Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:28:23.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sterile boars with ‘knobbed’ spermatozoa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. R. L. Buttle  and
J. L. Hancock
H. R. L. Buttle
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organization, Edinburgh, 9
J. L. Hancock
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organization, Edinburgh, 9
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Investigations have been made of boars yielding spermatozoa with a specific morphological (‘knobbed’) defect of the acrosome.

Counts were made of the number of knobbed spermatozoa in pairs of nigrosin eosin smears made from the semen of normal boars, in the semen of two (‘affected’) full brothers with ejaculates known to contain a high proportion of knobbed spermatozoa, and in mixtures of normal and affected ejaculates. Few or no knobbed spermatozoa were recorded in the semen of normal boars. Virtually all spermatozoa from the affected boars were recorded as knobbed. Counts on mixed samples agreed well with expected values.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , October 1965 , pp. 255 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aamdal, J. (1951). Nord. Vet. Med. 3, 102.Google Scholar
Bane, A. (1961). Proc. IVth Int. Congr. Reprod. The Hague, pt. IV, 810.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. C., Hancock, J. L. & Shaw, I. G. (1960). J. Agric. Sci. 55, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, H. P. & Hancock, J. L. (1953). J. Agric. Sci. 43, 178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, T. D. (1955). Studies on Fertility. 7, 66. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. L. (1953). J. Exp. Biol. 30, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J. L. (1959a). J. Agric. Sci. 53, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J. L. (1959b). Int. J. Fert. 4, 347.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. L. (1959c). Vet. Rec. 71, 527.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. L. (1961). J. Reprod. Fert. 2, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J. L. & Hovell, G. J. R. (1962). J. Reprod. Fert. 4, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henricson, B. & Backstrom, L. (1964). J. Reprod. Fert. 7, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liess, J. & Krause, D. (1958). Dt. Tierärztl. Wschr. 65, 677.Google Scholar
Madden, D. H. L. (1964). Report concerning the hereditary nature of a spermatozoal defect causing diminished fertility of boars. Unpublished report to Pig Industry Development Authority, London.Google Scholar
Melrose, D. R. & O'Hagan, C. (1961). Proc. IVth Int. Congr. Reprod. The Hague, pt. IV, 855.Google Scholar
Slyziuska, H. & Slyzinski, B. M. (1953). J. Agric. Sci. 43, 253.Google Scholar
Swyer, G. I. M. (1947). Biochem. J. 41, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlfarth, E. 1961. Zuchthyg. FortPflStor. Besam. Haustiere. 5, 268.Google Scholar