Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:02:50.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The sodium and potassium content of some grass genera, species and varieties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. ap Griffith  and
R. J. K. Walters
G. ap Griffith
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth
R. J. K. Walters
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Data from one field and three glasshouse experiments are presented on the sodium and potassium contents of a number of grasses and on the effect of nitrogen, potassium, and sodium supply on these.

Large and consistent differences in sodium content exist between different genera of grasses. Potassium content may also show such differences.

Environmental factors which affect sodium content are the supply of nitrogen and potassium. Increasing nitrogen in the growth medium raises the sodium content, increasing potassium lowers it.

A grass with a potentially high sodium content will show a wide range in this element depending on the environment. One with a low sodium potential will remain always low, not unaffected by environment but affected within a more restricted range.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , August 1966 , pp. 81 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cooil, B. J.De Le Fuente, R. & De La Nena, R. S. (1965). Pl. Physiol. 40 (4), 625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppenet, M. & Calvez, J. (1962). Anon. Argon. 13, 203.Google Scholar
Drake, M. & Scarseth, G. D. (1939). Soil Sci. Proc. 4, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garaudeaux, J. (1959). Proceedings of the World Congress of Agricultural Research, Rome, pp. 593.Google Scholar
ap Griffith, G., Jones, D. I. H. & Walters, R. J. K. (1965). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 16, 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkens, Ch. H. (1965). Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 13, (1), 21.Google Scholar
van Itallie, Th. B. (1934). Versl. landbouwk. Onderz. 40, 639.Google Scholar
Kerguelen, M. (1960). Annls. Amél. Pl. 10, 177.Google Scholar
Lehr, J. J., (1960). Proc. 8th Int. Grassld Gongr. p. 101.Google Scholar
McLean, E. O. (1956). Soil. Sci. 82, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, D. G., ap Griffith, G. & Walters, R. J. K. (1964). Rep. Welsh Pl. Breed. Stn 1963, p. 110.Google Scholar
Pritchard, G. I., Plgden, W. J. & Folkins, L. P. (1964). Canad. J. Pl. Sci. 44, (4), 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar