Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:24:55.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantification of C and N stocks in grassland topsoils in a Dutch region dominated by dairy farming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2010

M. P. W. SONNEVELD  and
J. J. H. VAN DEN AKKER
M. P. W. SONNEVELD*
Affiliation:
Land Dynamics Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
J. J. H. VAN DEN AKKER
Affiliation:
Alterra, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Estimates on soil organic carbon (SOC) and nitrogen (N) stocks in soils cannot be directly calculated from routine soil analyses, since these often lack measurements on soil bulk density (Bd). Hence, flexible pedotransfer functions are required that allow the calculation of SOC stocks from gravimetrically determined SOC contents. The present paper aimed to: (1) quantify SOC and N stocks in grassland topsoils for a Northern Dutch region dominated by dairy farming and (2) analyse the relationships between SOC and bulk density at the field level. As estimates of SOC and N stocks are potentially affected by soil compaction, the combined measurements on soil bulk density and soil organic matter (SOM) were also evaluated with respect to critical limits for soil compaction using soil density (Sd) for sandy soils and packing density (Pd) for clay soils. The SOC and Bd measurements were done in the upper 0·1–0·2 m of grasslands at 18 dairy farms, distributed across sandy, clay and peat soils. Both farm data and grassland management data were collected. Non-linear regressions were used to analyse relationships between Bd and SOM. Significant non-linear relationships were found between gravimetric SOC contents and bulk density for the 0–0·1 m layer (R2=0·80) and the 0·1–0·2 m layer (R2=0·86). None of the fields on sandy soils or clay soils indicated signs for limited rooting in the topsoil although some fields appear to approach the critical limit for compaction for the 0·1–0·2 m layer. Stocks of SOC in the top 0·2 m at farm level were highest in the peat soils (21·7 kg/m2) and lowest in the sandy soils (9·0 kg/m2). Similarly, N stocks were highest for farms on peat soil (1·30 kg/m2) and lowest for farms on sandy soil (0·60 kg/m2). For the sandy soils, the mean SOC stock was significantly higher in fields with shallow groundwater tables.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 149 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 63 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Batjes, N. H. (1996). Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science 47, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vos, B., Van Meirvenne, M., Quataert, E., Deckers, J. & Muys, B. (2005). Predictive quality of pedotransfer functions for estimating bulk density of forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69, 500–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, J. T. & Crawford, C. E. (1998). Soil compaction effects on utilization of nitrogen from livestock slurry applied to grassland. Grass and Forage Science 53, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, J. T., Campbell, D. J. & Crawford, C. E. (1992). Soil and crop responses to conventional, reduced ground pressure and zero traffic systems for grass silage production. Soil and Tillage Research 24, 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freibauer, A., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Smith, P. & Verhagen, J. (2004). Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils of Europe. Geoderma 122, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frogbrook, Z. L., Bell, J., Bradley, R. I., Evans, C., Lark, R. M., Reynolds, B., Smith, P. & Towers, W. (2009). Quantifying terrestrial carbon stocks: examining the spatial variation in two upland areas in the UK and a comparison to mapped estimates of soil carbon. Soil Use and Management 25, 320–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, R. M. & Roderick, M. L. (2003). Soil carbon stocks and bulk density: Spatial or cumulative mass coordinates as a basis of expression? Global Change Biology 9, 1507–1514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamza, M. A. & Anderson, W. K. (2005). Soil compaction in cropping systems: A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions. Soil and Tillage Research 82, 121–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanegraaf, M. C., Hoffland, E., Kuikman, P. J. & Brussaard, L. (2009). Trends in soil organic matter contents in Dutch grasslands and maize fields on sandy soils. European Journal of Soil Science 60, 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, S. (1996). Effects of manure treatment and soil compaction on plant production of a dairy farm system converting to organic farming practice. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 56, 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassink, J. (1994). Effects of soil texture and grassland management on soil organic C and N and rates of C and N mineralization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 26, 1221–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassink, J. & Neeteson, J. J. (1991). Effect of grassland management on the amounts of soil organic N and C. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 39, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoogerkamp, M. (1984). Changes in productivity of grassland with ageing. PhD thesis, Wageningen University.Google Scholar
