 15, 383–395.Google Scholar
Enoels, E. A. N., De Waal, H. O., Biel, L. C. & Malan, A. (1981). Practical implications of the effect of drying and treatment on nitrogen content and in vitro digestibility of samples collected by oesophageally fistulated animals. South African Journal of Animal Science 11, 247–254.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. & Rodriguez, J. M. (1971). The measurement of herbage intake in grazing studies. Annual Report 1970 Grassland Research Institute, pp. 132–140.Google Scholar
Kleiber, M. (1961). The Fire of Life. New York and London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Kotb, A. R. & Luckey, T. D. (1972). Markers in nutrition. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 42, 813–845.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P. (1975). Techniques for estimating nutrient intake and its utilization by the grazing ruminant. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 320–332. University of New England, Australia.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D., Campling, R. C. & Holmes, W. (1969). The effect of level of feeding on the digestibility of diets for sheep and cattle. Animal Production 11, 11–18.Google Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z. & Ørskov, E. R. (1977). A study of the artificial fibre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 645–650.Google Scholar
Playne, M. J. (1978). Estimation of the digestibility of low-quality hays by cattle from measurements made with sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 3, 51–55.Google Scholar
Riewe, E. (1981). Use of small animals as role models in forage evaluations. In Forage Evaluation Concepts and Techniques (ed. Wheeler, J. L. and Mochrie, R. D.), pp. 207–214. American Forage and Grassland Council and C.S.I.R.O., Australia.Google Scholar
Terry, R. A., Osbourn, D. F., Cammell, S. B. & Fenlon, J. S. (1973). In vitro digestibility and the estimation of energy in herbage. Växtodling 27, 19–25.Google Scholar
Thonney, M. L. (1981). Acid insoluble ash as a digestion marker. Proceedings Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers, pp. 118–122.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valderbabano, J. (1979). Techniques of measuring intake by grazing sheep. M.Phil, thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Van Hellen, R. W. & Ellis, W. C. (1977). Sample container porosities for rumen in situ studies. Journal of Animal Science 44, 141–151.Google Scholar
Van Keulen, J. & Young, B. A. (1977). Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. Journal of Animal Science 44, 282–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, R. H. (1979). Digestion during pregnancy and lactation in sheep. Annules de Recherches Vitirinaires 10, 442–444.Google Scholar
Weston, R. H. & Margan, D. E. (1979). Herbage digestion in the stomach and intestines of weaner lambs at different stages of their maturity. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 543–549.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J. (1969). The potential digestibility of cellulose in forage and faeces. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 73, 57–64.Google Scholar