Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:25:45.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Potential role of rhizobacteria isolated from Northwestern China for enhancing wheat and oat yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2007

T. YAO
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Arid Agroecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China Pratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
S. YASMIN
Affiliation:
National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), P.O. Box 577, Jhang Road, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
F. Y. HAFEEZ*
Affiliation:
National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), P.O. Box 577, Jhang Road, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected], [email protected]

Summary

The present investigation was designed to assess the range of growth-promoting activities of various rhizosphere bacteria on wheat and oat growing in Lanzhou, China. Detection of the N-fixing bacteria by the acetylene reduction assay-based most probable number (ARA-based MPN) method indicated the presence of significant numbers of N-fixing rhizobacteria, i.e. 5·8×106 bacteria/g dry weight of root in association with Chinese wheat variety V4. A total of 24 rhizobacteria was isolated from wheat and oat grown in Lanzhou, China. These bacterial isolates were studied for growth characteristics, nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization and indole acetic acid (IAA) production. All the isolates were motile and gram negative. Acetylene reduction activity was detected in all isolates ranging from 124·6 to 651·6 nmol C2H2 reduced/h/vial while almost all isolates produced IAA ranging from 0·2 to 5·1 μg/ml. Only two isolates, ChW1 and ChW6, formed clear zones on Pikovskaia's medium, showing the ability to solubilize phosphates. ChW1 and ChW6 were used to develop fluorescent antibodies to check the cross reactivity of the isolates. Inoculation of these bacterial isolates resulted in higher plant biomass, root area and total N content on Chinese wheat variety Ningchun 2 and Pakistani oat variety Swan under controlled conditions. Among the wheat isolates, ChW5 was the best in promoting wheat growth by increasing its root length, root area, shoot dry weight and total N content. Among oat isolates, ChO3, ChO5 and ChO6 showed significant effects on different growth parameters of their host plants. Using the 15N isotope dilution method, the highest N fixation contribution (0·73 of total plant N) was observed in the wheat plants inoculated with isolate ChW5. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis of seven selected isolates showed that the variation within the isolates from different host crops grown in the same soil was quite large and helpful not only in defining the bacterial strains associated with different host crops but also in defining the distances of isolates from standard strains of rhizobacteria used. In conclusion, the present results indicate that the selected bacterial isolates did promote the growth of wheat and oat in ways that could be harnessed to practical benefit for the farmer and consistent with sustainable agricultural practices in China.

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashraf, M. Y., Khan, A. H. & Azmi, A. R. (1992). Cell membrane stability and its relation with some physiological processes in wheat. Acta Agronomica Hungaricae 41, 183191.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. (1965). Most probable number method for microbial population. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2 (Eds Black, C. A., Evans, D. D., Ensuinger, L. E., White, J. K. & Clark, F. F.), pp. 14671472. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Arnon, D. I. & Hoagland, D. R. (1940). Crop production in artificial culture solution and in soil with special reference to factors influencing yield and absorption of inorganic nutrients. Soil Science 50, 463483.Google Scholar
Biswas, J. C., Ladha, J. K., Dazzo, F. B., Yanni, Y. G. & Rolfe, B. G. (2000). Rhizobial inoculation influences seedling vigor and yield of rice. Agronomy Journal 92, 880886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boddey, R. M., de Oliveira, O. C., Urquiaga, S., Reis, V. M., de Olivares, F. L., Baldani, V. L. D. & Dobereiner, J. (1995). Biological nitrogen fixation associated with sugarcane and rice: contributions and prospects for improvement. Plant and Soil 174, 195209.Google Scholar
Bremner, J. M. (1965). Total nitrogen. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Agronomy 9 (Eds Black, C. A., Evans, D. D., Ensuinger, L. E., White, J. K. & Clark, F. F.), pp. 11491178. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Chen, B. S., Wang, J. G. & Bi, Y. F. (2001). Forage Cultivation, China: Chinese Agriculture. Beijing, China: Chinese Agricultural Press.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. (1950). Estimation of bacterial densities by means of the most probable number. Biometrics 6, 105115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elbeltagy, A., Nishioka, K., Sato, T., Suzuki, H., Ye, B., Hamada, T., Isawa, T., Mitsui, H. & Minamisawa, K. (2001). Endophytic colonization and in planta nitrogen fixation by a Herbaspirillum sp. isolated from wild rice species. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67, 52855293.Google Scholar
Fried, M. & Middelboe, V. (1977). Measurement of amount of nitrogen fixed by a legume crop. Plant and Soil 47, 713715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gull, M., Hafeez, F. Y., Saleem, M. & Malik, K. A. (2004). Phosphorus uptake and growth promotion of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by co-inoculation of mineral phosphate solubilizing bacteria and a mixed rhizobial culture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 623628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafeez, F. Y., Hameed, S., Ahmad, T. & Malik, K. A. (2001). Competition between effective and less effective strains of Brdyrhizobium spp. for nodulation on Vigna radiata. Biology and Fertility of Soils 33, 382386.Google Scholar
Hameed, S., Yasmin, S., Malik, K. A., Zafar, Y. & Hafeez, F. Y. (2004). Rhizobium, Bradyrhizobium and Agrobacterium strains isolated from cultivated legumes. Biology and Fertility of Soils 39, 79185.Google Scholar
Holt, J. G., Kreig, N. R., Sneath, P. H. A., Staley, J. T. & Williams, S. T. (1994). Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. Baltimore, USA: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Malik, K. A., Rasul, G., Hassan, U., Mehnaz, S. & Ashraf, M. (1998). Role of N2-fixing and growth hormone producing bacteria in improving growth of wheat and rice. In Nitrogen Fixation with Non-legumes (Eds Malik, K. A., Mirza, M. S. & Ladha, J. K.), pp. 197205. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Miller, H. J., Henken, G. & van Veen, J. A. (1989). Variation and composition of bacterial populations in the rhizosphere of maize, wheat and grass cultivars. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 35, 656660.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. & Riley, J. P. (1962). A modified single method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27, 3136.Google Scholar
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2006). China Statistical Yearbook 2006. Beijing, China: National Bureau of Statistics of China. Available online at http://www.stats.gov.cn/english (verified 21/6/07).Google Scholar
Nei, M. & Li, W. H. (1979). Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 76, 52695273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okon, Y., Albrecht, S. L. & Burris, R. H. (1977). Methods for growing Spirillum lipoferum and for counting it in pure culture and in association with plants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 33, 8588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pikovskaia, R. I. (1948). Metabolisation of phosphorus in soil in connection with vital activity of some microbial species. Microbiologiya 17, 362370.Google Scholar
Rennie, R. J. (1981). A single medium for the isolation of acetylene-reducing (dinitrogen-fixing) bacteria in soils. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 27, 814.Google Scholar
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. NY, USA: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Singh, S. & Kapoor, K. K. (1999). Inoculation with phosphate solubilizing microorganisms and a vesicular mycorrhizal fungus improves dry matter yield and nutrient uptake by wheat grown in sandy soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 28, 139144.Google Scholar
Suman, A., Shasany, A. K., Singh, M., Shahi, H. N., Gaur, A. & Khanuja, S. P. S. (2001). Molecular assessment of diversity among endophytic diazotrophs isolated from subtropical Indian sugarcane. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 17, 3945.Google Scholar
Thakuria, D., Talukdar, N. C., Goswami, C., Hazarika, S., Boro, R. C. & Khan, M. R. (2004). Characterization and screening of bacteria from rhizosphere of rice grown in acidic soils of Assam. Current Science 86, 978985.Google Scholar
Vincent, J. M. (1970). A Manual for the Practical Study of Root Nodule Bacteria. IBP Handbook 15. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yasmin, S., Baker, M. A. R., Malik, K. A. & Hafeez, F. Y. (2004). Isolation, characterization and beneficial effects of rice associated plant growth promoting bacteria from Zanzibar soils. Journal of Basic Microbiology 44, 241252.Google Scholar
Yang, J. & Ruan, X. H. (2001). Soil circulation of phosphorus and its effects on the soil loss of phosphorus. Soil and Environmental Science 10, 256258.Google Scholar
Yoshida, S., Forno, D. A., Cock, J. H. & Gomex, K. A. (1976). Laboratory Manual of Physiological Studies of Rice. Los Baños, Philippines: IRRI.Google Scholar
Zhao, X. R. & Lin, Q. M. (2001). A review of phosphorus-driving microorganisms. Soils and Fertilizers 40, 711.Google Scholar