Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:03:34.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the grazing behaviour of lactating dairy cattle in a sub-tropical environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. M. Holder
J. M. Holder
Affiliation:
Wollongbar Experiment Farm, Department of Agriculture, New South Wales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Three trials are reported in which the grazing behaviour of separate groups of cows, one receiving supplementary food, either as conserved roughage, concentrate or fodder crop, was observed over 24 hr. periods. A fourth trial, assessing the effect of summer temperatures on unshaded milking cows, is briefly described.

2. In trials 1 and 2 the stall feeding of either conserved roughage or concentrate reduced grazing as compared with unsupplemented cows by approximately 10%.

3. Allowing access to a fresh ‘strip’ of a fodder crop at a set time each day, whilst not altering total grazing time, very markedly altered periodicity of grazing. Cows delayed grazing up to 3 hr. whilst awaiting a fresh ‘strip’.

4. Environmental temperatures up to 87° F. did not alter total grazing time as compared with grazing time when temperature reached a maximum of only 70° F.

5. The value of supplementary feeding of dairy cattle at pasture, at least where the intake of pasture is sufficient for maintenance and a low level of production, appears to be open to question.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , October 1960 , pp. 261 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Castle, M. E., Foot, A. S. & Halley, R. J. (1950). J. Dairy Res. 17, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J. (1950). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 18, 249.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. (1953). Anim. Breed. Abstr. 21, 1.Google Scholar
Hardison, W. A., Fishek, H. L., Graf, J. C. & Thompson, N. R. (1956). J. Dairy Sci. 39, 1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J. (1958). Private communication. Govt. Meteor. Office, N.S.W.Google Scholar
Holder, J. M. & Swain, F. G. (1958). Proc. Aust. Agrostology Conf. Vol. 1, Paper no. 7.Google Scholar
Larkin, R. M. (1954). Qd J. Agric. Sci. 11, 115.Google Scholar
McClymont, G. L. (1956). Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1, 63.Google Scholar
Payne, W. J., Lang, W. I. & Raivoka, E. N. (1951). Nature, Lond., 167, 610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragsdale, A. C., Brody, S., Thompson, H. J. & Worstell, D. M. (1948). Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. p. 425.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, A. C., Thompson, H. J., Worstell, D. M. & Brody, S. (1953). Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. p. 521.Google Scholar
Seath, D. M. & Miller, G. D. (1946). J. Dairy Sci. 29, 199.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. (1953). Brit. J. Anim. Behav. 1, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, R., MacDonald, W. B. & Holmes, W. (1951). J. Agric. Sci. 41, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar