Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:58:31.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The storage of artificially dried grass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Norman C. Wright
Norman C. Wright
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Experiments have been carried out to determine the relation between the moisture content of artificially dried grass and the relative humidity of the surrounding atmosphere. This relation is given by a smooth curve. At relative humidities which are typical of outdoor winter conditions in the British Isles (80–90%) the equilibrium moisture content lies between 18 and 30%.

2. The rate of moulding is directly related to the relative humidity and therefore to the moisture content of the dried grass. For reasonably safe storage a relative humidity of 67 % should not be exceeded. This corresponds to a moisture content of roughly 13 %. Even this low value does not confer absolute immunity from mould growth.

3. The importance of extending storage trials over long periods is stressed. In one instance storage for 300 days was required before mould growth occurred. Neglect of this fact may account for the widely held view that a relative humidity of 70–75 % provides safe storage conditions.

4. Attempts to detect mould growth at an early stage by plating methods proved unsuccessful. It is shown that the two earliest and most reliable indications of mould growth are (i) the appearance of visible mycelium when the product is examined under a low-power objective, and (ii) the detection of a musty smell.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 1941 , pp. 194 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 203 note 1 It may be noted that later experiments with a wide variety of feeding stuffs indicates clearly that the relative humidity rather than the moisture content of the material is the primary factor affecting mould growth.

page 207 note 1 This statement does not apply to samples of high moisture content (above 25%), where mould growth is so rapid that consistent observations are impracticable.

page 208 note 1 Recent experiments show, for instance, that the protein contents of the coarse and fine fractions of dried grass meal may vary by as much as 60–100%.