Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:38:56.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seasonal production of Andropogon gayanus. I. Seasonal changes in yield components and chemical composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. J. Haggar
Affiliation:
Shika Agricultural Research Station, P.O. Box 116, Zaria, Nigeria

Summary

Changes in yield and quality of an Andropogon gayanus sward were traced throughout the 1964 wet season and part of the following dry season.

Quality, in terms of crude-protein content, was highest at the beginning of the wet season, but yield increased to a maximum at the beginning of the dry season. Once flowering was completed in October, herbage quality fell to a very low level. It was concluded that the best time to cut for hay was in early October, at which time the crude-protein content showed a small but significant increase. Regrowth measurements taken in mid-November indicated the benefit of taking an early hay cut in July as a means of producing better quality hay at the end of the rains.

During the early vegetative phase of growth leaf production was greater than stem production. Quality was high because the leaves contained a higher content of crudeprotein, calcium, phosphorus and carotene than the stems. During the reproductive stage of growth, comprising stem elongation in September culminating in anthesis in early October, quality was lower due to the high fibre content of the stems. The increase in crude-protein in early October, coincided with the expansion of new leaves on the flowering stems.

It was concluded that throughout most of the latter part of the growing season A. gayanus did not provide adequate supplies of crude-protein, calcium and particularly phosphorus for normal cattle growth, especially after flowering was completed in late October.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirement of Livestock; No. 2. Ruminants. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Bowden, B. N. (1963). Studies on Andropogon gayanus Kunth. I. The use of Andropogon gayanus in agriculture. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 31, 267–73.Google Scholar
Bowden, B. N. (1964). Studies on Andropogon gayanus Kunth. III. An outline of its biology. J. Ecol. 52, 255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, N. & Smith, H. (1967). Applied Regression Analysis. New York: J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Foster, W. H. (1962). Investigations preliminary to the production of cultivars of Andropogon gayanus. Euphytica 11, 4752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, W. H. & Mundy, E. J. (1961). Forage species in Northern Nigeria. Trop. Agric. Trin. 38, 311–18.Google Scholar
Grieve, C. M. & Osbourn, D. F. (1965). The nutritional value of some tropical grasses. J. agric. Sci., Gamb. 65, 411–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggar, R. J. (1966). The production of seed from Andropogon gayanus. Proc. int. Seed Test Ass. 31, 251–59.Google Scholar
Howaed, D. A., Burdin, M. L. & Lampkin, G. H. (1962). Variation in the mineral and crude-protein content of pastures at Muguga in the Kenya highlands. J. agric. Sci., Gamb. 59, 251–6.Google Scholar
Kannegieter, A. (1966). The cultivation of grasses and legumes in the forest zone of Ghana. Ghana J. Sci. 6, 97109.Google Scholar
Miller, T. B. & Rains, A. B. (1963). The nutritive value and agronomic aspects of some fodders in Northern Nigeria. I. Fresh herbage. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18, 158–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, T. B. & Iduma, L. E. (1967). Nutrition of Zebu cattle in Northern Nigeria. II. The importance of carotene supplements. Expl Agric. 3, 287–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, T. B.Rains, A. B. & Thorpe, R. J. (1963). The nutritive value and agronomic aspects of some fodders in Northern Nigeria. II. Silages. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18, 223–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council (1963). Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. Publ. 1137 Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Norman, M. J. T. (1966). Katherine Research Station 1956–64: A Review of Published Work. CSIRO Australia. Division of Land Research. Tech. paper No. 28.Google Scholar
Oyenuga, V. A. (1957). The composition and agricultural value of some grass species in Nigeria. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 25, 237–55.Google Scholar
Oyenuga, V. A. (1959). Effect of stage of growth and frequency of cutting on the yield and composition of some Nigerian fodder grasses. Andropogon tectorum Schum. W. Afr. J. biol. Chem. 3, 4358.Google Scholar
Oyenuga, V. A. (1960). Effect of stage of growth and frequency of cutting on the yield and chemical composition of some Nigerian fodder grasses. Panicum maximum Jacq. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 55, 339–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyenuga, V. A. & Hill, D. H. (1966). Influence of fertilizer applications on the yield, efficiency and ash constituents of meadow hay. Niger, agric. J. 3, 614.Google Scholar
Radford, P. J. (1967). Growth analysis formulae—their use and abuse. Crop Sci. 7, 171–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar