Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T04:31:48.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sheep handling and welfare standards in livestock markets in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

N. G. GREGORY ,
T. BENSON ,
N. SMITH  and
C. W. MASON
N. G. GREGORY*
Affiliation:
BBSRC and Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, UK
T. BENSON
Affiliation:
Humane Slaughter Association, Brewhouse Hill, Wheathampstead, AL4 8AN, UK
N. SMITH
Affiliation:
Humane Slaughter Association, Brewhouse Hill, Wheathampstead, AL4 8AN, UK
C. W. MASON
Affiliation:
Humane Slaughter Association, Brewhouse Hill, Wheathampstead, AL4 8AN, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Some meat retailers have introduced a trade embargo on fat lambs sold through livestock markets on the grounds that welfare standards associated with live auction markets are said to be worse than standards associated with direct sale to abattoirs. The current study examined the handling difficulties and welfare standards at 24 UK livestock markets. Comparisons were made according to class of animal (store, fat, breeding animals, etc.) and throughput of the market: <100 livestock units (LU) per week, 100–300 LU per week and >300 LU per week. Handling problems examined included refusal to move, balking, slips, falls, impacts, isolation leading to apparent distress, confusion while loading onto vehicles and inappropriate handling such as wool pulling. The overall prevalence of each handling problem was low (usually <0·05 of the sheep). The most common difficulties were impacts, slips and falls when grading fat lambs, and confusion or refusal to load onto the vehicles after the sale in ewes. Store lambs were generally easier to handle than fat lambs. They were less prone to refusing to move, balking, impacts, slips and falls. In fat lambs, slips and falls during grading were more common at small markets, while at larger markets there were more impacts, slips and falls during selling. Confusion during loading onto vehicles after the sale was more common in breeding ewes and rams, and at small markets. Projections in the corridors that were considered to be potential bruising or impact points were found in 0·33 of the markets and 0·71 did not have a way of ensuring that legs could not get trapped between gates and gateposts if sheep attempted to jump out of a holding pen. In most other respects the prevalence of problems with the facilities and during handling was low and it was concluded that a trade embargo on selling fat lambs in markets might not be justified.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 147 , Issue 3 , June 2009 , pp. 333 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdelatif, A. M. & Ahmed, M. M. M. (1994). Water restriction, thermoregulation, blood constituents and endocrine responses in Sudanese desert sheep. Journal of Arid Environments 26, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. M., Wainman, F. W. & Armstrong, D. G. (1959). Environmental temperature, energy metabolism and heat regulation in sheep. I. Partition of heat losses in closely clipped sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 52, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, D. M., Goode, J. A., Hall, S. J. G., Lloyd, D. M. & Parrott, R. F. (1996). Hormonal and physiological effects of a 15 hour road journey in sheep: comparison with the responses to loading, handling and penning in the absence of transport. British Veterinary Journal 152, 593–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, G. D. & Lynch, J. J. (1972). Some aspects of the water balance of sheep at pasture when deprived of drinking water. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 669–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockram, M. S. & Lee, R. A. (1991). Some preslaughter factors affecting the occurrence of bruising in sheep. British Veterinary Journal 147, 120–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC) (1986). Report on the welfare of livestock at markets. London, UK: Farm Animal Welfare Council Secretariat.Google Scholar
FAWC (2005). Report on the welfare of farmed animals at gatherings. London, UK: Farm Animal Welfare Council. Available online at http://www.fawc.org.uk/pdf/markets-report0505.pdf (verified 10/12/08).Google Scholar
Gregory, N. G. (2007). Animal Welfare and Meat Production. 2nd Edn. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, N. G., Benson, T. & Mason, C. W. (in press). Cattle handling and welfare standards in livestock markets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jarvis, A. M. & Cockram, M. S. (1995). Handling of sheep at markets and the incidence of bruising. Veterinary Record 136, 582–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, F. B., Jackson, R. E., Gordon, G. D. H. & Cockram, M. S. (1994). Resting behaviour of sheep in a slaughterhouse lairage. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, T. G., Maunder, D. H. L. & Warriss, P. D. (1994 a). Factors affecting the incidence of bruising in lambs arriving at one slaughterhouse. Veterinary Record 134, 44–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knowles, T. G., Maunder, D. H. L., Warriss, P. D. & Jones, T. W. H. (1994 b). Factors affecting the mortality of lambs in transit to or in lairage at a slaughterhouse, and reasons for carcase condemnations. Veterinary Record 135, 109–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, K. C., Davies, D. H., Cullinane, S. L., Eddison, J. C. & Kirk, J. A. (2000). Taking lambs to the slaughter: marketing channels, journey structures and possible consequences for welfare. Animal Welfare 9, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrott, R. F., Hall, S. J. G. & Lloyd, D. M. (1998). Heart rate and stress hormone responses of sheep to road transport following two different loading procedures. Animal Welfare 7, 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompsett, H. E. & Gregory, N. G. (2008). Ease of loading lambs onto vehicles at livestock markets. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 56, 33–39.Google Scholar
Welfare of Animals at Markets Order (1990). The Welfare of Animals at Markets Order 1990. Statutory Instrument 1990 No. 2628, 1–11. Available online at: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1990/Uksi_19902628_en_1.htm (verified 10/12/08).Google Scholar