Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:44:08.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The response of sugar beet to potassium and sodium fertilizers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. J. Durrant ,
A. P. Draycott  and
D. A. Boyd
M. J. Durrant
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP28 6NP
A. P. Draycott
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP28 6NP
D. A. Boyd
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The results of 216 field experiments with sugar beet (1957–69), testing K and Na fertilizers, were re-examined. There were only small increases in yield with K or Na on peat or peaty mineral soils but on mineral soils, 100 kg K/ha without Na increased sugar yield by about 0·4 t/ha and 100 kg Na/ha without K increased yield by 0·6 t/ha. Although the average response per kg of nutrient was approximately in inverse proportion to their atomic weights, K and Na were only partially interchangeable; their relative effects differed from field to field and year to year.

K seemed most effective in years with more than 80 mm rainfall in March–April but responses were halved when rainfall was 50 mm or less. Sowing date and the interval between giving fertilizer and sowing also influenced response to K; with late-sown crops, K fertilizer given within two weeks of sowing was usually ineffective. Response to Na differed much less with season so Na was on average more effective than K, especially in dry springs. It seems, therefore, that instances of near-perfect substitution between K and Na fertilizers result from chance combinations of weather and crop husbandry.

Since in some experiments yields from a combined dressing exceeded those from either nutrient alone, and as the weather is largely unpredictable, both K and Na fertilizers should be given on all mineral soils, except those very rich in K, to be certain of avoiding yield loss. Texture and exchangeable soil K and Na also affected both the amount and rate of response, but did not much influence optimal fertilizer dressings and so are not very useful for making differential fertilizer recommendations.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 83 , Issue 3 , December 1974 , pp. 427 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, S. N. (1961a). The effect of time of application of phosphate and potash on sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 56, 127–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, S. N. (1961b). The effect of sodium and potassium on sugar beet on the Lincolnshire Limestone soils. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 56, 283–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, S. N. (1962). The response of sugar beet to fertilizer and the effect of farmyard manure. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 58, 219–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, D. A. (1973). Developments in field experimentation with fertilizers. Phosphorus in Agriculture No. 61, 7–17.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. A., Garner, H. V. & Haines, W. B. (1957). The fertilizer requirements of sugar beec. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 48, 464–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, D. A., Tinker, P. B. H., Draycott, A. P. & Last, P. J. (1970). Nitrogen requirement of sugar beet grown on mineral soils. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, R. T. & Smith, C. W. R. (1965). The residual effects of potassium fertilizers on yield of arable crops. Experimental Husbandry 12, 15–28.Google Scholar
Crowther, E. M. (1947). The use of salt for sugar beet. British Sugar Beet Review 16, 19–22.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P. (1969). The effect of farmyard manure on fertilizer requirement of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 73, 119–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. (1971). Fertilizer requirements of sugar beet on peaty mineral and organic mineral soils. Experimental Husbandry 20, 64–8.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P. (1974). Report of the Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1973, p. 268.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Durrant, M. J. (1969). The effects of magnesium fertilizer on yield and chemical composition of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 319–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Durrant, M. J. (1970). The relationship between exchangeable soil magnesium and response by sugar beet to magnesium sulphate. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 137–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Marsh, J. A. P. & Tinker, P. B. H. (1970). Sodium and potassium relationships in sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 567–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. C., Gill, W. D., Rodger, J. B. A., White, G. R. & Lawley, D. N. (1961). Experiments with salt and potash on sugar beet in South-East Scotland. Experimental Husbandry 6, 1–7.Google Scholar
Tinker, P. B. H. (1965). The effects of nitrogen, potassium and sodium fertilizers on sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 65, 207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinker, P. B. H. (1970). Fertilizer requirement of sugar beet on fen peat soils. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 73–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar