Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:56:44.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of electrophoretic techniques to distinguish perennial ryegrass cultivars when sown in mixtures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. J. Kennedy ,
S. J. Gardiner ,
T. J. Gilliland  and
M. S. Camlin
S. J. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Botany, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX
S. J. Gardiner
Affiliation:
Biometrics Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX
T. J. Gilliland
Affiliation:
Agricultural Botany Research Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Plant Testing Station, Crossnacreevy, Belfast, BT6 9SH
M. S. Camlin
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Botany, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In research into competition between individual cultivars of one perennial grass species sown in mixtures, fixed matrix designs have been widely used because of difficulties in identifying the components inanatural sward.Extrapolation of results from such fixed designs to the sward situation is often difficult in any but the short-term context.

This paper describes the principles, requirements and use of an electrophoretic technique together with a mathematical concept which can be used to distinguish certain perennial ryegrass cultivars when sown in mixtures. Such methods have useful implications for the study of sward composition and competitive ability of ryegrass cultivars sown in mixtures. The number of samples required to study selected 2-way cultivar mixtures using this method is indicated.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 104 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almgard, G. & Clapham, D. (1975). Isoenzyme variation distinguishing 1 8 Avena cultivars grownin Sweden. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 61–67.Google Scholar
Brewer, G. J. (1970). An Introduction to Isozyme Techniques. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Camlin, M. S. (1981). Competitive ability of cultivars of ryegrass (Lolium perenne). In Plant Physiology and Herbage Production (ed. Wright, C. E.), pp. 137–142. Occasional Symposium No. 13, British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Darmency, H. & Gasquez, J. (1983). Esterase polymorphism and growth form differentiation in Poa annuaL. New Phytologist 95, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, F. (1968). Competition in mixtures of herbage grasses. Journal of Applied Ecology 5, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, A. (1980). Biochemical Systematics and Evolution. Glasgow: Blackie.Google Scholar
Gardner, A. L. (1960). A technique for investigation of inter-varietal competition in grass species. Proceedings of the 81h International Grassland Congress, pp. 322–324.Google Scholar
Gardner, A. L. & Hunt, I. V. (1963). Inter-varietal competition in perennial ryegrass swards. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliland, T. J. (1983). The use of allozymesof phosphoglucoisomerase for cultivar identification and registration in the genus Lolium. Ph.D. thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Gilliland, T. J., Camlin, M. S. & Wright, C. E. (1982). Evaluation of phosphoglucoisomerase allozyme electrophoresis for the identification and registration of cultivars of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Seed Science and Technology 10, 1–15.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, L. D. & Weeden, N. F. (1981). Correlation between subcellular location and phosphoglucoisomerase variability. Evolution 35 (5), 1019–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamill, D. E. – Brewbaker, J. L. (1969). Isozyme polymorphism in flowering plants. IV. The peroxidase isozymes of maize (Zea mays). Physiologia Plantarum 22, 945–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, W. (1970). Competition effects on yield and plant and tiller density in mixtures of ryegrass cultivars. Proceedings of the New Zealand Ecological Society 17, 10–17.Google Scholar
Hayward, M. D., Gottlieb, L. D. & McAdam, N. J. (1978). Survival of allozyme variants in swarda of Lolium perenneL. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung 81, 228–234.Google Scholar
Hayward, M. D. & McAdam, N. J. (1977). Isozyme polymorphism as a measure of distinctiveness and stability in cultivars of Lolium perenne. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung 79, 59–68.Google Scholar
Heszky, L. & Kota, M. V. (1972). Comparative examination of diploid and tetraploid forms of Lolium species. Növenytermelès 21 (1), 9–16.Google Scholar
Jones, M. J. (1958). Grassland management. Transactions of the Royal Highland Agricultural Society of Scotland 3, 73–86.Google Scholar
Kranski, B. & Bula, R. J. (1970). Identification of diploid and tetraploid Loliumcultivars grown under controlled environmental conditions. Crop Science 10, 426–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krzakowa, M. & Kraupe, A. (1981). Isozyme investigation of natural populations of the cheatgrass (Bromus tectorumL.). Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 102, 393–399.Google Scholar
Lee, J. W. & Ronalds, J. A. (1967). Effect of environment on wheat gliadin. Nature 213, 844–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumaret, R., Roy, J., Heim, G. & Jacquard, P. (1981). Genetic and functional diversity between and within Cocksfoot populations. In Plant Physiology and Herbage Production (ed. Wright, C. E.), pp. 201–203. Occasional Symposium No. 13, British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Marshall, D. R., Broue, P. & Pryor, A. J. (1973). Adaptive significance of alcohol dehydrogenase isozymes in maize. Nature and New Biology 244, 17–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitra, R., Jagannath, D. R. & Bhatla, C. R. (1970). Disc electrophoresis of analogous enzymes in Hordeum. Phytochemistry 9, 1843–1850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pai, C., Endo, T. & Oka, H. I. (1973). Genetic analysis for peroxidase isozymes and their origin specificity in Oryza perennis and Oryza sativa. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 15, 845–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shechter, Y. & Ayala, R. D. (1974). Electrophoretic analysis of variation within populations of cultivated races of sorghum. American Journal of Botany 61, 49–50.Google Scholar
Singh, A. (1958). The reaction of different types of herbage plant to defoliation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Durham.Google Scholar
Spoor, W. (1975). Genetic systems in Poa, Festuca and Lolium in relation to the production of amenity grass varieties. Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. J. (1969). Yields and tiller numbers of four perennial ryegrass varieties grown as monocultures and certain mixtures in microplots. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 73, 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar