Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T01:55:25.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative developmental response to the length of exposure to long photoperiod in wheat and barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2004

D. J. MIRALLES
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453 (1417) Buenos Aires, Argentina
G. A. SLAFER
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453 (1417) Buenos Aires, Argentina IFEVA, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453 (1417) Buenos Aires, Argentina Current address: Crop Protection and Forestry, University of Lleida, Centre Ud-IRTA, Av. Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain.
R. A. RICHARDS
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry, CSIRO, G.P.O. Box 1600, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia
H. M. RAWSON
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry, CSIRO, G.P.O. Box 1600, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia

Abstract

The present study was designed to analyse the effect of the length of exposure to a long photoperiod imposed c. 3 weeks after sowing in spring wheat (cv. UQ189) and barley (cv. Arapiles) to (i) establish whether the response to the number of cycles of exposure is quantitative or qualitative, (ii) determine the existence of a commitment to particular stages well before the stage has been observable, and (iii) study the interrelationships between the effects on final leaf number and phyllochron when the stimulus is provided several days after seedling emergence. Both wheat and barley seemed to respond quantitatively to the number of long-day cycles they were exposed to. However, wheat showed a requirement of approximately 4 long-day cycles to be able to produce a significant response in time to heading. The barley cultivar used in the study was responsive to the minimum length of exposure. The response to extended photoperiod cycles during the stem elongation phase was due to the ‘memory’ photoperiod effects being related, in the case of wheat, to the fact that the pre-terminal spikelet appearance phase saturated its photoperiod response well before that stage was reached. Therefore, the commitment to the terminal spikelet appearance in wheat may be reached well before this stage could be recognized.

As the response in duration to heading exceeded that of the final leaf number, and the stem elongation phase responded to memory effects of photoperiod, the phyllochron of both cereals was responsive to the treatments accelerating the average phyllochron when exposed to longer periods of long days. The response in average phyllochron was due to a switch from bi-linear to linear models of leaf number v. time when the conditions were increasingly inductive, with the phyllochron of the initial (6–8) leaves being similar for all treatments (within each species), and from then on increased.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)