Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:45:23.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on feed intake and feed utilization by sheep. II. The utilization of feed by ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. Hadjipieris
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent
J. G. W. Jones
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent
R. H. Wimble
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent
W. Holmes
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent

Extract

1. The yield and composition of milk from twenty Border Leicester x Cheviot ewes offered dried grass cubes, dried grass cubes and hay, hay or grazing was determined over a lactation period lasting 10 weeks. Milk yield was estimated by weighing the lambs before and after each suckling on one day each week. Samples of milk for analysis were obtained at fortnightly intervals by hand milking the left side of each udder before the mid-day suckling by the lambs.

2. Ewes receiving dried grass cubes and suckling twins and those receiving dried grass cubes and hay reached mean peak milk yields of 3470 and 2680 g./day, respectively, at 2-3 weeks after parturition, whilst the yields of the remaining ewes declined continuously from the beginning of lactation. The mean milk yield over the lactation of ewes receiving dried grass cubes and suckling twins was 2785 g./day, of those receiving dried grass cubes and suckling singles 1821 g./day, of those receiving dried grass cubes and hay 2119 g./day and of those receiving hay 1177 g./day. The yield of milk energy was highest for all ewes during the first week after parturition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balch, D. A., & Rowland, S. J. (1957). Brit. J. Nutr. 11, 288–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnicoat, C. R., Logan, A. G., & Grant, A. I. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 4455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1962). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N., &Wainman, F. W. (1956). Brit. J. Nutr. 10, 6991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. (1957). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 19, 435–54.Google Scholar
Coop, I. E. (1962). J. Agric. Sci. 58, 179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coop, I. E., & Drew, K. R. (1963). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 23, 5363.Google Scholar
Coop, I. E., Hill, M. K. (1962). J. Agric. Sci. 58, 187–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, J. M., & Loosli, J. K. (1959). J. Dairy Sci. 42, 843–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, W. L. (1928). Bull. III. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 308.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC., & Williams, A. J. (1962). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 13, 894900.Google Scholar
Holmes, W., Jones, J. G. W., Drake-Brockman, R. M. & White, N. (1965). Anim. Prod. 7, 2737.Google Scholar
Kleiber, M. (1961). The Fire of Life. New York and London: John Wiley and Sons. Inc,Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., McDonald, I., & Pullar, J. D. (1963). Anim. Prod. 5, 19.Google Scholar
Mollgaard, H. (1929). Futterungslehre des Milchviehs. Hannover: M. and H. Shaper.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1957). Nat. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.), Nat. Res. Council Publ. no. 504.Google Scholar
Neidig, R. E., & Iddings, E. J. (1919). J. Agric. Res. 17, 1932.Google Scholar
Ricordeau, G., Boccard, R., & Denamur, R. (1960). Ann. Zootechnie, 9, 97119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, J. F. (1961). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 23, 251–8, 303–9.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. M., & Thomson, W. (1949). Brit. J. Nutr. 2, 290305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, E. J., Shier, F. L., & Cariss, H. G. (1943). J. Agric. West Aust. 20, 288–97.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 93153, 243–302, 368–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar