Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-25T16:05:54.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some indices of the carcass composition of Dorset Horn Top Cross lambs. II. Specific gravity as an index of the fat content of the carcass and of various joints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

V. N. Khandekar ,
W. R. McManus  and
C. L. Goldstone
V. N. Khandekar
Affiliation:
School of Wool Technology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
W. R. McManus
Affiliation:
School of Wool Technology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
C. L. Goldstone
Affiliation:
School of Wool Technology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An experiment was conducted to investigate the relationship between specific gravity and total fat content of the half-carcass. Specific gravity was found to be highly but negatively correlated with the percentage of fat in the half-carcass

(r = −0·9841, P < 0·001).

It was also found that the sample joint is a satisfactory index of fatness of joint as well as that of the half-carcass.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , October 1965 , pp. 155 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton, R. A. & Kirton, A. H. (1956). Nature, Lond., 178, 920.Google Scholar
Behnke, A. R. (1945). Medicine, 24, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C. J., Hiller, J. C. & Whatlby, J. A. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. 10, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dacosta, E. & Clayton, R. (1950). J. Nvtr. 41, 597.Google Scholar
Keys, A. & Brozek, J. (1953). Physiol. Rev. 33, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khandekab, V. N., Golpstone, C. L. & Mcmantjs, W. R. (1965). J. Agric. Sci. 63, 000.Google Scholar
Kirton, A. H. & Babton, R. A. (1958). N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 1, 633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, E. A., Ashton, G. C. & Kastelic, J. (1955). J. Anim. Sci. 14, 1230.Google Scholar
Kohlbausch, W. (1930). Arbeits Physiologie, 2, 23 (cited by Keys & Brozek, 1953).Google Scholar
Kraybiia, H. F., Bitter, H. L. & Hankins, O. G. (1952). J. Appl. Physiol. 3, 575.Google Scholar
Lofgreen, P. & Garrett, N. (1954). J. Anim. Sci. 14, 396.Google Scholar
Morales, H. F., Rathbtjn, E. N., Smith, R. E. & Pace, N.(1945). J. Biol. Chem. 158, 67.Google Scholar
Moulton, C. R. (1920). J. Biol. Chem. 43, 67.Google Scholar
Pace, N. & Rathbun, E. N. (1945). J. Biol. Chem. 158, 685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palsson, H. (1939). J. Agric. Sci. 29, 544.Google Scholar
Pearson, A. M., Bratzler, L. J., Deans, R. J., Price, J. F., Hoefer, J. A., Reinbke, E. P. & Lueoke, R. W.(1956). J. Anim. Sci. 15, 86.Google Scholar
Rathbun, E. N. & Pace, N. (1945). J. Biol. Chem. 158, 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteman, J. V., Whatley, J. A. & Hiller, J. C. (1953). J. Anim. Sci. 12, 859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, E. M., Mccowb, R. A. & Spray, C. M. (1951). Clin. Sci. 10, 113.Google Scholar