Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:52:18.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The significance of grading-up in the Ayrshire cattle population of Great Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. Wiener
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh, 9

Extract

The grading-up system, in the Ayrshire Cattle breed, whereby the descendants of non-pedigree cows enter the registered (Herd Book) population, is studied principally from three aspects: (1) its numerical importance in the population; (2) the breeding structure of herds practising grading-up, and (3) the possible genetic effect of grading-up on milk and fat yield.

Cows at various stages of grading-up are noted in an Appendix to the Herd Book. The numerical importance of the grading-up system has varied with the rate of expansion of the breed as a whole—being greatest during the most rapid expansion—but, at all times, Appendix cows have had more registered female offspring than have pedigree cows. The volume of grading-up was regulated by the number of cows in Appendix B. Some 6% of the pedigree females registered in the last 30 years have Appendix A mothers and a further 5% or so owe their existence to grading-up during the last 30 years.

On average, the proportion of herds registering bulls is not greatly different among the herds which grade-up and those which do not. Similarly, the ratio of males to pedigree females registered was about the same in both types of herd. None-theless, there appears to be considerable selection against Appendix animals in the ancestry of bulls compared with cows, and none of the large bullbreeding studs appear to pursue a grading-up policy. A greater proportion of Ayrshire herds were grading-up in Scotland than in England.

Entry into Appendix B of the Herd Book is confined to cows reaching a qualifying yield. The daughters (A) of these B cows mated to unselected pedigree bulls were found to yield significantly more in their first lactation (36 gal. milk and 14 lb. butterfat) than contemporary pedigree Ayrshire heifers in the same Scottish milk recorded herds in 1955. Part, if not all, of this superiority is thought to be genetic.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Donald, H. P., Deas, D. W. & Wilson, A. L. (1952). Brit. Vet. J. 108, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahadevan, P. (1951). J. Exp. Agric. 19, 291.Google Scholar
Rendel, J. M. & Robertson, A. (1950). J. Genet. 50, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendel, J. M., Robertson, A. & Alim, K. A. (1951). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 19, 295.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. & Asker, A. A. (1951). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 19, 191.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. & McArthur, A. T. G. (1955). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 94.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. (1950). Ph.D. Thesis, Edinburgh University, p. 126.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. (1953). J. Agric. Sci. 43, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, G. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, G. & Yao, T. S. (1952). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 79, 195.Google Scholar