Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T01:48:13.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on goat nutrition Part I. Minimum protein requirement of goats for maintenance-endogenous urinary nitrogen and metabolic faecal nitrogen excretion studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. N. Majumdar
B. N. Majumdar
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Division, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. EUN and MFN excretions have been determined in goats on a N-low ration and also on a N-free ration. The values obtained were,

EUN = 0·052 g./kg. live weight and

MFN = 0·41 g./100 g. dry-matter feed intake.

2. The values so determined with the two feeding regimens, for both the EUN and MFN agreed very closely.

3. The minimum protein requirement of goats for maintenance, as calculated from the EUN value, is 0·65 lb./1000 lb. live weight.

4. The formula for calculating the utilizable protein requirement for this species is found to be P = 0·89. W0.734, and is almost identical with the one given by Mitchell.

5. The usefulness of the above formula in predicting the EUN of immature goats is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , June 1960 , pp. 329 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armsby, H. P. (1917). Nutrition of Farm Animals, p. 326. New York.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wood, W. A. (1951). Brit. J. Nutr. 5, 11.Google Scholar
Bricker, M., Mitchell, H. H. & Kinsman, G. M. (1945). J. Nutr. 30, 269.Google Scholar
Du Toit, B. A. & Smuts, D. B. (1941). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 16, 169.Google Scholar
Harris, L. E. & Mitchell, H. H. (1941). J. Nutr. 22, 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, J. C. D. & Morris, S. M. (1936). Biochem. J. 30, 1682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lines, E. W. & Pierce, A. W. (1931). Res. Bull. Common. Aust. Coun. Sci. Indust. no. 55, 33.Google Scholar
Maynard, L. A. (1951). Animal Nutrition. New York.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (1929). Bull. Nat. Res. Coun., Wash., no. 67.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, B. & Kehar, N. D. (1949). Indian J. Vet. Sci. 19, 99, 113.Google Scholar
Ritzman, E. G. & Benedict, F. G. (1930). Bull. Univ. N. Hampshire Exp. Sta. no. 43, 33.Google Scholar
Smuts, D. B. (1935). J. Nutr. 9, 403.Google Scholar
Smuts, D. B. & Marais, J. S. C. (1938). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 11, 131.Google Scholar
Smuts, D. B. & Marais, J. S. C. (1939). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 13, 219.Google Scholar
Terroine, E. F. & SorgMatter, H. (1927). Arch. Int. Physiol. 29, 121.Google Scholar