Jones, R. J. A., Spoor, G. & Thomasson, A. J. (2003). Vulnerability of subsoils in Europe to compaction: a preliminary analysis. Soil and Tillage Research 73, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. J. A., Hiederer, R., Rusco, E. & Montanarella, L. (2005). Estimating organic carbon in the soils of Europe for policy support. European Journal of Soil Science 56, 655–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kätterer, T., Andersson, L., Andren, O. & Persson, J. (2008). Long-term impact of chronosequential land use change on soil carbon stocks on a Swedish farm. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 81, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempen, B., Brus, D. J., Heuvelink, G. B. M. & Stoorvogel, J. J. (2009). Updating the 1:50,000 Dutch soil map using legacy soil data: A multinomial logistic regression approach. Geoderma 151, 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landi, A., Mermut, A. R. & Anderson, D. W. (2004). Carbon distribution in a hummocky landscape from Saskatchewan, Canada. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68, 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEI (2008). Land-en Tuinbouwcijfers 2008. Gravenhage, The Netherlands: LEI.Google Scholar
Lettens, S., Van Orshoven, J., Van Wesemael, B., De Vos, B. & Muys, B. (2005). Stocks and fluxes of soil organic carbon for landscape units in Belgium derived from heterogeneous data sets for 1990 and 2000. Geoderma 127, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mestdagh, I., Lootens, P., Van Cleemput, O. & Carlier, L. (2006). Variation in organic-carbon concentration and bulk density in Flemish grassland soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science-Zeitschrift Fur Pflanzenernahrung Und Bodenkunde 169, 616–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, W. J. (1983). Estimating soil bulk density from particle size analysis and organic matter content. Soil Science 135, 123–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reijneveld, J. A., Van Wensum, J. & Oenema, O. (2009). Soil organic carbon contents of agricultural land in the Netherlands between 1984 and 2004. Geoderma 153, 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulp, C. J. E. & Veldkamp, A. (2008). Long-term landscape-land use interactions as explaining factor for soil organic matter variability in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Geoderma 146, 457–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonneveld, M. P. W. (2008). Soil water repellency in an old and young pasture in relation to N application. Soil Use and Management 24, 310–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonneveld, M. P. W., Bouma, J. & Veldkamp, A. (2002). Refining soil survey information for a Dutch soil series using land use history. Soil Use and Management 18, 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonneveld, M. P. W., De Vos, J. A., De Vries, W., Knotters, M., Kros, J., Roelsma, J., Bleeker, A., Hensen, A. & Frumau, A. (2009). 3MG: Meervoudige Milieumonitoring voor Gebiedssturing. Een Case Study voor de Noordelijke Friese Wouden. Working Paper 9. Zoetermeer: TransForum Agro & Groen.Google Scholar
Soussana, J. F., Loiseau, P., Vuichard, N., Ceschia, E., Balesdent, J., Chevallier, T. & Arrouays, D. (2004). Carbon cycling and sequestration opportunities in temperate grasslands. Soil Use and Management 20, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springob, G., Brinkmann, S., Engel, N., Kirchman, H. & Bottcher, J. (2001). Organic C levels of Ap horizons in North German Pleistocene sands as influenced by climate, texture, and history of land-use. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 164, 681–690.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiboka (1981). Bodemkaart van Nederland 1:50 000: toelichting bij de kaartbladen 6 West Leeuwarden 6 Oost Leeuwarden en het vaste land van de kaartbladen 2 West Schiermonnikoog en 2 Oost Schiermonnikoog. p. 181. Wageningen: Stiboka.Google Scholar
Van Den Akker, J. J. H. (2006). Evaluation of soil physical quality of Dutch subsoils in two databases with some threshold values. In Soil Management for Sustainability (Eds Horn, R., Fleige, H., Peth, S. & Peng, X.), pp. 490–497. Advances in GeoEcology 38. Reiskirchen, Germany: Catena Verlag GMBH.Google Scholar
Wopereis, F. A. (1994). Invloed van Bodemverdichting op de Wortelontwikkeling van Grasland op Zandgrond. Rapport 260. Wageningen, The Netherlands: DLO-Staring Centrum.Google Scholar
Wösten, J. H. M. (1997). Pedotransfer functions to evaluate soil quality. In Soil Quality for Crop Production and Ecosystem Health (Eds Gregorich, E. G. & Carter, M. R.), pp. 221–245. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar