Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:11:33.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some effects of bran and cellulose on the water relationships in the digesta and faeces of pigs Part III. The effect of level of water intake and level of cellulose in the ration on the dry-matter content of the faeces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. H. Cooper  and
C. Tyler
P. H. Cooper
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, University of Reading
C. Tyler
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. An experiment has been described in which pigs were fed rations containing four different levels of cellulose, each ration being fed successively at three different levels of water intake. The cellulose levels were superimposed on a highly digestible basal ration.

2. It appears that altering the level of water intake, while keeping the ration constant, has only a very limited effect on the level of faecal dry-matter percentage, and on the pattern of variation therein.

3. Further evidence is cited in support of the theories, advanced in a previous paper, relating to the influence of fibrous cellulose on water relationships in the digesta and faeces.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , June 1959 , pp. 348 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. & Wainman, F. W. (1956). Brit. J. Nutr. 10, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, P. H. & Tyler, C. (1959 a). J. Agric. Sci. 52, 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, P. H. & Tyler, C. (1959 b). J. Agric. Sci. 52, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar