Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:04:41.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies of the effects of soil aggregate size on the emergence and growth of beet (Beta vulgaris L.) II. Leaf development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

John L. Hammerton
John L. Hammerton
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Seedling beet plants grown on a fine soil separate produced more and larger leaves than those grown on coarser separates. This result has been ascribed to the greater quantity of available water, and the better root-soil water contact, in the fine separate compared with the others. Difficulties of root establishment in the coarser separates may retard the start of leaf development relative to that in the fine separates. Soil separates also affected leaf number, in some experiments, through their effect on seedling emergence, in that rapid emergence gave seedlings a slightly longer period for leaf production.

Fodder beet plants (variety Red Otofte) had a greater leaf number per plant at all counts than plants of any of the sugar-beet strains grown. Polyploid sugar-beet seedlings had larger leaves than diploid seedling.

Nitrogen applications to the seed-bed did not stimulate leaf production. In one instance, heavy fertilizerdressingsretardedleafproduction,probably by an osmotic effect.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , June 1961 , pp. 417 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hammerton, J. L. (1961). J. Agric. Sci. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Loumaye, E. (1952). Publ. tech. Inst. belge Amélior. Better. 20, 69.Google Scholar
Morton, A. G. & Watson, D. J. (1948). Ann. Bot., Lond., N.S., 12, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, P. C. (1957). Nature, Lond., 180, 611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, P. C. (1958 a). J. Agric. Sci. 51, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, P. C. (1958 b). New Phytol. 57, 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1958). Rep. Rothamst. Exp. Sta. for 1957, p. 86.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. & Baptiste, E. C. D. (1938). Ann. Bot., Lond., N.S., 2, 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar