Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:12:12.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some effects of bran and cellulose on the water relationships in the digesta and faeces of pigs Part II. The effects of adding different levels of fibrous cellulose to a highly digestible purified ration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. H. Cooper  and
C. Tyler
P. H. Cooper
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, University of Reading
C. Tyler
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Two experiments have been described in which pigs were fed different levels of fibrous cellulose superimposed on a highly digestible purified basal ration. These experiments involved 24 hr. faecal collections and ultimate slaughter of the animals, together with analysis of faecal material and gut contents.

2. The results of these experiments, together with those from experiments described in the previous paper in this series, have provided the basis for a discussion of the effects of adding bran and cellulose to pig rations, and of the influence of the progress of the residues of feeds through the digestive tract, on the pattern of excretion and the dry matter content of the faeces.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , June 1959 , pp. 340 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. & Wainman, F. W. (1956). Brit. J. Nutr. 10, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, E. J. & Castle, M. E. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. 47, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, P. H. & Tyler, C. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 52, 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowgill, G. R. & Anderson, W. E. (1932). J. Amer. Med. Ass. 98 ii, 1866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falaschini, A. & Carucci, F. (1934). Nuova Vet. XII.Google Scholar
Lenkeit, W. (1931). Arch. Tierernähr. Tierz. 5, 376.Google Scholar
Usuelli, F. (1932–1933). Profillassi, 6, 7.Google Scholar