Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:21:27.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seed disinfection: V. The stripe diseases of barley and oat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. A. R. Dillon Weston
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge
R. Eric Taylor
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge

Extract

In the past twenty years there has been no noticeable decrease in the number of Helminthosporium infected oat and barley seed samples examined at the Official Seed Testing Station, Cambridge, and in the course of advisory practice. No reduction in the intensity of the seedling diseases caused by Helminthosporium has been noted during the first ten years under review. Formalin and copper carbonate were ineffective as seed disinfectants in reducing seedling mortality, and copper sulphate, although partially effective, had serious phytocidal effects and consequently cannot be recommended. Since the advent of the organo-mercury seed disinfectants a steady improvement in the control of these diseases has been noted, and field tests of such dressings have shown them to be eminently satisfactory. Barley straw infected with H. gramineum has been shown to be a source of secondary infection of barley seedlings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brett, C. C., Weston, W. A. R.Dillon & Booer, J. R. (1937). Seed disinfection. III. Experiments on the germination of peas. Seed protection by the use of disinfectant dusts containing mercury. J. Agric. Sci. 27, 5366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, C. C. & Weston, W. A. R.Dillon, (1941). Seed disinfection. IV. Loss of vitality during storage of grain treated with organo-mercury seed disinfectants. J. Agric. Sci. 31, 500–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T. (1925). Studies on the pathogenicity and physiology of H. gramineum Rab. Phytopathology, 15, 797804.Google Scholar
Muskett, A. (1937). A study of the epidemiology and control of Helminthosporium disease of oats. Ann. Bot., Land., N.S. 1, 765–84.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. G. & Dennis, R. W. G. (1932). Further experiments on leaf stripe of oats. Scott. J. Agric. 15, 406–10.Google Scholar
Petherbridge, F. R. (1924). The common cause of failure of spring oats—frit fly. J. Minist. Agric. 30, 925–28.Google Scholar
Smith, N. J. G. (1929). Observations of the Helminthosporium disease of cereals in Britain. I. The behaviour of H. gramineum in a common barley disease. Ann. Appl. Biol. 16, 236–60.Google Scholar
Turner, D. M. & Millard, W. A. (1931). Leaf-spot of oats, Helminthosporium avenae (Bri. & Cav.) Eid. Ann. Appl. Biol. 18,535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, W. A. R.Dillon, & Booer, J. R. (1935). Seed disinfection. I. An outline of an investigation on disinfectant dusts containing mercury. J. Agric. Sci. 25, 628–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, W. A. R.Dillon, Hanley, F. & Booer, J. R. (1937). Seed disinfection. II. Large-scale field trials on the disinfection of seed corn with mercury dust disinfectants. J. Agric. Sci. 27, 4352.Google Scholar
Weston, W. A. R.Dillon, (1942). Seed disinfection of barley and oats. J. Minist. Agric. 49.Google Scholar