Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:42:05.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The response of swede varieties and their hybrids to soil pH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

O. A. Denton
Affiliation:
Nottingham University School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics.
W. J. Whittington
Affiliation:
Nottingham University School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics.

Summary

Four swede varieties and their six F1 hybrids were grown for 2 years in plots varying in pH from 4·2 to 8·4. Yields were highest at intermediate pH's and the average yield of the hybrids was greater than that of the parents. The plants on the low pH plots (4·2, 4·6, 4·7) were less infected with mildew than those at high pH (6·7, 7·7, 8·4). There was no marked resistance to mildew amongst the varieties. The response by the parents and hybrids was assessed by regression analysis and showed that the variety Reform was most reactive and Harvester most stable. Stability patterns appeared to be inherited. Inheritance patterns for yield and number of leaves were determined. It was concluded that selection for better swedes should be carried out in environments other than those to which the crop is currently restricted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, J. C. (1953). The effect of a dominance of a metabolic system requiring iron or copper on the development of lime-induced chlorosis. Plant Physiology 28, 495502.Google Scholar
Brown, J. C. & Hendricks, S. B. (1952). Enzyme activities as indicators of copper and iron deficiencies in plants. Plant Physiology 27, 651–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibb, C. & Brown, A. J. (1964). Effects of dates of sowing on two types of kale and one stockfeed sweed at various harvesting dates. Experimental Husbandry 11, 7582.Google Scholar
Evans, T. (1973). New approaches to increasing fodder production. 2. Swedes and turnips in upland situations. Outlook on Agriculture 7, 171–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, K. W. & Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 742–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, P. H. (1929). Soil acidity considered from the point of view of base exchange and hydrogen iron concentration. Journal of the Department of Agriculture Ireland 28, 75106.Google Scholar
Hart, R. (1969). Swede as a break. Agriculture London 76, 309–12.Google Scholar
Hayman, B. I. (1954). The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. Genetics 39, 789809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hewitt, E. J. (1948). The resolution of the factors in soil acidity. III. The relative effects of aluminium and manganese toxicities on farm and market garden crops. Annual Report of Long Ashton Research Station, 5865.Google Scholar
Hewitt, E. J. (1952). A biological approach to the problem of soil acidity. Transactions of the International Soil Science Society 1, 107–18.Google Scholar
Jinks, J. L. (1954). The analyses of continuous variation in a diallel cross of Nicotiana rustica varieties. Genetics 39, 767–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josefsson, A. (1948). Breeding of root crops. In Svalöf 1886–1946 (ed. , Å. Akermann, Tedin, O., Fröier, K. and Whyte, R. O.). Pp. 148–65. Boktryckëri A–B: Carl Bloms.Google Scholar
Löhnis, M. P. (1951). Manganese toxicity in field and market garden crops. Plant and Soil 3, 193222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löhnis, M. P. (1960). Effect of magnesium and calcium supply on the uptake of manganese by various crop plants. Plant and Soil 12, 339–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, I. H. & Munro, I. K. (1972). Heterosis and its possible exploitation in swedes (Brassica napus L. spp. rapifera). Euphytica 21, 518–22.Google Scholar
McNaughton, I. H. & Thow, R. F. (1972). Swedes and turnips. Field Crop Abstracts 25, 112.Google Scholar
Morris, H. D. & Pierre, W. H. (1949). Minimum concentration of manganese necessary for injury to various legumes in culture solution. Agronomy Journal 41, 107–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, D. (1971). The present position of brassica fodder crops in Scotland. In: The future of Brassica Fodder Crops. Occasional Publications of the Rowett Research Institute No. 2, 913.Google Scholar
Neenan, M. (1960). The effects of soil acidity on the growth of cereals with particular reference to the reaction of varieties thereto. Plant and Soil 12, 324–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Andrews, R. P. & Gill, J. C. (1969). Effect of replacing rolled barley with swedes or potatoes on the intake and rumen volatile fatty acid composition of lambs. Animal Production 11, 187–94.Google Scholar
Owen, W. G. (1964). Swedes and sheep. Agriculture London 71, 561–63.Google Scholar
Perkins, J. & Jinks, J. L. (1968). Environment and genotype environmental components of variability. III. Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity 23, 339–56.Google Scholar
Prytherch, E. I. & Toulson, G. A. (1960). Application of herbicides in conjunction with precision drilling in kale, turnips and swedes. Proceedings of the British Weed Control Conference 1, 133–8.Google Scholar
Russell, E. J. (1973). Soil Conditions and Plant Growth. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Vose, P. B. & Jones, D. G. (1963). The interaction of manganese and calcium on nodulation and growth in varieties of Trifolium repens. Plant and Soil 18, 372–85.Google Scholar
Walsh, T. & Neenan, M. (1956). Manganese, Phosphorus and Molybdenum interactions in relation to manganese toxicity. 6th International Congress of Soil Science, Paris 2, 781–5.Google Scholar
Waterson, H. A. (1959). Swede variety trials in the west of Scotland 1955–1957. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 8, 640–50.Google Scholar
Waterson, H. A. (1970). Swede herbicide trials in the west of Scotland 1962–1970. Proceedings of the British Weed Control Conference 10, 147–54.Google Scholar
Willey, L. A. (1971). The present position of Brassica fodder crops in England and Wales. In: The future of Brassica Fodder Crops. Occasional Publication of the Rowett Research Institute. No. 2, pp. 38.Google Scholar