Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:44:20.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the preparation and in vitro breakdown of urea-hemicellulose complex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. L. Punj ,
V. K. Kakkar  and
K. S. Saini
M. L. Punj
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India
V. K. Kakkar
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India
K. S. Saini
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Urea is not efficiently utilized by ruminants mainly because of its more rapid (about 4 times) rate of hydrolysis than the corresponding uptake of ammonia by the rumen microbes (Bloomfield, Garner & Muhrer, 1960). A number of attempts have been made to slow down the release of ammonia either through the production of urease immunity (Sidhu, Jones & Tillman, 1968) or by complexing urea with starch (Deyoe et al. 1968) or with molasses (Chopra et al. 1974). The present communication reports the method of preparation and in vitro breakdown of urea-hemicellulose complex.

Type
Short Notes
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 94 , Issue 3 , June 1980 , pp. 727 - 729
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloomfield, R. A., Garner, G. B. & Muhrer, M. E. (1960). Kinetics of urea metabolism in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 19, 1248.Google Scholar
Chopra, A. K., Kakkar, V. K., Gill, R. S. & Kaushal, J. R. (1974). Preparation of uromol – a urea molasses complex and its rate of breakdown in vitro. Indian Journal of Animal Science 44, 970–972.Google Scholar
Conway, E. J. (1957). In Microdiffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error, 4th ed., 31 pp. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Deyoe, C. W., Bartley, E. E., Pfost, H. B., Boren, F. W., Perky, H. B., Anstaett, F. R., Stiles, D., Sung, A. C. & Meyer, R. (1968). An improved urea product for ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 27, 1163.Google Scholar
Kakkar, V. K. & Punj, M. L. (1979). Modified procedure for the preparation of cell-wall polysacoharides from wheat straw. Indian Journal of Dairy Science (in the Press).Google Scholar
Sidhu, K. S., Jones, E. W. & Tillman, A. D. (1968). Effect of urease immunity on growth, digestion and nitrogen metabolism in ruminant animals. Journal of Animal Science 27, 1703–1708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar