Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:53:27.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Persistence of tropical forage grasses in shaded environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. C. Wong
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
W. W. Stur
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia

Summary

The sowing of improved tropical forages in tree plantations can increase animal productivity considerably, but planted grasses often fail to persist under grazing, resulting in unstable pastures. An experiment was conducted in Brisbane, Australia during the summer of 1989/90 to investigate whether the failure of tropical grasses to persist in shade when regularly defoliated is related to their growth habit. Two shade-tolerant grasses of contrasting growth habit (prostrate Paspalum wettsteiniiv. erect Paspalum malacophyllum)were grown in simulated swards at light levels of 100, 50 and 20% of full sunlight and defoliated every 2 or 4 weeks. Shading and frequent cutting reduced total dry matter yield equally in the two grasses. Shading also reduced tiller density. Paspalum wettsteinii persisted poorly under frequent (2-weekly) defoliation in shade. Plant survival rate of this grass was 66% in the 2-weekly defoliation-20% light transmission treatment, compared with 94% in P. malacophyllum. The poor survival of P. wettsteinii was related to its high allocation of total yield to roots, low tiller density and low total nonstructural carbohydrate yield in residual biomass after defoliation. The inability of P. wettsteinii to adjust in shade to frequent defoliation led to a continual decline in photosynthetic area and light interception, resulting in the depletion of energy reserves, increased susceptibility to Rhizoctonia fungal infection and ultimately to death. It was concluded that growth habit per se cannot be used as a simple indicator for selecting tropical grasses for shaded environments. Instead, morphophysiological adaptation to defoliation in shade was critical for plant persistence.

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burton, G. W. & Jackson, J. E. (1962). A method for measuring sod reserves. Agronomy Journal 54, 5355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, M. M., Richards, J. H., Johnson, D. A., Nowak, R. S. & Dzurec, R. S. (1981). Coping with herbivory: photosynthetic capacity and resource allocation in two semi-arid Agropyron bunch-grasses. Oecologia 50, 1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. P. & Bong, J. I. (1983). Performance of tropical forages under the closed canopy of oil palm. 1. Grasses. MARDI Research Bulletin 11, 248263.Google Scholar
Christiansen, S., Ruelke, O. C. & Lynch, R. O. (1981). Regrowth in darkness as influenced by previous cutting treatment of four Limpograss genotypes. Soil and Crop Science of Florida Proceedings 40, 156159.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B., McNaughton, S. J. & Wallace, L. L. (1985). Responses of an African graminoid (Themeda trianda Forsk) to frequent defoliation, nitrogen, and water: a limit of adaptation to herbivory. Oecologia 68, 105110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delting, J. K., Dyer, M. I. & Winn, D. T. (1979). Net photosynthesis, root respiration and regrowth of Bouleloua gracilisfollowing simulated grazing. Oecologia 41, 127134.Google Scholar
Harris, W. (1978). Defoliation as a determinant of the growth, persistence and composition of pasture. In Plant Relations in Pastures (Ed. Wilson, J. R.), pp. 6785. Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, K. C. & Williams, O. B. (1983). Adaptation to grazing in forage plants. In Genetic Resources of Forage Plants (Eds McLvor, J. G. & Bray, R. A.), pp. 85100. Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Humphreys, L. R. (1981). Environmental Adaptations of Tropical Pasture Plants. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, L. R. & Robinson, A. R. (1966). Subtropical grass growth. 1. Relationship between carbohydrate accumulation and leaf area in growth. Queensland Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences 23, 211259.Google Scholar
Noy-Meir, L. (1975). Stability of grazing systems: an application of predator-prey graphs. Journal of Ecology 63, 459481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, S. G. (1981). Grazing trials under coconuts in Western Samoa. Tropical Grasslands 15, 310.Google Scholar
Shelton, H. M. & Stur, W. W. (Eds) (1991). Forages for Plantation Crops: ACIA R Proceedings No. 32. Proceedings of a Workshop, Sanur Beach, Bali, Indonesia, 27–29 June 1990. Canberra: ACIAR.Google Scholar
Sophanodora, P. (1989). Productivity and nitrogen nutrition of some tropical pasture species under low radiation environments. PhD thesis, University of Queenland, Australia.Google Scholar
Stür, W. W. (1991). Screening forage species for shade tolerance — a preliminary report. In Forages for Plantation Crops: ACIAR Proceedings No. 32 (Eds Shelton, H. M. & Stur, W. W.), pp. 5863. Canberra: ACIAR.Google Scholar
Watson, S. E. & Whiteman, P. C. (1981). Animal production from naturalized and sown pastures at three stocking rates under coconuts in the Solomon Islands. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97, 669676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weier, K. L., Wilson, J. R. & White, R. J. (1977). A semiautomated procedure for estimating total non-structural carbohydrates in grasses and comparison with two other procedures. CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, Technical Paper No. 20.Google Scholar
Wong, C. C. & Wilson, J. R. (1980). Effects of shading on growth and nitrogen content of green panic and Siratro in pure and mixed swards defoliated at two frequencies. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 269285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, C. C., Mohd Sharudin, M. A. & Rahim, H. (1985). Shade tolerance potential of some tropical forages for integration with plantations: 1. Grasses. MA RDI Research Bulletin 13, 225247.Google Scholar