Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:27:41.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil erosion in north Norfolk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Evans  and
S. Nortcliff
R. Evans
Affiliation:
Soil Survey, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ
S. Nortcliff
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, King's College, University of London, The Strand, LondonWC2R 2LS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Soil erosion in a field in north Norfolk is described. Gullies formed, one up to 2 m deep, 5 m wide and 214 m long, and from this gully about 450 t of soil was eroded. Other gullies and rills deposited about 275 t of soil. In the large (61 ha) field the area subject to erosion was small, about 2·5%. The soil, slope, cultural and rainfall factors which caused erosion are discussed. Erosion in this field is not a rare phenomenon and crop yields will be affected if erosion continues. A solution to the problem is suggested.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 185 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allison, F. E. (1973). Soil Organic Matter and Its Bole in Crop Production. London: Elsevier, 637 pp.Google Scholar
Anon. (1977). ‘Canyon’ in barley field. Eastern Daily Press, 5 03, p. 1.Google Scholar
Catt, J. A., King, D. W. & Weir, A. H. (1975). The soils of Woburn Experimental Farm. I. Great Hill, Road Piece and Butt Close. Bothamsted Experimental Station, Beportfor 1974, part 2, Harpenden, 5–28.Google Scholar
Catt, J. W., Corbett, W. M., Hodge, C. A. H., Madgett, P. A., Tatler, W. & Weir, A. H. (1971). Loess in the soils of North Norfolk. Journal of Soil Science 22, 444–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, W. M. & Tatler, W. (1974). Soils in Norfolk. II. Sheets TG13/14 (Barningham/Sheringham). Soil Survey Record, no 21. Harpenden, 135 pp.Google Scholar
Dzhadan, G. I., Demidenko, M. K. & Chabanov, G. H. (1975). Effect of the degree of erodibility of soils on their agrochemical properties and grain crop yield. Soviet Soil Science 7, 579–82.Google Scholar
Evans, R. (1971). The need for soil conservation. Area 3, 20–3.Google Scholar
Evans, R. & Morgan, R. P. C. (1974). Water erosion of arable land. Area 6, 221–5.Google Scholar
Falayi, O. & Bouma, J. (1975). Relationships between the hydraulic conductance of surface crusts and soil management in a Typic Hapludalf. Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 39, 957–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenland, D. J., Rimmer, D. & Payne, D. (1975). Determination of the structural stability class of English and Welsh soils using a water coherence test. Journal of Soil Science 26, 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. M. & Palmer, R. C. (1971). Soils in Herefordshire, I. Sheet SO 53 (Hereford South). Soil Survey Record, no 2. Harpenden, 81 pp.Google Scholar
Jones, R. J. A. (1975). Soils in Staffordshire, II. Sheet SJ82 (Eccleshall). Soil Survey Record, no 31, Harpenden. 158 pp.Google Scholar
Lamb, J., Carleton, E. A. & Free, G. R. (1950). Effect of past management and erosion of soil on fertilizer efficiency. Soil Science 70, 385–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, D. S. (1958). Permeability measurements of soil crusts formed by raindrop impact. Soil Science 85, 185–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, R. P. C. (1974). Nature provides, man erodes. Geographical Magazine, London 46, 528–35.Google Scholar
Morgan, R. P. C. (1975). Survey of soil erosion: Readers' observations analysed. Geographical Magazine, London 47, 360–3.Google Scholar
Morgan, R. P. C. (1977). Soil erosion in the United Kingdom: Field studies in the Silsoe area, 1973–75. Occasional Paper, No 4, National College of Agricultural Engineering/Cranfield Institute of Technology. 41 pp.Google Scholar
Nortcliff, S. (1974). Aspects of the spatial variability of soils in Norfolk. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
Olson, T. L. & Wischmeier, W. H. (1963). Soil erodibility evaluation for soils on runoff and erosion stations. Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 27, 590–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, S. (1976). Rain falls too late to bulk up most of the potato crop. Farmers' Weekly, 3 09, p. 44.Google Scholar
Peele, T. C., Latham, E. E. & Beale, O. W. (1945). Relation of the physical properties of different soil types to erodibility. South Carolina Agricultural Experimental Station, Bulletin 357, 31 pp.Google Scholar
Skidmore, E. L., Carstenson, W. A. & Banbury, E. E. (1975). Soil changes resulting from cropping. Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 39, 964–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, P. W. (1968). Soil organic matter and nitrogen changes during 24 years of dryland wheat tillage and cropping practice. Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 32, 427–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S.D.A. (1951). Soil Survey Manual. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Handbook, no. 18. 503 pp.Google Scholar
Whitfield, W. A. D. (1971). Soils in Herefordshire. II. SheetSO52 (Ross-on-Wye, West). Soil Survey Record, no 3. Harpenden. 55 pp.Google Scholar